Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utica (NY) Police Officers Caught on Tape (Planting drugs?)
Youtube ^ | Jan 2, 2012 | Youtube

Posted on 01/03/2012 10:04:29 AM PST by thefactor

I don't think there are any real articles written about this yet. Seems to have occurred about 11 months ago and is just coming to light. The action occurs at exactly the 1 minute mark.

As many of you know, I'm a cop. I complain about the anti-cop posts and posters, but I also have the responsibility to bring things like this to light. If this went down, this guy needs to be fired and sent to prison. I have also heard that one of the cops is the son-in-law of the new Mayor.


TOPICS: Agriculture; Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: corruption; deadleoswalking; donutwatch; drugs; lping; newyork; police; rapeofliberty; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
I did a search and I think this video just came out recently so I think I'm first. I can't hotlink the video. If someone can, please do. That's one thing I've never learned.
1 posted on 01/03/2012 10:04:32 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thefactor
I believe that if the investigation proves the guilt of the officer involved, he DEFINITELY should be sent to prison for a long time.

That said, I also would bet that some ambulance-chasing parasite (Lawyer), will NOT sue the cop for the damage to the target accused drug buyer, but rather will cost Taxpayers a ton of money when the City is sued, and the payout comes from the Taxpayer.

In ANY case of LEO malfeasance/criminal activity, I believe ONLY the inividual should be allowed to be held accountable (monetarily), and the Litigation Lotto should NOT be on the backs of Taxpayers.

2 posted on 01/03/2012 10:09:35 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

http://youtu.be/i7oenshcwPk


3 posted on 01/03/2012 10:09:38 AM PST by 109ACS (If this be Treason, then make the most of it. Patrick Henry, May 1765)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

“and the Litigation Lotto should NOT be on the backs of Taxpayers. “

I’d agree unless they had help committing the crime or in covering it up.


4 posted on 01/03/2012 10:12:11 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; driftdiver; US Navy Vet; B4Ranch

This should be right up your alley. I defend cops all the time, but I try to be fair.


5 posted on 01/03/2012 10:13:26 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

These guys are real criminal geniuses. They cannot even plant evidence without being caught by their own dashcam...


6 posted on 01/03/2012 10:24:45 AM PST by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; bamahead

ping


7 posted on 01/03/2012 10:32:52 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

I saw the video and the officer does appear to pull a baggy out of his pocket and place it in the vehicle. If this is the case, ALL of the previous arrests made by this officer have to be scrutinized. All of his previous sworn testimony has to be scrutinized. Very frightening stuff, the factor and I applaud you for bringing it to the attention of FReepers.


8 posted on 01/03/2012 10:49:30 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Highly suspiscious activity occurs at the 1:00 mark in the video.

Thank you to 'thefactor' (an HONEST cop) for the ping!



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

9 posted on 01/03/2012 10:49:46 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Thank you for the ping!


10 posted on 01/03/2012 10:54:14 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

thanks for posting, hopefully he gets what he deserves


11 posted on 01/03/2012 11:01:37 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Maybe he was under the influence himself, because that was stupid beyond words to do it right in front of the camera.

No city-supplied lawyer.
Trial.
Prison.
Forfeiture of pension.


12 posted on 01/03/2012 11:01:47 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Police Officers who do the right thing don’t need to be defended. Their actions speak for them. Its POS’s like these two that give the honest and hard working ones, of which there are few these days, a bad name. All they did was stoke the anti-cop fervor some more.


13 posted on 01/03/2012 11:17:11 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]





Spend a Lot of Time On Free Republic
Eating Like a Bird? (Twice Your Weight Each Day)
Give Back a Little and Donate


Sponsoring FReepers will contribute $10
Each time a new monthly donor signs up

14 posted on 01/03/2012 11:55:50 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
and the Litigation Lotto should NOT be on the backs of Taxpayers.

I’d agree unless they had help committing the crime or in covering it up.

The taxpayers didn't help commit the crime or cover it up. The officer and any accessories should be individually responsible for any civil judgment.

15 posted on 01/03/2012 12:14:37 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies; driftdiver
The taxpayers didn't help commit the crime or cover it up. The officer and any accessories should be individually responsible for any civil judgment.

It's attitudes like this that allow goons with badges to get away with this kind of crap.

The elected city officials (read: mayor, city council) hold the cops' leashes.

The taxpayers elect the officials holding the cops' leashes.

If the taxpayers re-elect the officials without holding them personally responsible for cleaning up the dirty police, then the taxpayers should not complain about having to foot the bill when dirty goons with badges commit crimes.

Too many good taxpayers go back to sleep after casting their votes when they should be continually watching the elected officials to make sure the officials they elected are doing the taxpayers' bidding the way the taxpayers want it done.

It's really as simple as that.

16 posted on 01/03/2012 12:26:14 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

May I suggest that you bring this to the attention of local media in Utica?


17 posted on 01/03/2012 12:36:13 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker; JustSayNoToNannies; driftdiver

IANAL, but I believe that the legal principle involved is *respondeat superior*:

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Respondeat+superior

tl;dr: The taxpayers are on the hook.


18 posted on 01/03/2012 12:39:22 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

There has to be a component of individual responsibility. I agree the City Leaders are ultimately responsible but there is already a law against planting evidence. If the cop doesn’t pay a criminal and civil penalty there is nothing to stop them.


19 posted on 01/03/2012 12:51:21 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

The taxpayers hired the cop, trained the cop, and allowed him to carry the authority. The city is certainly part of the equation.


20 posted on 01/03/2012 12:52:38 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson