Rage Monkey is *PISSED*!!!! (#12 in a series)

Original Content | October 17, 2012 | By Laz A. Mataz

[Sarah]

Laz, What’s Rage Monkey?

[MarkL]

In my dreams, immediately before the start of the next debate, an announcer comes on and says, "I'm afraid that the moderator that the DNC had picked to skewer Mitt Romney is not available at this moment (his head finally exploded). The only moderator we could find at this late time to replace him is Megyn Kelley, of the Fox News Network. The debate will have to be delayed for 20 minutes while President Obama showers and gets a fresh pair of underwear.

Ok, that's not my only dream that features Megyn Kelly, but it is the only one that features the debates.

Mark

[Lazamataz]

What is Rage Monkey??!?

Rage Monkey is a very VERY angry monkey who has finally had it up to HERE, with the biased press, the do-nothing government programs, the hateful Sociopathic Democrats, and especially one particular Kenyan half-black Homosexual Islamic Marxist America-hating Nihilist. More, from the Rage Monkey Facebook fan page: Rage Monkey speaks truth to power, and asks the hard questions of the day. Conservative politically, this wonderfully articulate simian challenges us to think.

[Lazamataz]

Right. It seemed like she felt the need to be impartial. (Rats leaving the ship.) It went wrong when she opined about Libya/ Terror, but she did pretty well.

Incorrect.

At least two times, Mitt should have had the closing statement, but didn't. One time he even mentioned it. Also, the Libya/ Terror thing. Finally, she selected the questions and most of them had liberal assumptions, and the ones meant for Mitt had a sharp liberalism to them.

Candy Boo Boo Child was heinous.

[Lazamataz]

Added!

[American Constitutionalist]

I have no words to explain the utter contempt I have for the media after last night’s hail Mary pass of THE CROW to Obama.

[American Constitutionalist]

MSM’s hail Mary pass to help Obama win this debate.

[Fast Moving Angel]

LMAO ... size matters :-) (well done!!)

[CitizenM]

And don’t forget - all you rage monkeys - when the economy does poorly, gas prices go down.

Yeah, I am still trying to figure out Obama's logic on his comment about gas prices being lower when he took office...because the economy was heading for a crisis. Now we know his plan...keep the prices high, avoid another recession, LOL.

And what about telling that college student who asked about job availability when he graduates...that he (Obama) is working to increase jobs in manufacturing. LOL, I am sure that fellow wants to work on the assembly line after four years of college. I bet he's not going to vote for Obama, nor send him his resume, LOL

[TheOldLady]

Another great rant by Rage Monkey, God bless him!

Masterful handling of the thread as well, Mr. RM Moderator.

Candy Boo Boo? Booooo!

[bigheadfred]

It was affirmative action at its finest.

Lets hear it for the boy

[Hodar]

If we are going to have biased “Moderators”; why can’t the RNC get 1 option out of the 3? I’d nominate Rush Limbaugh to be a Moderator. I firmly believe that he would not only be “fair” - but also believe him to be immenently more qualified, and would be bound by a sense of “Honor and Duty” to give BOTH sides equal footing.

[Shimmer1]

ping

[Sarah]

yeah. I don;t know whay I was thinking. Looks worse a day ;ater

[Lazamataz]

Candy Boo Boo Child gots her Go Go Juice!

[Two Kids' Dad]

Joe, I think that for all future debates it would be completely fair for each side to be able to “voir dire” up to 5 so-called moderators they think would be unfairly biased toward their opponent, then select 10 names that they’d find acceptable and compare the lists. If there are enough names that show up on both lists, those are the moderators. If there aren’t enough mutually acceptable names, a random draw can be used based on the criterion that no single network would be allowed to moderate more than one debate.