Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ref's Electoral Projection 11/02/16: Trump 279, Clinton 259 (Analyzing 84 polls from last two week)
Political Ref ^ | 11/02/16

Posted on 11/02/2016 11:02:53 AM PDT by TheRef

Ref's Electoral Projection as of 11/2/16 - Analyzing 84 polls in 10 states from the last two weeks

 

I assume Trump will win Maine-2 and all five Nebraska electoral votes

Polls Only - Clinton 293, Trump 245

Sample Bias - Clinton 272, Trump 266

Sample Bias + Shy Trump Voter Bias - Clinton 272, Trump 266

REF'S PROJECTION: Sample Bias + Shy Trump Voter Bias + Late breaking voters (FBI + incumbency rule) - Clinton 259, Trump 279

FBI refers to the reopening of the investigation and the impact of it. Incumbency rule - normally if incumbents are not above 50%, they are in trouble. I am using 47% as a guide. Where she is below that, she is in danger.

*Sample Bias and Shy Trump Voter Bias Explained  

My Twitter account is just getting started. Follow me here!

 
Florida Clinton 44.9, Trump 45.4  
  *Alliance/ESA 10/27-10/31 530LV Clinton 47, Trump 46

Polls Only - Trump +0.5

Sample bias - Trump +1.7

Shy Voter Bias - Trump +2.3

Late breaking - Trump +2.5

  SurveyMonkey 10/24-10/31 2809LV Clinton 46, Trump 45
  Google Consumer Surveys 10/25-10/31 1286LV Clinton 37, Trump 44
  Remington Research 10/30 990LV Clinton 44, Trump 48
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 408LV Clinton 48, Trump 47
  *Emerson College 10/26-10/27 500LV Clinton 46, Trump 45
  *NYT/Sienna College 10/25-10/27 820LV Clinton 42, Trump 46
  *NBC/Marist College 10/25-10/26 780LV Clinton 45, Trump 44
  Gravis 10/25-10/26 1301RV Clinton 48, Trump 47
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/21-10/27 800LV Clinton 49, Trump 45
  *PPP 10/25-10/26 740LV Clinton 48, Trump 44
  Dixie Strategies 10/25-10/26 700LV Clinton 42, Trump 46
  *Bloomberg 10/21-10/24 810LV Clinton 43, Trump 45
  Florida Atlantic Univ 10/21-10/23 500LV Clinton 46, Trump 43
  CBS/YouGov 10/21-10/22 1040LV Clinton 43, Trump 46
       
  Ohio Clinton 44.0, Trump 46.1  
  SurveyMonkey 10/20-10/28 1980LV Clinton 40, Trump 45

Polls Only - Trump +2.1

Sample bias - Trump +2.9

Shy Voter Bias - Trump +3.4

Late breaking - Trump +3.5

  Google Consumer Surveys 10/25-10/31 980LV Clinton 40, Trump 45
  Remington Research 10/30 1187LV Clinton 43, Trump 48
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 340LV Clinton 50, Trump 47
  *Emerson College 10/26-10/27 800LV Clinton 45, Trump 45
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/21-10/27 508LV Clinton 45, Trump 45
  Trafalger Group 10/24-10/26 1150LV Clinton 44, Trump 49
  *Suffolk 10/17-10/19 500LV Clinton 45, Trump 45
       
  North Carolina Clinton 45.5, Trump 44.9  
  WRAL/Survey USA 10/28-10/31 660LV Clinton 44, Trump 51

Polls Only - Clinton +0.6

Sample bias - Trump +0.5

Shy Voter Bias - Trump +1.3

Late breaking - Trump +1.6

 

  *Alliance/ESA 10/27-10/31 530LV Clinton 46, Trump 46
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 1570LV Clinton 47, Trump 44
  Google Consumer Surveys 10/25-10/31 730LV Clinton 34, Trump 41
  Remington Research 10/30 1180LV Clinton 45, Trump 47
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 350LV Clinton 48, Trump 48
  *Emerson College 10/26-10/27 650LV Clinton 48, Trump 45
  *Elon Univ 10/23-10/27 710LV Clinton 42, Trump 41
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/14-10/27 640LV Clinton 48, Trump 44
  *Marist College 10/25-10/26 780LV Clinton 47, Trump 41
  Gravis 10/25-10/26 1270RV Clinton 49, Trump 47
  *Quinnipiac 10/20-10/26 700LV Clinton 47, Trump 43
  *Monmouth 10/20-10/23 400LV Clinton 47, Trump 46
       
  Wisconsin Clinton 47.7, Trump 43.3  
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 1200LV Clinton 44, Trump 42

Polls Only - Clinton +4.4

Sample bias - Clinton +3.5

Shy Voter Bias - Clinton +2.1

Late breaking - Clinton +1.0

  Remington Research 10/30 1170LV Clinton 46, Trump 42
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 370LV Clinton 50,.Trump 46
  *Emerson College 10/27-10/28 400LV Clinton 48, Trump 42
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/14-10/27 520LV Clinton 47, Trump 42
  UPI/CVoter 10/16-10/23 360LV Clinton 51, Trump 46
  *Let America Work 10/18-10/20 600LV Clinton 48, Trump 43
       
  Iowa Clinton 43.0, Trump 44.4  
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 980LV Clinton 40, Trump 45

Polls Only - Trump +1.4

Sample bias - Trump +2.6

Shy Voter bias - Trump +2.9

Late breaking - Trump +3.1

  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 330LV Clinton 48, Trump 48
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/27 360LV Clinton 44, Trump 42
  *Quinnipiac 10/20-10/26 790LV Clinton 44, Trump 44
  *Des Moines Register 10/3-10/6 642LV Clinton 39, Trump 43
       
  Nevada Clinton 44.0, Trump 43.4  
  *Alliance/ESA 10/27-10/31 530LV Clinton 44, Trump 40

Polls Only - Clinton +0.6

Sample bias - Trump +0.5

Shy Voter Bias - Trump +0.9

Late breaking - Trump +1.1

 

  Survey Monkey 10/25-10/31 1010LV Clinton 43, Trump 42
  Remington Research 10/30 790LV Clinton 44, Trump 48
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 310LV Clinton 48, Trump 46
  *Emerson College 10/26-10/27 550LV Clinton 44, Trump 42
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/27 290LV Clinton 40, Trump 40
  Gravis 10/25 880RV Clinton 46, Trump 46
  *Marist 10/20-10/24 710LV Clinton 43, Trump 43
       
  Arizona Clinton 43.6, Trump 45.4  
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 1460LV Clinton 43, Trump 44

Polls Only - Trump +1.3

Adjusted - Trump +2.6

Shy Voter bias - Trump +2.8

Late breaking - Trump +3.3

  *Data Orbital 10/29-10/30 550LV Clinton 41, Trump 45
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 370LV Clinton 43, Trump 51
  *CBS/YouGov 10/26-10/28 990LV Clinton 42, Trump 44
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/14-10/27 550LV Clinton 43, Trump 42
  Saguaro Strategoes 10/22-10/24 2390LV Clinton 48, Trump 46
  *Monmouth 10/21-10/24 400LV Clinton 45, Trump 46
       
  Colorado Clinton 44.0, Trump 41.3  
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 1530LV Clinton 43, Trump 39

Polls Only - Clinton +2.7

Sample bias - Clinton +1.9

Shy Voter bias - Clinton +0.8

Late breaking - Trump +0.5

  Remington Research 10/30/ 950LV Clinton 45, Trump 44
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/14-10/27 440LV Clinton 46, Trump 43
  *CBS/YouGov 10/26-10/28 1000LV Clinton 42, Trump 39
           
  Pennsylvania Clinton 46.0, Trump 42.5  
  *The Franklin and Marshall poll showing an eleven point lead is excluded. It was taken from a voter list, so new voters are not included, has a 5.1 margin of error, and was completed almost entirely before James Comey's announcement on Friday. This is definitely not an eleven point race and this poll only serves to throw off the average.

Polls Only - Clinton +3.5

Sample bias - Clinton +2.3

Shy Voter bias - Clinton +1.3

Late breaking - Clinton +0.2

  *Alliance/ESA 10/27-10/31 530LV Clinton 43, Trump 44
  SurveyMonkey 10/25-10/31 2260LV Clinton 49, Trump 41
  Google Consumer Surveys 10/25-10/31 1030LV Clinton 37, Trump 39
  Remington Research 10/30 1250LV Clinton 45, Trump 43
  Gravis 10/25-10/30 3220RV Clinton 47, Trump 44
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 370LV Clinton 50, Trump 46
  *CBS/YouGov 10/26-10/28 1090LV Clinton 48, Trump 40
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/21-10/27 450.LV Clinton 48, Trump 46
  *Emerson 10/25-10/26 550LV Clinton 48, Trump 43
  *Muhlenberg College 10/20-10/26 420LV Clinton 45, Trump 39
           
  New Hampshire Clinton 45.6, Trump 42.3  
  *Alliance/ESA 10/27-10/31 530LV Clinton 44, Trump 40

Polls Only - Clinton +3.3

Sample bias - Clinton +1.6

Shy Voter bias - Clinton +0.3

Late breaking - Trump +0.4

  *Univ. of New Hampshire 10/26-10/30 620LV Clinton 46, Trump 39
  UPI/CVoter 10/23-10/29 310LV Clinton 50, Trump 47
  Inside Sources 10/26-10/28 410LV Clinton 43, Trump 45
  Reuters/Ipsos 10/7-10/27 160LV Clinton 44, Trump 40
  *Emerson 10/23-10/25 600LV Clinton 46, Trump 43
  *Monmouth 10/22-10/25 400LV Clinton 46, Trump 42


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: electoral; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: justiceseeker93

If any poll using 2012 modeling is showing Trump up 5... add at least 3-5 to it... this election won’t look ANYTHING like 12... folks have been in denial about that from day one.

Absolutely the disenfranchised are filtered out as non likely voters, because generally speaking if you haven’t voted in the last 2 or 3 cycles pollsters assume you won’t vote this time, no matter how much you tell them you intend to.... this is basically the Monster Vote... and if it exists (and I fully believe it does, particularly in the rust belt).. Trump will get far more than any poll is showing.

The only reason all cycle to question Trump doing well in WI, was the GOPe attempt to stop him during the primaries there... I originally had fear they went so far overboard there, that they may have poisoned the electorate there for Trump during the General... that doesn’t appear to be the case, so I have no reason to question Trump being able to win WI.

CT, don’t know enough about the state to comment. I do think Trump has potential to upset in places no one is remotely thinking about... its hard to imagine if Trump does wind up running the table heavy in places like OH, WI, MI, PA and IA that he will not upset and surprise in other places... My gut, anyplace Hillary is polling less than 5 up, Trump is likely to take... anything she’s up 5-10... surprises could happen.. I don’t care what part of the country or what its historic voting patterns are.


41 posted on 11/02/2016 1:58:05 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

4 yes


42 posted on 11/02/2016 2:05:05 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I’d like to see reemergence of federalism. No 270 votes? Fine, send the election to the House of Reps and see if weak-kneed pubbies can find a backbone.

The only conceivable ways that the election can be sent to the House are (1) a 269-269 tie in EVs or (2) McMullin wins Utah and neither Trump nor the Witch quite get to 270.

In either case, the weak-kneed Pubbies would probably prefer Trump, but they might try to extract some concessions out of him in return for their support.

It would be better than a 'Rat win but worse than an outright Trump win in the electoral vote. But it's very unlikely to happen.

43 posted on 11/02/2016 2:13:47 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TheRef; All
RCP this year has been so obnoxious. They include obvious outliers intended to throw off their averages.

RCP is obviously dominated by 'Rats and their "averaging" of biased polling results only enhances the bias in their direction. Polling averages are generally meaningless because they lump together various polls using various methods and biases, and taken at different times. Garbage in, garbage out!

44 posted on 11/02/2016 2:21:05 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
Survey Monkey polls are online polls, but different from the snap polls that Drudge and the MSM use.

Survey Monkey uses website consumers who are searching for online coupons. As a condition of receiving the coupon, they are asked to take a marketing survey. At the conclusion of that survey they are asked if they wish to take a current events survey for additional discounts. It is this second survey that is used.

The trade-off is that it is still self-selected of people looking for product discounts, but the population is very high (their methodology supposedly handles this).

-PJ

45 posted on 11/02/2016 2:31:25 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

did you send to drudge or anyone who could report on it?


46 posted on 11/02/2016 2:40:26 PM PDT by b4me (Idolatry is rampant in thoughts and actions. Choose whom you will serve....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

Tonight will be interesting for sure.


47 posted on 11/02/2016 4:02:33 PM PDT by TheRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

that was a map mistake. I have MN going blue.


48 posted on 11/02/2016 4:03:27 PM PDT by TheRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Yep, you’re right. I had MN going blue, it was a map mistake. corrected it. Thanks!


49 posted on 11/02/2016 4:04:05 PM PDT by TheRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheRef
This poll stuff drives me crazy.

It is certainly manufactured "news" as it can, at best, represent the current situation.

Clairvoyance as to the future would be great, but who really has that?

50 posted on 11/02/2016 4:07:09 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheRef
This poll stuff drives me crazy.

It is certainly manufactured "news" as it can only, at best, represent the current situation.

Clairvoyance as to the future would be great, but who really has that?

51 posted on 11/02/2016 4:07:51 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheRef
This poll stuff drives me crazy.

It is certainly manufactured "news" as it can only, at best, represent the current situation.

Clairvoyance as to the future would be great, but who really has that?

52 posted on 11/02/2016 4:08:12 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

thanks, I try to keep it realistic. It’s all poll-based, as you can see from the article. I can definitely see a plausible Trump landslide if MI, WI and PA go red, and it could actually happen. I can’t see a Hillary one though.


53 posted on 11/02/2016 4:08:26 PM PDT by TheRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; Impy

trump has no traction in CT
DEM sweep here.


54 posted on 11/02/2016 4:34:03 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (moving out of CT in a few years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Connecticut, I think is in play for Trump. My uncle lives there and the Rat Governor, Mallory, is unpopular, taxes are being raised and companies are fleeing (GE moved their HQ to Boston, Rogers moved their HQ to Arizona). I hope Nutmeggers will vote for Trump and Dan Carter and I’d love to see John Larson (D for dumbass - 1 CD) defeated. (Dad knows the Larsons)


55 posted on 11/02/2016 5:58:47 PM PDT by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Damn, Dem will sweep :-(... My uncle is sick of the idiots in Hartford. Dad said the worst thing voters did was letting Weicker win and not electing Tom Scott for Governor.


56 posted on 11/02/2016 6:06:17 PM PDT by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

1)I hope it’s right

2)Don’t know

3)Sure, WI is not out of play, but it would be extra. Senate race now a tossup there, Johnson closed the gab, Feingold hit with scandal

4)CT is one my 12 safe Shillery states.


57 posted on 11/03/2016 12:25:53 AM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson