Posted on 10/13/2007 6:14:00 PM PDT by fatima
Anna Nicole Smith, Seeking Justice #4
I think it is because he figured out this judge is not totally convinced. There was something recently that I read that left the thought that this judge wasn’t as willing to push through this will acceptance as HKS would wish. Darn, can’t remember what it was, court papers maybe? Help anyone!
THis might be it: The judge said Virgie would be notified in regard to the will...which means she must have some kind of standing in the judge’s mind.
I love Roger. Sent him an email once or twice in fact. I like his style. He reminds me of the old style reporting.. just give the facts and report the story.
No, it was something more recent Sac. I want to say something more related to a comment the judge made .. then next we know, ol howie is filing his 6% and DL sole heir motions on the same day.
Driving me crazy now. I will look around.
Dirty dealing.
I have no doubt HOward videotaped Anna and her sexual guests. He got paid twice. Once for the privilege and once for a video-tape. Wonder if there is a black market being assembled for those tapes?
Your point is a good one - Anna was probably drugged out of her mind so that he could slip clients in and out of her bed. Would not surprise me at all. Remember Daniel’s claim; *he saw men leaving and giving HOward money* p31 Blonde Ambition.
Can you imagine an ethical, uninvolved attorney trying to probate such an incondite will? Anyone with any sense would ask the judge to throw it out and make a *fair ruling* from the bench.
This could be a pre-cursor to the Marshall estate fight - a precedent. *I am HOward K. Stern, and I can make stuff up when necessary to ensure my own best interests are served* I can kill people too and there’s nothing you can do about it. So there nanaaaaanaaaanenana!
Someone posted a document several posts back of the government going after Ron Rale for an unpaid student loan in 1998 IIRC. I think the loan was later satisfied, but I wonder if HKS might have knowledge if this loan was obtained under false pretenses or something of that nature.
Would you mind reminding me of this? I can't remember where I saw it. Thanks.
I have it thanks Liz.
He LIED in it. We need to get this to the appropriate place so the judge sees this or someone needs to contest this!
He is saying basically HE knows and Lund swore to Anna did not plan “expect” more children!!! SO untrue and I have a ton of proof! Including HKS KNEW she did, tried to with Marshall and still did (LKL in 2002 with HKS sitting right there!
Then we have Kimmie, who WITNESSED that same Will verifying ans always wanted more kids. Birkhead and Eric King and Neven. ALL show hks a liar! He even ends with “are true to my knowledge” !!!! He is lying to the court!
Liar liar pants on fire and the judge NEEDS to know this evidence in my opinion.
In article (if that is what you call them) Nine - #9 of the filing he states ..
9. Shortly after Anna Nicole’s death, on February 19 2007, Anna Nicole’s estate
planning attorney, Erie James Lund, who had drafted the Will, prepared a declaration regarding
Anna Nicole’s intentions as of the time she executed the Will. At the time she executed the Will,
Anna Nicole told Mr. Lund that “although she did not ëpert to have any children in the future,
if she did, she wanted them to share equally in the trust created for Daniel under Article II of the
Will.” (See Exhibit C, Declaration of Eric James Lund, ¶ 6; Estate of Kaufman (1945) 25 Cai.2d
I believe the phrase: *raped Anna* was Stern’s description of the *alleged break-in* of the Horizons by Ford Shelly.
IIRC a video of HOward going through the house with police followed the *Clown* video on Geraldo’s show.
Here is an index of all HK$’ related videos on Youtube
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=+Howard+K.+Stern+&search=Search
A Trust is NOT IMPLIED for other children...in fact...they are specifically excluded.
Rich, dysfunctional families are back in vogue on prime-time television with new shows like Cane and Dirty Sexy Money. But these fictional families have nothing on the real-life tales of feuding billionaire clans, wracked by generational schisms, sibling rivalries, jealousy and greed.
For these wealthy dynasties, there just doesn’t seem to be enough money in the world to convince them to get along. Instead they turn on each other, and very often, take their relatives to court.
We’ve recapped some of the most riveting billionaire family sagas of the past decade, including a then 19-year-old member of the Hyatt’s Pritzker family, who successfully sued her father and almost a dozen other relatives, and a father and his beauty-queen fifth wife suing his son over the family fortune. Exactly half of our favorite feuds involved American families; other fights took place or are taking place in Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, India and Switzerland.
In Pictures: 10 Billionaire Family Feuds
Even people who don’t follow the sagas of the world’s wealthiest most likely got a peek at one of recent history’s most salacious feuds, involving former stripper and Playboy playmate Anna Nicole Smith. For a decade, the tabloid celebrity battled her much-older billionaire stepson, E. Pierce Marshall, for the right to inherit some of the fortune of her late husband, J. Howard Marshall, to whom she was married for just one year. Then, in a bizarre twist, E. Pierce Marshall and Smith died within months of one another. The case was still pending.
In 2002, Liesel Pritzker, then an undergrad at Columbia University, launched a $6 billion lawsuit against her father and 11 older cousins, accusing them of looting her trust funds and those of her brother Matthew. The battle eventually led to the carving up of the family fortune; it was split 11 ways, resulting in 10 more Pritzkers joining the Forbes 400; the most members of any family. Liesel and Matthew are not among the rich-listers, having received a reported $500 million apiece.
A more recent battle involves the world’s 78th most powerful woman and U.S.’ 204th richest person, Marilyn Carlson Nelson. Marilyn, who runs Carlson, the $37 billion (system-wide sales) travel conglomerate founded by her father, is being sued by her son Curtis Nelson. He accuses her and the company of suddenly removing him from his position as president and chief operating officer, unfairly ending his longtime expectation of becoming the company’s chief. He claims he is owed a buy-out of his interest in the business and damages for loss of employment. The company says the suit has no merit and that it was not in its best interest to elect him chief.
After divorcing his fourth wife, Baron Thyssen-Bornemisza, Swiss billionaire and one of the world’s biggest art collectors, signed control of his $2 billion empire over to his son Georg in 1983. Almost two decades later, he and fifth wife Carmen “Tita” Cervera, a former Miss Spain, sued to get it back. A three-year, $60 million court battle followed, ending only after the Baron summoned his long-estranged Swiss family to his Madrid villa in early 2002 to make amends. He died a few months later; his fortune, worth $2 billion in 2002, was allegedly split between his four children, his widow and her son.
Sometimes fighting has a silver lining, as has been the case for Indian brothers Mukesh and Anil Ambani. Unable to get along, the brothers began fighting publicly in late 2004 for control of Reliance Industries, one of India’s largest conglomerates. The situation became so untenable that their mother Kokilaben brokered a court-approved peace settlement that entailed divvying up the family businesses. In 2005, the brothers were worth a combined $7 billion; in our March 2007 survey of billionaires, Mukesh was worth $20.1 billion and ranked 14th in the world. Anil had $18.2 billion and ranked 18th.
But even for billionaires, family fights can be painful. Divorced from his wife of 52 years and now married to a new wife 40 years his junior, Sumner Redstone was sued by his son Brent in November 2006 and by his nephew Michael earlier this year. Redstone settled with Brent for $240 million. The case involving his nephew was dismissed. It was cold comfort: “The two days that Brent and Michael sued me are two of the saddest days of my entire life,” Redstone said.
Lund’s declaration does NOT match what is in the will. It would have been written that way.
I thank God for a life richly blessed, not blessed with riches.
Self worth is not inherited.
Overcoming poverty and adversity is far more rewarding than devouring the fruits of our fathers’ labor.
Sod
No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.
God
What a great post...you deserve a big AMEN for that!
TY
This is a test:
Your teenage granddaughter is coming for a visit. She arrives drunk and confused then collapses. You call 911 for an ambulance.
You have 2 neighbors. One is Virgie, the other Khristine. Who would you call?
Another way of saying...."Larry, I need a sperm donor."
Pretty interesting statement a week after she died.n No "LOVE" in that statement!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.