Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Far-Left WikiPedia Continues to Report ‘Spygate’ Did Not Occur — Pushes #FakeNews, Hides Truth from the Masses and Censors Fact-Based Reporting
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 12/21/2019 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 12/21/2019 9:10:30 AM PST by bitt

The FBI and DOJ and multiple government agencies were out in force in 2015 spying on candidate Trump in attempts to link him up with their fake Russia conspiracy.

General Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell gave us clues in September that Professor Mifsud may have been one of the Deep State’s spies used against the Trump team in late 2015!

In June of 2018 The Gateway Pundit posted an article identifying unredacted words in previously redacted texts between corrupt cops Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, two individuals supposedly having an affair and key players at the top of the FBI involved in spying on candidate and then President Trump.

The discovery came from an individual on Twitter who was then removed from Twitter named Nick Falco who identified a word uncovered in a Senate text that was previously redacted by the corrupt DOJ.

In our post we noted that hidden in the information released by the Senate at that time were unredacted Strzok–Page texts that showed that the FBI initiated actions to insert multiple spies in the Trump campaign in December 2015.

As we reported previously, according to far left LA Times, Comey stated in March of 2017 under oath that the FBI investigation into the Trump – Russia scandal started in July 2016.

We knew then without a doubt that Comey lied about this.

Intelligence expert Tony Shaffer tweeted Falco’s tweet –


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2020election; bloggers; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine; spygate; wikipedia
Far-Left WikiPedia Continues to Report ‘Spygate’ Did Not Occur — Pushes #FakeNews, Hides Truth from the Masses and Censors Fact-Based Reporting
1 posted on 12/21/2019 9:10:30 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bitt

Just like QuidProJoe keeps saying “no one says that” when UKR scandal is brought up to him...

(so many fake news institutions, so little time...)


2 posted on 12/21/2019 9:11:55 AM PST by bitt (A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wikipedia is apparently dying on the vine.

I received a lot of emails from their top liar begging and then basically demanding money.

$crew them, no donations from us.


3 posted on 12/21/2019 9:16:46 AM PST by Grampa Dave (A FRIVOLOUS IMPEACHMENT VOTE is a SERIOUS SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I'm surprised that Satan, er, Soros is allowing them to wither and die. Their propaganda has always served him so well!
4 posted on 12/21/2019 9:20:49 AM PST by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wiki is begging for donations. I would rather send it a stern message.


5 posted on 12/21/2019 9:20:54 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

If you want some info on math/physics/other STEM info, Wiki probably will not lead you wrong.
As for the rest - believe at your peril.


6 posted on 12/21/2019 9:21:02 AM PST by Da Coyote (is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wait! I thought they had controls in place to detect fake news. /s


7 posted on 12/21/2019 9:24:26 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I used them a couple of years ago on non political issues, and donated one year to them.

Sometime this fall, emails were zooming in from them asking for money, pleading for money and lately demanding money. That was when I blocked their emails.

So if they were one of $oreA$$’s charities, he may have cut them off.


8 posted on 12/21/2019 9:26:44 AM PST by Grampa Dave (A FRIVOLOUS IMPEACHMENT VOTE is a SERIOUS SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Every subject on Wikipedia is seen through the prism of leftist connected views or politics. It is almost impossible to predict how this will distort the accuracy of information that you get from there. Even subjects that would seem to have no connection to lefty causes can still be distorted. Something like the history of the country, pollution, or energy is obviously going to be distorted. But even something on earthworms or microprocessors is likely to be distorted in some way. Thinking you are going to get accuracy on anything directly connected to current political battles is laughable.

It is funny that their web site is permanently begging for money when they have an obvious political bias. Let the lefty activists who they love so much pay for it.


9 posted on 12/21/2019 9:39:00 AM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Let the lefty activists who they love so much pay for it.


Activism doesn’t pay well

That is why when companies go out of their way to pease the activist mob, they go broke because those people don’t have money to spend anyways.


10 posted on 12/21/2019 10:15:01 AM PST by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


11 posted on 12/21/2019 10:58:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
If you want some info on math/physics/other STEM info, Wiki probably will not lead you wrong. As for the rest - believe at your peril.

Agreed.

Early in the "resistance" movement I looked up Peter Strzok on Wikipedia. It stated that he was a fine investigator who was unfairly smeared by Fox News and the far right wing. There was no mention of any of his involvement in multiple shady activities. I decided to edit the Wikipedia page to include at least references to what was alleged. When I looked at the page history, I found that the left wing continuously, and almost immediately removes any truth from that page, essentially sanitizing anything that would make the left / elitists / deep state / coup perpetrators (or should that be "perp-a-traitors"?) look bad.

A little more checking and I found that virtually anything on Wikipedia that has any politics involved has been vandalized by the left. At that point I stopped supporting Wikipedia financially and through adding content since they appear to be unwilling or unable to provide any balance in what they present as fact. So stop begging for money, Wikipedia, there's a reason why you've lost a lot of public support.
12 posted on 12/21/2019 11:22:53 AM PST by JayNorth (The Democrats have proven themselves to be pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Wikipedia is apparently dying on the vine.

Good. I’ve made it a point to never click on their site since they disappeared “The People’s Cube”


13 posted on 12/21/2019 11:30:46 AM PST by Flick Lives (MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

There is this which sane people might want to start using

http://www.conservapedia.com

I haven’t been paying attention to see what policies they have to keep the leftards from trying to disrupt/destroy it (free editing would need to be controlled as disrupting such mechanisms is so easy and the Left does NOT like Truth about Everything to actually be heard).


14 posted on 12/21/2019 1:46:55 PM PST by elbook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I donated $5 to them once. Screw them, don’t click on their links in the top 10 search results on any topic, instead scroll down 1/2 a page or so in the search results and find another source.


15 posted on 12/21/2019 1:59:50 PM PST by JacksonCalhoun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Was looking at something on Wikipedia today. They are shamelessly begging for money, above and below the article you are looking at. Thought to myself, if they remove the leftist bias from their political information I might be willing to give them some dough.


16 posted on 12/21/2019 8:52:20 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson