Posted on 06/11/2016 1:43:40 AM PDT by Jacquerie
Not long ago, certainly within the last couple of years, I yielded to the urge to start a squib when the US senate punted another enumerated power to president Obama. It might have been the power of the purse or maybe the treaty power, but in any event, I opened Tacitus’ (55-117AD) Annals, and tapped out a few notes below. Throughout the imperial period, Roman emperors kept up the façade of republicanism. They pretended to consult the senate and be guided by its votes. The senate in turn, pretended it had a will of its own. If men are willing to live a lie, life can be comfortable for those at the top.
Tacitus:
• Tiberius, while securing to himself the substance of imperial power, allowed the senate some shadow of its old constitution, by referring to its investigation certain demands from the provinces.
• So corrupted indeed and debased was that age by sycophancy that not only the foremost citizens who were forced to save their grandeur by servility, but every ex-consul, most of the ex-praetors and a host of inferior senators would rise in eager rivalry to propose shameful and preposterous motions. Tradition says that Tiberius as often as he left the Senate-House used to exclaim in Greek, “How ready these men are to be slaves.” Clearly, even he, with his dislike of public freedom, was disgusted at the abject abasement of his creatures.
• The higher a man’s rank, the more eager his hypocrisy.
• Laws were most numerous when the commonwealth was most corrupt.
• How few were left who had seen the republic!
End.
From an early age, Tacitus built his renown around superb oratorical skills. His political career launched shortly after he married the daughter of Julius Agricola, Governor of Britain. By virtue of his advancement through the offices of quaestor, aedile, and praetor, he was, by AD 93, at the height of his powers. The next logical office was the consulship, which would have put him very close to the Emperor Domitian. From about AD 89 until his death by assassination in AD 96, the tyrant Domitian demanded personal loyalty from senators and all office-holders. The Emperor enforced full attendance in the senate when honorable men were being judicially murdered, so that he could plainly see who did, or did not, condone his actions.
Death was the reward for the merest suspicion of disloyalty. Tacitus kept his mouth shut and did not stand for the consulship. Those left alive after the Domitian terror regarded themselves as survivors who were deeply impacted by the constant fear of being called out by informers. Such was the horror that men could not trust one another to engage in frank discussion of political matters.
Upon the welcomed death of Domitian, Tacitus began writing in earnest, so that Rome should not have “lost memory as well as voice.”
While there is no shortage of writings which compare imperial Rome and an America in decline, I invite the reader to ponder the similar corruption of our ruling and societal institutions. What has happened to the good men and women who stood up to challenge or even question the encroaching despotism? The mechanisms of government, entertainment, and education are in the hands of those who intend further great harm to the remains of our republic. So thorough is their control, and so insatiable is their appetite to create the New Man, they have in recent decades focused on soiling the foundations of civil society itself.
History, both ancient and recent, illustrate the relative ease with which nations slip into tyranny. Perhaps there is no turning back. But, our demise is certain if patriots do nothing beyond their comfortable yet increasingly irrelevant habit of voting every two years. As opposed to Rome during the time of Jesus, we have the peaceful means to stop and reverse our course. Let’s do it.
Article V.
The vote that counts is one that the Constitution cannot arrange for.
It’s one that God has arranged for in our hearts, every one of them. Without getting this one right, the rest won’t matter. If this one is gotten right, everything else will be blessed.
It is the rose bush that bears the roses, not the roses that bear the rose bush.
This is why our education system has been turned away from the classics. With public ignorance as a foundation history can be repeated.
It might be the other way around. We ignore the classics because we think we can reinvent everything, and they seem like old, impossible, superseded dust.
My Dad read the ancient classics. That got me to read some, been hooked since then.
Much later I read something else that has stuck with me. It goes something like this;
“Times and things change but people don’t. “
Read Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, where the descent into tyranny from democracy is discussed.
"If you want new ideas, read old books; if you want old ideas, read new books."
Mr. niteowl77
I believe it is a hallmark of Modernism that we need new things all the time. Anything from the past (a thousand years? Two hundred years? Five years?) can’t possibly be as good as the thing that came out last month.
It is the essence of building on quicksand and refusing to learn from any past successes or failure.
Modernism is ancient, if I may indulge an oxymoron.
I go deeper, to the Bible, but I am not at all surprised to see actual history play out what the Bible says that sinful humanity has gotten itself into.
Too many components have been tampered with. You can’t turn the vehicle around as it speeds toward destruction. Something to do with momentum, I think.
Destroy the vehicle, and then, IF you survive, walk back.
I wonder what historians in the early 22nd century will write of America.
I read this work years ago. the thing I remember most is political infighting and shenanigans have not changed in two thousand years. The ONLY difference is today a disgraced politician goes home to “be with his family” and write a book. Back then he went home and kills himself.
A convention of states is needed to to restrain our politicians - they have shown that they will not restrain themselves, and seem incapable of stopping stopping themselves from totally bankrupting of the country.
All their incentives are structured against the good of the country. They pander to donors who get them re-elected, and make them rich. The donors are paid a thousandfold from the public treasury, and use their influence to have the economy inefficiently rigged in their favor.
They must be restrained. They won’t vote for it themselves.
“It is the essence of building on quicksand”
Amen.
OTOH, today, the left wages “lawfare” that destroys the livelihood of their enemies (Tom Delay, Scooter Libby) while leaving them alive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.