Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan to Promote Ultra High-Def TV
tvpredictions.com ^ | October 28, 2010 | Philip Swann

Posted on 10/31/2010 5:41:05 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave

Japanese broadcaster NHK is planning public displays of its Ultra High-Definition TV system which supposedly offers a picture 16 times clearer than today's HDTVs.

That's according to an article by The Hollywood Reporter.

However, before you get too excited, the publication adds that it could be 2020 before you see UHDTV in anyone's living room.

Still, NHK says it will shoot some of the 2012 London Olympics in the format and then transmit the images to public displays in Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The Hollywood Reporter writes that the ultra-clear picture delivers detail so precise that it almost appears three-dimensional. The format offers 8K resolution; 7,680 horizontal pixels x 4,320 vertical pixels, says the publication. Today's HDTVs deliver about 2,000 horizontal pixels.

One obstacle in UHDTV's way: To display the ultra-clear image, sets should be in the 80-90 inch range.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hdtv; uhdtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2010 5:41:09 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; aft_lizard; AJMaXx; Alice in Wonderland; american colleen; ...
Pinging the HDTV list..
HDTV pings!

2 posted on 10/31/2010 5:42:29 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
What???

Now I have to go out and spend another 2000 bucks on a big screen TV!

3 posted on 10/31/2010 5:42:49 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Overkill. Most HD sports programs are actually broadcast in 720.


4 posted on 10/31/2010 5:44:15 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

I still have a tube TV.

Amazingly, I can see and enjoy the broadcast images thereupon.

The distance from 99.95% quality and 99.999% to get the HD stuff is pretty small — much less the 99.99999% suggested by the technology in the OP.


5 posted on 10/31/2010 5:45:02 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-Reader: omnipotence at home, impotence abroad (Weekly Standard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
...still waiting for Smell-O-Vision
6 posted on 10/31/2010 5:45:42 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus - Domari Nolo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
At a certain point, increases in "resolution" are irrelevant.

If all you want to do with a camera, for instance, is make 4"x5" prints, a few megapixels is adequate.

Higher resolution TV is only relevant if you want a screen the size of your wall. A 32" screen it 1080i is about as hi-def as you're going to get.

A 55" screen at the same resolution is not nearly as clear, but 2160i would be.

7 posted on 10/31/2010 5:47:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I still have a tube TV.

Amazingly, I can see and enjoy the broadcast images thereupon.

The distance from 99.95% quality and 99.999% to get the HD stuff is pretty small

Not exactly sure how you came up with your percentages, but to suggest that there isn't much difference between standard-def and high-def television is a bit absurd.

8 posted on 10/31/2010 5:49:13 PM PDT by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Ha ha, I still haven’t bought a HDTV — I gave my space on the technology treadmill to somebody else a long long time ago.

It helps my wallet that nobody yet has actually built an HDTV where the frames always update properly. I can’t stand seeing a close-up where every part of the face changes expression independently over eight or nine frames.


9 posted on 10/31/2010 5:49:51 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

$2000 in 2020?

More like $60,000 + obamataxes, may get you closer to ownership.

Remember when plasma TV’s first arrived on the market, they were close to $12,000, (but dropped in price very quickly).


10 posted on 10/31/2010 5:51:20 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Exactly. I’ll stick with what I have.


11 posted on 10/31/2010 5:52:02 PM PDT by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

The real purpose would be to get expensive film out of motion picture production.


12 posted on 10/31/2010 5:53:21 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Great, we get to see even more wrinkles, blackheads and wild hairs on newscasters’ faces than with HDTV.

Short of some revolution in content, I fail to see the value of the expenditure.


13 posted on 10/31/2010 5:53:23 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

This is going to put a lot of newscasters with acne out of work forever.


14 posted on 10/31/2010 5:53:40 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

A lot of people’s vision (mine included) is not good enough to appreciate such ultra-high resolution.


15 posted on 10/31/2010 5:57:46 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

8K?!


16 posted on 10/31/2010 5:59:50 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
The average human eye does not have the resolving power to take full advantage of the iPhone4 display. The application for UHD would necessarily be similar to IMAX, where the eye can roam around the image. Film IMAX is equivalent to UHD, about 7,000 pixels horizontal at 48fps, which is eqiivalent to about 60p digital.

So I think that this is a limited market, just as IMAX is/was. We'll be wearing HD glasses a decade before we'll be watching UHD.

17 posted on 10/31/2010 6:00:24 PM PDT by Praxeologue (io)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
The Hollywood Reporter writes that the ultra-clear picture delivers detail so precise that it almost appears three-dimensional.

It would probably be better than what passes for 3d today. However, true HD content today looks almost 3d.

18 posted on 10/31/2010 6:02:15 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I have a 13” color set from 1978 (complete with tuner dials) that I use sometimes. Got it from a thrift store some years ago. It’s fun to hook the digital cable box up to it and watch football.

Nothing against HDTV, but I still wish manufacturers hadn’t discontinued CRT TVs. They didn’t want to spend the money to put digital tuners in them (now a requirement).


19 posted on 10/31/2010 6:02:55 PM PDT by Strk321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

>>Not exactly sure how you came up with your percentages, but to suggest that there isn’t much difference between standard-def and high-def television is a bit absurd.<<

“Absurd” is a bit over the top. I assure you my enjoyment of what I watch is excellent. So you posit a difference without a distinction. The measure of the experience is the enjoyment factor. If I enjoy the content then I am missing nothing.


20 posted on 10/31/2010 6:03:41 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-Reader: omnipotence at home, impotence abroad (Weekly Standard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson