Send these two women, just as soon as their of legal age.Malia Ann Obama /məˈliːə/, born on July 4, 1998, and Natasha Obama (known as Sasha /ˈsɑːʃə/), born on June 10, 2001.
Posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:25 AM PST by central_va
If you want to stop these pro women in combat lunes dead in their tracks ask them this hypothetical question:
You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?
You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?
I understand. Some leftists are so dismissive of reality that I really wonder how any of them ever manage to reproduce the old-fashioned way.
When the left gets through, they will have a military which can’t efficiently or effectively fight foreign enemies, but will be a perfect force for keeping the citizenry in line, especially if they manage to disarm us of everything more powerful than a slingshot. They understand the “frog in hot water” concept as well as we do (those of us who do), and that’s how they’ll do it-nibble away at the “edges” of the Second Amendment, with the naive complicity of many conservatives, until they’ve gutted it. Then the new politically correct, politicised military will keep us line without much effort.
Send these two women, just as soon as their of legal age.Have the women demonstrate how to pick up the dead weight of an injured man and carry that person 1 mile. OK. 1/2 mile. OK. 1/4 mile.....
OK. How about the guy’s gear?
For sure. What is so fair and equal about women getting the option for combat. If it's going to be fair and equal take the option away. They will back track on this issue faster than Speedy Gonzales!
You need to get out more. Men are indeed naturally stronger, and have a much higher potential for strength than women. However, if you're 59 and don't work out, you'd be surprised at the number of women who'd make short work of you.
Using the bench press as a standard that almost anyone can understand: Without the aid of a bench shirt there are a lot of women who can bench in the 300's, a few even the 400's. Less than half that of their male counterparts, but still several times more than your average cube rat.
I don't disagree with your underlying principle. However, like most, you don't grasp how easily an in shape woman can surpass an out of shape man. The effects of being out of shape are far worse than your average couch potato will ever admit.
He can't answer the question. He is a hypocrite.
Sure I can. You’d choose the faggy girly one. As I said I misread the thread.
Answer the question, it is simple enough. Quit ducking like a coward. The question is FOR YOU not me. Idiot.
Answer the question, it is simple enough. Quit ducking like a coward. The question is FOR YOU not me. Idiot.
??? I did answer it. I’d choose the faggy girly one. What is your problem?
Why?
> Those queers would blow them away, and the carpet munchers would pull the rug out from under them.
LOL
Or ask about how well they’d expect an all-woman NFL team to do?
Why what...would I pick the faggy girl one or why do I ask about your problem?
Why would you pick that one?
Because they would probably be easier to defeat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.