Posted on 10/17/2012 5:39:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz
Laz, What’s Rage Monkey?
Ok, that's not my only dream that features Megyn Kelly, but it is the only one that features the debates.
Mark
Rage Monkey is a very VERY angry monkey who has finally had it up to HERE, with the biased press, the do-nothing government programs, the hateful Sociopathic Democrats, and especially one particular Kenyan half-black Homosexual Islamic Marxist America-hating Nihilist. More, from the Rage Monkey Facebook fan page: Rage Monkey speaks truth to power, and asks the hard questions of the day. Conservative politically, this wonderfully articulate simian challenges us to think.
Incorrect.
At least two times, Mitt should have had the closing statement, but didn't. One time he even mentioned it. Also, the Libya/ Terror thing. Finally, she selected the questions and most of them had liberal assumptions, and the ones meant for Mitt had a sharp liberalism to them.
Candy Boo Boo Child was heinous.
Added!
I have no words to explain the utter contempt I have for the media after last night’s hail Mary pass of THE CROW to Obama.
MSM’s hail Mary pass to help Obama win this debate.
LMAO ... size matters :-) (well done!!)
Yeah, I am still trying to figure out Obama's logic on his comment about gas prices being lower when he took office...because the economy was heading for a crisis. Now we know his plan...keep the prices high, avoid another recession, LOL.
And what about telling that college student who asked about job availability when he graduates...that he (Obama) is working to increase jobs in manufacturing. LOL, I am sure that fellow wants to work on the assembly line after four years of college. I bet he's not going to vote for Obama, nor send him his resume, LOL
Another great rant by Rage Monkey, God bless him!
Masterful handling of the thread as well, Mr. RM Moderator.
Candy Boo Boo? Booooo!
If we are going to have biased “Moderators”; why can’t the RNC get 1 option out of the 3? I’d nominate Rush Limbaugh to be a Moderator. I firmly believe that he would not only be “fair” - but also believe him to be immenently more qualified, and would be bound by a sense of “Honor and Duty” to give BOTH sides equal footing.
ping
yeah. I don;t know whay I was thinking. Looks worse a day ;ater
Joe, I think that for all future debates it would be completely fair for each side to be able to “voir dire” up to 5 so-called moderators they think would be unfairly biased toward their opponent, then select 10 names that they’d find acceptable and compare the lists. If there are enough names that show up on both lists, those are the moderators. If there aren’t enough mutually acceptable names, a random draw can be used based on the criterion that no single network would be allowed to moderate more than one debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.