Posted on 05/17/2012 7:31:10 PM PDT by No One Special
Just heard this on the Rusty Humphries Radio Show. Reason is the recent revelation re Obama's birthplace listed as Kenya on his agent's info.
I'm not sure if I like this possiibility. Seems like we the sheeple are being played.
Wonder what sort of odds places like Intrade would give on a potential Plin/Clinton matchup?
Ugh.
No she isn’t
They could always move Frank Lautenberg into the top spot.
“This explains all the sudden faggotry.”
They must cease this faggotry at once!
“Bieber’s Tune.”
Beeber Stune?
During the last presidential campaign, in August, 2008, Bill Clinton was asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be president.
Clinton's rather odd, cryptic reply:
"The constitution sets qualification for the president. And then the people decide who they think would be the better president."
Bill Clinton made this reference to the Constitution shortly after America's latest fad, the "community organizer" from Chicago, popped up out of nowhere and stole his wife's destiny by winning, in rather sleazy fashion including the shameless playing of "the race card", the Democrat nomination for President.
It has been my opinion since that time that the Clintons know something, and that it was they who quite deliberately fanned the flames of controversy over Obama's birth. Remember, it was a prominent Hillary Clinton supporter, Philadelphia lawyer Philip Berg, who launched *the first* Obama eligibility lawsuit. That lawsuit was filed in August of 2008, shortly after Bill Clinton made the curious reference to the Constitution when asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be President. Coincidental timing? Sure it was.
2016? She'll be 70 years old, and four years out of politics by that time. She's well past her sell-by date, and no one except aging baby boomer lesbians would support her in a second presidential bid anyway. Her last chance was in 2008, but that grand plan was thwarted by the Boy King, who has now permanently upstaged her.
She's been asked whether she'd consider running again, and she has answered "No", every single time. Unequivocally so, I might add. Don't bet the farm on another Hillary run.
Bfl
It has legs with people who can actually think but I think those are in short supply. The union-driven school system has produced far too many unusually ignorant people.
Just had Olympic training there.
“In fact I’ve never had a doubt Zippo was never supposed to be president in the first place.”
I agree. I thought the DNC was going to trade the blacks in for hispanics and somehow O pulled off the nomination. The DNC won’t be able to keep both for long.
At this point, the Hildebeest's orientation, not to mention she herself, is a historical footnote, Mrs Weiner notwithstanding.
Good luck!! I love the Olympics.
Is this “news” getting out (finally about Barry) the “wound to the head” of government? Globalization is probably more advanced than anyone knows at this point...should we start looking for the anti-”savior” to appear soon to “heal” the “wound to the head”?
Government, Education, Finance, and Religion;
An intense increase in knowledge.
Meanwhile, while looking east, I can see the swarmers swarming; soon, the consumers will start to consume.
“They’re officially out of people.”
Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein: the first American Triumvirate.
Makes at least as much sense as a Palin-Clinton matchup.
I don’t disagree with any of that, however, you are missing the vast Boomer constituency. Now that they are old, old is cool. Just saying, as someone who is pushing 70. Also, for those with the will to power, it doesn’t matter how old they are.
I didn’t say she would run or win, though. Just consider it enough for one final round. She has enough money to make an acceptable final personal presentation. Lots of ego there.
OBAMA,OBAMA,OBAMA, Yes We Can!!!!!!
There may be something to that as Van Jones has just come out against Holder
While they were romping up these stories on Bush firing the USA’s, Sharon Eubanks (SP?) with CREW made the comment the she had heard there were problems in the Civil Rights Division at the DoJ. The MSM then started framing the story “Did Bush fire the USA’s to cover up civil rights violations” meaning “was Bush covering up for police violating the civil rights of blacks”?
Let's go back to Clinton's firing of the USA’s in 1993.
Somewhere around 1988, B Clinton while gov of Ark, was sued by DoJ for ordering his state troopers to “Racial Profile”. In the settlement Clinton aggrieved to stop the racial profiling, he didn't.
In 1991 with the R King beating, Bush ordered a review of all complaints filed against police with the FBI for the previous 5 years. Those complaints go through the Civil Rights Division at DoJ. There were 15,000 complaints filed and only around 42 were pursued in court.
One of those pursued was against B Clinton for ordering racial profiling. Hillary has been on a vendetta ever since to truy and pin Racial Profiling on repubs.
The dems used the fact that out of 15,000 complaints filed and only about 42 were pursued in court, to make the claim that this proved that repubs were racist and were covering up for police violating blacks civil rights. You starting to see how Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was supposed to work? They were attempting to recreate a R King type issue.
Following the LA riots in 1992, the FBI claimed the review of the complaints against police showed there was nothing in the files. IIRC in June of 1992, Bush ordered the USA’s to review the complaints.
Leading into the 92 election, the dems demanded Bush release the content of the FBI files. Bush never released the content of the files because Perot was in the 92 election. Bush could have wiped out Clinton by releasing the files, but Perot would more than likely ended up president. Bush never released the files.
When Reno was nominated for AG she said the first thing she would do was release the content of the FBI files under review by the USA’s, she didn't, she fired the USA’s instead.
Now you starting to see how Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was supposed to work. Simple projection. Accuse Bush of doing what B Clinton had done.
While they were busy creating the myth that Bush had fired the USA’s to cover up for police violiting blacks civil rights, Al Sharpton was busy ginning up civil unrest with the Jenna “6” and the phony “Noose” campaign.
Hillary was going to recreate the R King race riots of 1992 as a way of launching her into the WH.
Everything was going real good until the VT shooting bumped the stories out of the news for a week. The public lost interest and they could never get it back.
The news media then started pushing BO for president. There was a group of journalist that called themselves JournOlist that was pushing BO for president over Hillary.
Here's where they, JournOlist, screwed up with there story that they always supported BO over Hillary.
JournOlist was started in February of 2007, Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was derailed by the VT shooting in April 2007.
The same journalist the started JournOlist in February 2007 to push BO for president were carrying Hillary's water in her dirty tricks campaign until April 2007.
BO was a always Hillary's plan “B” for orchestrating race riots prior to the election.
What's coming down right now is Hillary's plan “B” from the 2008 election.
Have BO declared ineligible as a way of orchestrating massive race riots prior to the election.
While they were romping up these stories on Bush firing the USA’s, Sharon Eubanks (SP?) with CREW made the comment the she had heard there were problems in the Civil Rights Division at the DoJ. The MSM then started framing the story “Did Bush fire the USA’s to cover up civil rights violations” meaning “was Bush covering up for police violating the civil rights of blacks”?
Let's go back to Clinton's firing of the USA’s in 1993.
Somewhere around 1988, B Clinton while gov of Ark, was sued by DoJ for ordering his state troopers to “Racial Profile”. In the settlement Clinton aggrieved to stop the racial profiling, he didn't.
In 1991 with the R King beating, Bush ordered a review of all complaints filed against police with the FBI for the previous 5 years. Those complaints go through the Civil Rights Division at DoJ. There were 15,000 complaints filed and only around 42 were pursued in court.
One of those pursued was against B Clinton for ordering racial profiling. Hillary has been on a vendetta ever since to truy and pin Racial Profiling on repubs.
The dems used the fact that out of 15,000 complaints filed and only about 42 were pursued in court, to make the claim that this proved that repubs were racist and were covering up for police violating blacks civil rights. You starting to see how Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was supposed to work? They were attempting to recreate a R King type issue.
Following the LA riots in 1992, the FBI claimed the review of the complaints against police showed there was nothing in the files. IIRC in June of 1992, Bush ordered the USA’s to review the complaints.
Leading into the 92 election, the dems demanded Bush release the content of the FBI files. Bush never released the content of the files because Perot was in the 92 election. Bush could have wiped out Clinton by releasing the files, but Perot would more than likely ended up president. Bush never released the files.
When Reno was nominated for AG she said the first thing she would do was release the content of the FBI files under review by the USA’s, she didn't, she fired the USA’s instead.
Now you starting to see how Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was supposed to work. Simple projection. Accuse Bush of doing what B Clinton had done.
While they were busy creating the myth that Bush had fired the USA’s to cover up for police violiting blacks civil rights, Al Sharpton was busy ginning up civil unrest with the Jenna “6” and the phony “Noose” campaign.
Hillary was going to recreate the R King race riots of 1992 as a way of launching her into the WH.
Everything was going real good until the VT shooting bumped the stories out of the news for a week. The public lost interest and they could never get it back.
The news media then started pushing BO for president. There was a group of journalist that called themselves JournOlist that was pushing BO for president over Hillary.
Here's where they, JournOlist, screwed up with there story that they always supported BO over Hillary.
JournOlist was started in February of 2007, Hillary's dirty tricks campaign was derailed by the VT shooting in April 2007.
The same journalist the started JournOlist in February 2007 to push BO for president were carrying Hillary's water in her dirty tricks campaign until April 2007.
BO was a always Hillary's plan “B” for orchestrating race riots prior to the election.
What's coming down right now is Hillary's plan “B” from the 2008 election.
Have BO declared ineligible as a way of orchestrating massive race riots prior to the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.