New York Times chases its tail trying to avoid saying that Paris attack will elect Trump

Coach is Right ^ | 11/19/15 | Kevin "Coach" Collins

[Oldpuppymax]

The New York Times predictable position on what the effects of the ISIS attack on Paris are, “We need an experienced politician to lead us now and that “experienced politician” is (guess who?) Hillary Clinton.

To get to this “breathtaking revelation” the Times first carved through the stupidity of Comrade Bernie Sanders saying he “dispensed with the threat of ISIS in two sentences.”

Then, because it believes its own lies about Ben Carson being the, “front runner” in the Republican primary surveys, the writer felt it necessary to knock him off. As if he was the leader of the Republicans’ doomed attempt to upset “history” by stopping Clinton, the Times said, “Ben Carson struggled to answer a simple question on Sunday about how he would form a coalition to fight the militant group.”

The author then dismisses Carson’s “runner up” Marco Rubio with a few words before sneaking over to the actual point of his argument, “.. the attack may prompt some Democrats who have had misgivings about Hillary Rodham Clinton to come to terms with her given the potential for a general election overshadowed by terrorism.” Really? Did this guy read or watch anything about Benghazi?

The author then becomes cautiously optimistic that Republicans will “realize” that these volatile times, call for, “…wise choices in a world where Western capitals can be...

[W.]

Partisan journalism has its own peculiar and distinctive aroma, namely one of gin and sour impending defeat—smells just like Hillary!

[DaveyB]

The Paris attacks will not elect Trump. They do create a problem for former Sec of State Hillary, because the highlight a failed policy and a failed administration. Less Hillary does not mean more Trump, at least before the first vote in the first caucus and primary has been cast. Events do not vote so they do not elect, and Trump is not the only candidate talking national security. The “Paris attacks elected Trump” meme is more showmanship and monopoly of the media spotlight for selling papers and higher ratings. It is an attempt to circumvent the primary process for polls, popularity for governance. This is not Junior High, hopefully the Republican Party will still act like adults and vote for their candidate based on something other than polls and slogans.

[amnestynone]

Not yet! Wait until America is attacked and then it willbe between Trump and Cruz.

[G Larry]

The NYT doesn’t recognize America needs a COMPETENT AMERICAN LEADER, NOT a politician!!

[null and void]

The Times is correct.

The Paris attacks will not elect Trump.

The Disney World attacks will.

[wideawake]

No one in America will remember the Paris attacks by the spring.

It is patently obvious that Americans completely forgot about 9/11 by the 2008 elections, and that was 20 times worse and happened in their own country.

[Teacher317]

SMH... you KNOW that, if Trump is elected, no shortage of idiots will say that Trump was behind the Paris attack.

[GSWarrior]

That’s because Cruz is going to be elected. Cheers!

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

***It is patently obvious that Americans completely forgot about 9/11 by the 2008 elections,***

The DAY AFTER...
Dec 7, 1941, lines were around the corner with men joining up to whip the Japs!

Sept 11, 2001, Some joined, others said...”I would Love to join up right now to fight the moslems! OMG! I am late for my basket weaving class! Gotta go!”