Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FreeRepublic censorship?
2-17-2010 | Douglas Gross

Posted on 02/17/2010 12:32:03 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy

Edited on 02/19/2010 5:24:02 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

I am a bit bothered by this repeated encounter with censorship on your site. This is the second time that I have encountered censorship on your site. The first time was when I was removed from being allowed to post for expressing that FOX News does not represent true conservatism, and it doesn’t.

John Robinson sent me one kind email saying that the reason was that they typically get trolls and identify them for attacking FOX News. The second email that came from John immediately after was that he wished me the best of luck if I tried to expose the censorship on FreeRepublic against conservatives that apparently exists if you do not bow to the current politicians in power and owe your loyalty to the now less than conservative Republican party. That was rather rude, but I did not pay it much mind.

Today I was surfing and came across a site I do not agree with on all levels, but tried to make a post about some revealing facts that presented on their site about the perversity of Disney.

What was the result of my trying to make this post?

I got a message saying the source was not welcome on FreeRepublic.

As a conservative who would put any average Republican to shame with my traditional values and economic view that makes Reagan look like a two-bit haircut in a black and white movie, I would love to hear why this one is censored. And, as I told John, I can easily take these issues straight to conservatives who do not feel that Club GOP represents conservatism on the Internet with my web development skills.

Here is what I tried to post

I also just noticed that your site has made it impossible to highlight text in fields for posting in trying to copy and paste this link. On the one hand, I do believe in driving out stupidity from the Internet. On the other hand, I believe that only liberal leftist propaganda need be removed. I am beginning to wonder what makes FreeRepublic think that one conservative is acceptable rather than another. I think that conservatives like me would be interested to know the limitations you have obviously coded into publication on your site.

As I said, I do not agree with everything I read on the site I tried to link, but they did a very good job of exposing Disney on the link above.

Think about it.


TOPICS: Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: censorship; conspiracynut; crybaby; freerepublic; ibtz; retread; victorkilo; zot; zuluoscartango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: An.American.Expatriate

Taxes are voluntary in the Constitution. The government doesn’t even have any business knowing how much you make.

Lesson over. I am turning in.


41 posted on 02/17/2010 1:07:50 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy (Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

That would be whichever Amendment said we are guaranteed the right to a Libertarian form of government. No 10?

parsy, who is sleepy


42 posted on 02/17/2010 1:09:18 AM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy

I suggest you try Topix.com
That is a site that is a free-for-all cesspool of everything from ultra conservative to radical Marxist Obots.
Many post on there will surely get your blood boiling.


43 posted on 02/17/2010 1:09:30 AM PST by AlexW (Now in the Philippines . Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

LOL! Don’t start! They’ll be all over it. Like the Invasion of the Body Snatchers, they’ll all turn toward it, start pointing, and making weird, keening noises.

parsy, who is worn out


44 posted on 02/17/2010 1:11:48 AM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy; 50mm; darkwing104

Do the letters “GFY” mean anything to you?

50mm, darkwing...the floor is yours.


45 posted on 02/17/2010 1:12:50 AM PST by GOP_Raider (<----Click over there for a special message from GOP_Raider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Actually it is not an amendment. It is in the original Constitution. Why you think that anyone who is in line with the founding fathers is a Libertarian pro-abort, pro-legalization of drugs is beyond me?


46 posted on 02/17/2010 1:13:11 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy (Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
So - to answer your question about WHY your post was "censored" - have a look at THIS PAGE from that site ....

Truthers? You are posting links to a Truther Site?

47 posted on 02/17/2010 1:14:01 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
Taxes are voluntary in the Constitution..

Ah - which Part says that again?

48 posted on 02/17/2010 1:15:05 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
Such vehemence for a tad of criticism is not entirely civil

Perhaps, but whoever said it was? Sometimes smacking down whiners is just plain fun.

And to come on here whining about how others permit you to utilize their private property isn't entirely conservative. Maybe JimRob would like to have back the part of his paycheck you appropriated for your soapbox, that is actually his right under the constitution.

49 posted on 02/17/2010 1:17:10 AM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
Consider for a moment that those who have been here a lot longer than you may have good reason for holding views which you may not immediately agree with. Suffice to say that some ideas which are new and exciting to you are old and boring and idiotic to others - that's not a slam against you, just a reminder that perhaps you should listen to your virtual elders instead of going out of your way to dis them.

This is Jim Robinson's home, and some topics (and sources thereof) are not welcome in his home - that's not censorship, that's private property rights. You are free to discuss the topic on your own website.

Freedom of the press does not include the irrefusable right to use someone else's press.

50 posted on 02/17/2010 1:17:11 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Pelosi is practically President; the Obama is just her talk show host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy

Experience. I have found that many discontented conservatives are really more libertarian than conservative, and that the stuff we ain’t going far enough on for their liking, is like all economic libertarian stuff that has been snuck in on the GOP and conservative by LICE (Libertarians Infiltrating Conservative Entities)

parsy, who assumes sometimes


51 posted on 02/17/2010 1:18:42 AM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
Actually it is not an amendment. It is in the original Constitution.

Oh, you are one of THOSE conservatives that only thinks that the ORIGINAL constitution is valid...

I guess the following was not a part of the original constitution either:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.


52 posted on 02/17/2010 1:18:56 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Raider

Hmmm...Maybe I overestimated the intelligence of this lot. Post one thing to rock the boat and the whole ship stops sailing. One word said to so much as trouble the waters of this ocean, and everyone comes with complaints against my post. GFY? Well, that’s not the subject of your business if I do.


53 posted on 02/17/2010 1:19:29 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy (Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

My elders?

Pfft...

I am not a young man, and for you to consider me to need to listen to anyone here from what I’ve seen of the vehement replies is just plain stupid.

I suggest you listen to yourself.


54 posted on 02/17/2010 1:21:30 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy (Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
I can’t believe I lowered myself to make an appeal to anyone about this here that were not given the same attention to reasons why they felt the way they did.

Can you put that sentence into English?

55 posted on 02/17/2010 1:21:32 AM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
Maybe I overestimated the intelligence of this lot.

OMG, it's the return of:


56 posted on 02/17/2010 1:24:44 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy

Oh brother, call a whambulance.

Some of us, sometimes browse that left-wing site which starts with “duh” to keep up with what the communists are thinking.

When the marxists refer to their political opposition, they invariably refer to one site, and one site only: Free Republic.

This site is special. It’s also very symbolic, and a lot of socialists would like to find some reason to attack it.

You signed up a couple months ago, and want to post from a “truther” site, and then decide what should and should not be posted on this site?

Who appointed you boss? What’s more conservative, than ownership?

Jim Thompson owns and operates this site.

He makes the rules.

Don’t like it? Then be as conservative as you claim, and start a competing site.

PS: what do you think about Mitt Romney? ;)


57 posted on 02/17/2010 1:24:52 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn; All

So, with that I will leave you with Club GOP. The replies are insulting, not at all about discussion. I recognize Johnny boy has the right to be a better conservative than me, so let him be. I also noticed my comments are being moderated after my post. I am not going to stick around this place if all I am going to get is one track to conservatism. My view of conservatism is much bigger than the GOP or the United States federal government. America is a pathetic model of conservatism, and this is a pathetic dialogue.

Good night all!


58 posted on 02/17/2010 1:25:27 AM PST by ImperialistDaddy (Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy

Clean up Ohio and let the FR to the owners.


59 posted on 02/17/2010 1:26:08 AM PST by bmwcyle (Free the Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImperialistDaddy
I also noticed my comments are being moderated after my post.

Oh, really? I think you're a liar.

60 posted on 02/17/2010 1:26:40 AM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson