Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where is this race, really? Trump is behind, but not by much. Here's why . . .
Political Ref ^ | 10/18/16

Posted on 10/18/2016 8:19:58 AM PDT by TheRef

Where is this race, really? Trump is behind, but not by much. Here's why . . .

 

Here is the basic formula for proper analysis as I see it. Races where the incumbent has not solidified somewhere close to fifty percent often break late in the challenger's direction. As you can see in the formula, Trump has plenty of sources from which to draw to break through. MSM is trying to tell you that the race isn't close, but it is in the states. They are also telling you that unproven allegations from women are all that matter, but that isn't correct either. Google trends consistently shows Wikileaks, Hillary quid pro quo, Project Veritas, FBI related topics and other negative Clinton stories in the top twenty.

The state polls tell a different story than the national polls. Even if the national polls are accurate, and I am showing a five-point Hillary lead, none other than Nate Silver acknowledges Trump could win fairly easily without winning the national popular vote. Funny how he's dropped that point lately.

Further, Clinton has had every advantage and she is not solidified close to fifty percent in polling. Normally, this represents a tell tale sign of likely defeat, but fivethirtyeight.com explains that away. Their analysis, however, largely applies to early polling, so what about the fifty percent rule now? Perhaps they should revisit that question.

What polls should we pay attention to?

National polls that sharply diverge from bellwether state polls should be ignored. They are not reflecting what is going on where it really matters, the battleground states. The track record of battleground states, furthermore, in reflecting the actual national popular vote is likely a better indicator of where the national popular vote will actually fall. Why does the national media breathlessly report the most extreme national polls which pollsters know are the least accurate? It's hard to blame anything but media bias. Our nation elects presidents through fifty-one state elections and polls of those elections reflect a close race. It's certainly not an eleven or twelve point race.

The state polling tells a story of a fairly close race by historic standards, certainly a race that can go either way considering all of the new information we are likely to see between now and election day, most of which is bad for Hillary Clinton. It seems like the national media knows this and is trying to finish off Donald Trump so nobody bothers to ask if Hillary Clinton should be president. More on those state polls in a moment. First lets take a look at my national popular vote projection. It shows Trump behind by about five points.

Flag of the United States National Polls

Ref's Projection: Clinton +5.1%

Clinton 45.9, Trump 40.8

   

How does my projection stack up when considering state polls? Very well. Even Nate Silver, who does tend to favor Democrats in his analysis, acknowledges that state polls overall seem to suggest a national lead of about seven points. He also acknowledges that yesterday's CNN polls are consistent with a national lead for Hillary of around three or four points. So I think the middle ground of five points looks about right. But of what use is national polling really? The truth, not much.

   

Polling the nation is always less precise than polling a state. Why?

There are 310,000,000 Americans and 51 Electoral Jurisdictions, so there is much greater opportunity for polling errors.

2012 Electoral College Map

   

My projection is designed to limit the impact of outlier polls because of this imprecision. Unfortunately, polls with extreme results often get reported breathlessly by the media despite their detachment from reality, like the two polls to the right, which I have heard about constantly. Boo! Dishonest!

EXTREME RESULTS

Monmouth, 726 Likely Voters, 12-Point Clinton lead

NBC/WSJ, 908 Likely Voters, 11-point lead for Clinton

 

How do we know these national polls are not very useful?

The bellwether state polls have consistently reflected the national popular vote where it counts, in the actual vote. So shouldn't we look to the polls in those states to tell us where the nation is going? Consider Ohio and Florida.  

Flag of Ohio Ohio

Ref's Projection: Clinton +0.9%

Clinton 44.3, Trump 43.4

   

12,000,000 Ohioans, 1 Electoral Jurisdiction

Ohio's population is only 3% that of the nation. It's also has fewer political dynamics to figure out, so it's easier to get an accurate number.

   

Ohio has a long history of reflecting the national popular vote. See chart to the right. Perhaps we should look to the dead heat in Ohio and conclude that that national race is probably close as well.

  Ohio Dem Natl Dem Ohio GOP Natl GOP
2012 50.7 51.0 47.7 47.2
2008 51.5 52.9 46.9 45.7
2004 48.7 48.3 50.8 50.7
2000 46.5 47.4 50.0 47.9
1996 47.4 49.2 41.0 40.7
   
Flag of FloridaFlorida

Ref's Projection: Clinton +3.0%

Clinton 45.9, Trump 42.9

   

20,000,000 Floridian, 1 Electoral Jurisdiction

Florida's population is 6.4% of the nation's population. It has far fewer political dynamics to understand, so it's easier to poll than the nation at large.

   

Florida has a long history of reflecting the national popular vote. See chart to the right. Perhaps we should look to the small lead Clinton has in Florida and understand that this is a close race.

  Florida Dem Natl Dem Florida GOP Natl GOP
2012 50.0 51.0 49.1 47.2
2008 51.0 52.9 48.2 45.7
2004 47.1 48.3 52.1 50.7
2000 48.8 47.4 48.8 47.9
1996 48.0 49.2 42.3 40.7
So what is the latest from the battleground states?
The Ref's projection of the battleground states is +2.6% Clinton. If Trump can move the numbers by 2.6% in the battleground states, the election would be a tossup. As of now, Clinton is in the lead and would likely win if the election were today. But it's not and he has plenty of material with which to break through the liberal media fog in this election. So let's take a closer look at the state polls.
UPI/CVoter: Nearly every battleground state within margin of error

 
REUTERS/IPSOS shows slightly bigger leads for Clinton, but does not reflect a large national lead
 
   
CNN showed us a battleground state race consistent with a 3 or 4 point national lead for Hillary

 

My battleground state breakdown

Trump has a very good chance of winning 265 electoral votes by winning the following states, FL, NC, OH, IA, AZ and NV. His problem comes in that he needs to add one more state from the following list. CO, NH, WI, MI, NM, PA or ME.

MUST WIN STATES: He leads in Iowa and Arizona. He is within a point in Ohio and North Carolina. He trails by three points in Florida and Nevada. These are not bad numbers for Trump considering the disastrous two weeks he has had. He could turn these around with a good debate performance, some media focus on Hillary's problems or both.

HE NEEDS TO WIN ONE OF THESE SEVEN: His chances in Colorado, Wisconsin and Michigan are probably not very good. He can still win either New Hampshire where he trails by 4.5%, and he has shown an ability to make Pennsylvania close, where he trails by 5.8%. New Mexico, if it votes in large numbers for Johnson, could be a Hail Mary pass for Trump. Trump has also made it close in Maine, but he's pretty far behind there now. So there's a very good chance it could all come down to New Hampshire where I think his chances are better than most people think. It's a small state where he can equal Hillary's spending. He also plays well there culturally as a northeastern rebel.

Ref's Battleground Index

In the Ref's average of all battlegrounds, Clinton leads by 2.6 points

New Hampshire was added to the index as it has become more competitive.

My Twitter account is just getting started. Follow me here!

 
Florida Clinton 45.9, Trump 42.9  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 400LV Clinton 48.7, Trump 46.3

FL - Clinton +3.0

  Quinnipiac Univ 10/10-10/16 660LV Clinton 48, Trump 44
  Gravis 10/11-10/13 1800RV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  PPP 10/12-10/13 990LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/13 1020LV Clinton 48, Trump 42
  Opinion Savvy 10/10-10/11 533LV Clinton 47, Trump 44
  Marist 10/3-10/5 700LV Clinton 45, Trump 42
  Associated Industries of Fl 10/2-10/5 1000LV Clinton 44, Trump 41
  Emerson 10/2-10/4 600LV Clinton 44, Trump 45
  Univ. of North Florida 9/27-10/4 686LV Clinton 41, Trump 38
  Opinion Savvy 9/28-9/29 619LV Clinton 47, Trump 46
       
  Ohio Clinton 44.3, Trump 43.4  
  Quinnipiac 10/10-10/16 630LV Clinton 45, Trump 45

OH - Clinton +0.9

  CNN/OpRes 10/10-10/15 780LV Clinton 44, Trump 48
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 350LV Clinton 50, Trump 46
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/13 1500LV Clinton 42, Trump 43
  NBC/WSJ/Marist 10/10-10/12 724LV Clinton 41, Trump 42
  CBS/YouGov 10/5-10/7 997LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  TargetSmart 10/3-10/6 812LV Clinton 43, Trump 40
  PPP (Dem) 10/5-10/6 782LV Clinton 44, Trump 43
  Monmouth 10/1-10/4 405LV Clinton 44, Trump 42
       
  North Carolina Clinton 46.2, Trump 44.0  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 350LV Clinton 48.0, Trump 47.7

NC - Clinton +2.2

  CNN/OpRes 10/10-10/15 780LV Clinton 48, Trump 47
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/13 1056LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  NBC/WSJ 10/10-10/12 743LV Clinton 45, Trump 41
  Suffolk 10/10-10/12 500LV Clinton 45, Trump 43
  Emerson 10/10-10/12 600LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  UPI/CVoter 10/2-10/9 514LV Clinton 48, Trump 47
  Qunnipiac Univ 9/27-10/2 507LV Clinton 46, Trump 43
  Bloomberg 9/29-10/2 805LV Clinton 44, Trump 43
       
  Wisconsin Clinton 45.3, Trump 39.8  
  UPI/CVoter 10/2-10/9 360LV Clinton 51.1, Trump 45.5

WI - Clinton +5.5

  Reuters/Ipsos 9/30-10/13 620LV Clinton 42, Trump 37
  Marquette 10/6-10/9 878LV Clinton 44, Trump 37
  CBS/YouGov 10/5-10/7 993LV Clinton 43, Trump 39
  Gravis 10/4 1102RV Clinton 48, Trump 40
  Emerson 9/19-9/20 700LV Clinton 45, Trump 38
  Marquette 9/15-9/18 677LV Clinton 44, Trump 42
       
  Iowa Clinton 42.8, Trump 45.8  
  UPI/CVoter 10/2-10/9 322LV Clinton 49, Trump 47

IA - Trump +3.0

  Reuters/Ipsos 9/23-10/7 382LV Clinton 45, Trump 44
  Des Moines Register 10/3-10/6 642LV Clinton 39, Trump 43
  Quinnipiac 9/13-9/21 612LV Clinton 44, Trump 50
  Monmouth 9/12-9/14 404LV Clinton 37, Trump 45
       
  Nevada Clinton 44.6, Trump 41.6  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 320LV Clinton 48.8, Trump 44.7

NV - Clinton +3.0

  JMC Ent 10/10-10/13 600LV Clinton 43, Trump 41
  Reuters/Ipsos 9/23-10/13 350LV Clinton 41, Trump 39
  Public Opinion Strategies 10/11-10/12 600LV Clinton 45, Trump 39
  PPP 10/10-10/11 990LV Clinton 47, Trump 43
  Emerson 10/2-10/4 700LV Clinton 43, Trump 43
       
  Arizona Clinton 42.4, Trump 44.4  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 360LV Clinton 44, Trump 51

AZ - Trump +2.0

  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/13 880LV Clinton 39, Trump 45
  Data Orbital 10/11-10/12 550LV Clinton 43, Trump 42
  Emerson 10/2-10/4 600LV Clinton 44, Trump 42
  OH Predictive Insights 9/28-9/30 718LV Clinton 42, Trump 42
       
  Colorado Clinton 46.5, Trump 40.5  
  Quinnipiac 10/10-10/16 690LV Clinton 45, Trump 37

CO - Clinton +6.0

  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 340LV Clinton 50, Trump 45
  Reuters/Ipsos 9/23-10/13 560LV Clinton 47, Trump 41
  Gravis 10/12-10/13 1226RV Clinton 44, Trump 39
           
  Pennsylvania Clinton 47.2, Trump 41.4  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 380LV Clinton 50, Trump 46

PA - Clinton +5.8

  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/13 1150LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  Bloomberg 10/7-10/11 806LV Clinton 48, Trump 39
  Susquehanna 10/4-10/9 764LV Clinton 44, Trump 40
  CBS/YouGov 10/5-10/7 997LV Clinton 48, Trump 40
           
  New Hampshire Clinton 45.5, Trump 41.0  
  UPI/CVoter 10/10-10/16 310LV Clinton 50, Trump 46

NH - Clinton +4.5

  Reuters/Ipsos 9/23-10/13 200LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  WBUR 10/10-10/12 500LV Clinton 41, Trump 38
  UMASS 10/7-10/11 520LV Clinton 45, Trump 39

 



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; 2016swingstates; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2016 8:19:58 AM PDT by TheRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Well, that’s a lot to absorb. LOL! Thanks for the update. As we’ve all seen, DJT can hardly draw a room full of supporters any more. Oh, wait....................


2 posted on 10/18/2016 8:22:15 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Posts based on polls are no better than posts based on pure wild-ass guesses.


3 posted on 10/18/2016 8:23:26 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

The idea that there’s that many people supporting Hillary. Scary.


4 posted on 10/18/2016 8:24:14 AM PDT by SkyDancer (Ambtion Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Trump has many millions of secret voters and that’s what the MSM is working on


5 posted on 10/18/2016 8:27:59 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Sean Hannity said during his radio show yesterday that if the election were to be held today that Trump would lose.

This is not to say that Clinton would win. It means that Clinton would steal the presidency with millions of illegal votes.


6 posted on 10/18/2016 8:28:29 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

DAMN THE POLLS - IT WILL BE A TRUMP LANDSLIDE - REASON ? ENTUSIASM ! ITS NOT THERE FOR HILLARY ! BUT FOR TRUMP ! THAT WILL PRODUCE A LANDSLIDE! PLUS THE BLACK VOTE IS WAY UP FOR TRUMP COMPARED TO 4 YEARS AGO


7 posted on 10/18/2016 8:29:38 AM PDT by revivaljoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Nice work there on the polling stats.


8 posted on 10/18/2016 8:37:03 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

“hey are also telling you that unproven allegations from women are all that matter, but that isn’t correct either.”

They’re trying to “Herman Cain” him. That has worked in the primaries, but it has never worked in a general election. It didn’t even work against Bill Clinton, and the allegations against him were much more solid and specific.


9 posted on 10/18/2016 8:37:08 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Trump is really at around 65-74% with Hillary under 20%.


10 posted on 10/18/2016 8:38:36 AM PDT by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: revivaljoe

Exactly.

The enthusiasm factor will win this election for Trump. Additionally, the pollsters are basing their results on 2012 turnout for Obama. Not going to happen this election.


11 posted on 10/18/2016 8:39:08 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

If anyone wants a stress reliever over TRUMP watch this! VIDEO
12 posted on 10/18/2016 8:40:22 AM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
At least one recent more optimistic 2016 electoral map resembled
a 2014 midterm map-----the year the Democrats got slaughtered.

Midterm map records Congressional races. 2016 is an electoral readout.

13 posted on 10/18/2016 8:42:03 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

“..not bad numbers for Trump considering the disastrous two weeks he has had. ...”

Should be

“...not bad numbers for Trump considering the two weeks’ smearing by the media he has had. ...”


14 posted on 10/18/2016 8:42:06 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Trump will kill Shitlerey in NY. Game ovah ...


15 posted on 10/18/2016 8:42:15 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (FU Klintoons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Ignore the polls and pray for our country


16 posted on 10/18/2016 8:42:27 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus
HANNITY ......if the election were held today, Trump would lose;
means Clinton steals the presidency with millions of illegal votes........

Obama's handling the voter fraud financing. Read on.

=====================================

BACKSTORY Obama and Congressional Democrats----with a huge assist from then-AG Eric Holder----gave NeighborWorks America (formerly ACORN) and La Raza a huge funding source of tax dollars (to achieve Obama's dream of a permanent Democrat majority?).

The forced banks to pay penalties not to consumers who were harmed.....but to these nefarious organizations.

DOJ went after CitiCorp and ordered them to pay $50 million to La Raza and NeighborWorks America as part of the settlement.

Another clause in the agreement makes it possible for La Raza and NeighborWorks America to rake in even larger amounts of money.

Of the remaining money the banks needed to pay in settlements, the banks were able to contribute additional money to La Raza and NeighborWorks America. For every dollar they contribute, it reduces their debt to the government by 2 dollars. That’s some mighty powerful incentive to give generously.

================================================== House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling have questioned why this money was sent to the ACORN clone and the blood-thirsty LaRaza----rather than to the alleged victims of the bank’s crime. The administration of course declined to answer. “This settlements appear to serve as a vehicle for funding activist groups rather than as a means of securing relief for consumers actually harmed.”

=====================================

So now, with tons of money to fix the presidential election, the largest and most successful voter fraud campaign may alter the course of the elections not to mention the future of the United States.

NO WONDER HILLARY KEEPS SMILING.

==========================================

POINTS TO PONDER ABOUT RAMPANT DEM VOTER FRAUD

<><> Computer voter fraud is a cinch---the DNC can issue a command to a precinct computer to change all Repub votes to Dem.....then erase all the evidence. And remember, Boobabama is giving away the internet to globalists.

<><> MOTOR VOTER FRAUD: In Washington State to get the vote all you need to do is "complete a transaction" at any office...this means taking a number to ask for a brochure qualifies at any DMV office. Take a number, ask for a brochure......et voila.....you get to vote.

<><> Boobamba is importing Democrats by the truckload.....all from the dirt-poor Third world. Not only are they Hillary voters, but they are being placed where their numbers impact the electoral college.

<><> The DNC computers already know how many votes have to be manufactured on each block if not at each address. (hat tip wastoute) President Hillary is looming. The GOPe won’t even whimper. No wonder she keeps smiling.

==================================================

Our top priority should be the prevention of massive voter fraud in November. Voter fraud at every level is being launched ---- the smell of Democrat desperation to elect Hillary is everywhere.

17 posted on 10/18/2016 8:49:07 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: revivaljoe

I like your thinking!

The media has been feeding us BS for decades, these “polls” are more of the same.

Unless there is rampant voter fraud like in 2012, this contest is over.


18 posted on 10/18/2016 8:49:59 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

The NBC poll from Oct 16 is the one that concerns me. Huge 29,000 sample with Hillary up 6 points.


19 posted on 10/18/2016 8:51:03 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRef

Why don’t they include the Ohio poll.


20 posted on 10/18/2016 8:52:00 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson