Skip to comments.Australian children to be sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law
Posted on 03/08/2012 6:29:49 AM PST by Quix
The Government of Western Australia's Mental Health Commission (WAMHC) has basically conjured up a proposal for new mental health legislation that bypasses parental involvement in the mental health treatment process, and instead tasks children under age 18, and of any age, with making the decision about whether or not to be sterilized, or whether or not to have their brain tissue destroyed with psychosurgery procedures. If a "mental health professional" can convince children that they need such treatments for their own good, in other words, than Australia's youngest members of society will be open game for the eugenicist agenda.
It almost sounds like the plot of a sick movie, but it is all true and fully documented right in the WAMHC Mental Health Bill 2011, which you can access here:
Eugenicists want to sterilize Australian children without ever telling the kids' parents In the twisted minds of those who have seized positions of power all over the world, separating children from their parents and performing medical experiments on them in secret is a fully acceptable form of "medicine." And this form of child abuse is exactly what WAMHC has proposed in its new mental health bill.
The rest of the article is at the referent link.
Yep. Everything old is new again.
Paging Dr. Davenport, Dr. Sanger, Dr. Mengele...
Paging Dr. Davenport, Dr. Sanger, Dr. Mengele, Dr Lucifer ...
Despite their charming accent and cute critters, Australia has long been a country where the government has given itself the power to do whatever they want with human life, without conscience or restraint.
It’s available on Amazon. Here’s a link to its Wiki page (hope it takes!)
Ah, Darwinism - the gift that keeps on killing.
That’s been my impression.
Of course . . . there’s also . . . the globalist power center at Pine Gap
where Stan Deyo worked on exotic craft for the globalists.
Of course, folks who choke on more truth than skim milk should avoid such facts and sites. They might lose sleep in their Laz-Y-Boys.
I should check hulu to see if it’s there . . . or youtube.
. . . and/or . . .
Darwinism/ willful blindness/ cluelessness/ habitual-head-in-the-sandism/ grossly extreme ignorance/ terminal stupidity/ myopic tunnel vision that sees no further than the individual's own ego/arrogance/ . . .
I've about given up on some FREEPERS. What's shocking is how big a percentage such cluelessness seems to reside in. I used to think that FREEPERS were the best informed and most awake. And maybe they still are. However, if what I see so routinely on here is any evidence . . . that's NOT saying much. May God have mercy. Sigh.
OK, I’ll bite: Is it possible to discuss some of the smaller but actual real issues— that do present some unique and difficult problems— without jumping all the way to Dr. Mengele in the first round?
They are talking about adolescents with extreme mental retardation. These people as they mature are not capable of understanding much about sexuality at all, and are tragically taken advantage of and used by predators at alarming rates. It’s heartbreaking— and I wouldn’t automatically jump to sterilization as a right answer. But somehow there needs to be a way to have a frank discussion of all the facets of the problem and all the possible elements of solutions, without that discussion slipping instantly into death-camp territory.
Some more mildly retarded people indeed do successfully move into adulthood, marriage and even child-rearing. I’ve seen it happen over and over. But for the severely retarded, a girl with the body and chemistry of a seventeen year old, but the mind of a toddler... there are many cruelties being visited upon her already and it’s reasonable to think rationally about what additional cruelties there may be and whether they can be avoided.
I’m not sure I know the answer, but no answers come out of a discussion that is shut down before it even starts.
All the more reason why the parents should be involved.
I understand your points.
However, I don’t have much patience with
tyrannically satanic government mandated
that are MUCH WORSE than the problem.
Do you even believe there is a satanic global government increasingly forcing itself onto the public world stage?
I have long been convinced that God doesn’t create such poor afflictions but He does use them to teach the rest of us wisdom and compassion.
Stop the presses.
Sound the alarm.
I agree with you.
Given the situations you gave as an example, you actually accept the idea of giving them legal responsibility for a decision as important as that?
I think the bigger questions are about what can be done without -their- substantive consent, where they cannot possibly understand the whole situation. That gets into some tricky ground.
I don’t understand why parents wouldn’t have to be involved, of course. I kinda’ jumped over that and was going for a different point. It doesn’t make any sense that parents would be left out.
Evidently some folks think that . . . CONTRARY TO SCIENTIFIC FACT . . . it's quite reasonable to . . .
set a terrarium with a rainbow colored highly poisonous viper in it down in front of an 8-16 year old and let the child decide whether they want to take it out and play with it or not.
It is provable that the judgment centers of the brain DO NOT fully mature until around age 25-30.
The globalists know that it's idiocy to give children such choices. They advocate it deliberately as a way to destroy the family; destroy the Judeo/Christian culture; destroy society . . . to make it easier to raise the satanic globalist world government and society on top of the ashes of the 'old order.'
They sell well the lie that their Babylonian satanism is a "New" world order.
I dont understand why parents wouldnt have to be involved, of course. I kinda jumped over that and was going for a different point. It doesnt make any sense that parents would be left out.
"Australian children to be sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law"
You missed addressing both the title and subject of the article. There's nothing "tricky" about this issue, nor is there a "bigger" issue than this, imho.
THX for your kind reply.
God’s best to you, Bro.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.