BABY KILLER!
BABY KILLER!
BABY KILLER!
BABY KILLER!
BABY KILLER!
...
Works...
He overturned the tables of the Money Changers, yet today's "Christians" somehow don't to seem believe He would overturn the tables of the Baby Killers!
How blind is THAT?
Posted on 02/01/2019 10:36:51 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Abort abortion in order to have it called what it really is: Murder
Shout out to Christians where ever they happen to be: ‘Make 2019 The Year That Civil Society Victoriously Aborts The Word “Abortion”’.
Not such a tall order when it’s backed up with prayer.
Abort abortion in order to have it called what it really is: Murder. Mass Murder on an epic scale in the case of taxpayer-funded Planned Parenthood killing 300,000 unborn American children per year. In the case of Democrat star governors Andrew Cuomo and Ralph Northam, pre-meditated murder.
How much eugenics is in the background. IIRC, that was Hillary’s original reasoning for abortion....rare and compassionate.
Infanticide
Libs will come up with some sort of acronym to replace the word ‘abortion’.
Rush Limbaugh has often said “words mean things.” This is a concept that the left understands very well. After a couple of harsh winters where Americans got tired of shoveling out from under all of the “Global Warming” that was falling, the left dropped that term in favor of “Climate Change.” After years of failing to sell the public on the idea of “Gun Control”, the left has more recently switched to the term “Gun Safety” (same agenda, new name.) We on the right need to do the same. Instead of “Pro Choice” we need to start using the more accurate term :”Anti-Life.” As Rush has said, words mean things.
I just remembered how the lefties would call the military baby killers.....
Yet they support the killing of babies.
Liberals couldn’t believe that people bought into calling Abortion “choice”.
He overturned the tables of the Money Changers, yet today's "Christians" somehow don't to seem believe He would overturn the tables of the Baby Killers!
How blind is THAT?
The legal concept that a human begins to exist at birth is wrong. The law that defines that is wrong. It is contrary to human nature. That law is invalid and not binding.
Last I heard many of the pro-death advocates had given up on the "life begins at birth" argument. They no longer deny they are ending a human life, but that the life they are ending does not have the protections of "personhood". But their "new" argument is just a cop-out. And it does away with the notion of unalienable rights.
P4L
Yes!
We lose vital philosophical territory by accepting the debating terms dictated by the left.
Likewise: Not homosexuality (or gayness!), but homoeroticism. Not gender, but sex.
>>As Rush has said, words mean things.<<
I just posted a rant on another thread supporting a poster’s criticism of the constant reference to “Trump’s Wall”. Of course it’s not his wall, it’s America’s wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.