Posted on 11/06/2013 4:02:21 PM PST by nickcarraway
In one giant leap for gender equality, an expert says that women are more meticulous, thorough and advanced than their male counterparts when it comes to murder.
During an interview with Der Spiegel's Rainer Leurs, forensic scientist Sigrun Rossmanith said her work with female killers revealed that they're simply superior from a tactical standpoint. Keeping the stereotypes alive, Rossmanith said that men occasionally target total strangers and often rely on brute strength to execute their kills. As for women, she says their victims are hardly ever strangers and they account for their lack of strength and size by incapacitating them. They have to get creative with it.
She might as well have just come out and said male killers typically wear blue and female killers usually wear pink.
Rossmanith, who even pondered her own potential as a serial killer, ended the interview with a gem: "I am personally more afraid of the vengeance of women than that of men." Because hell hath no fury like a woman scorned; in fact, that woman is the most dangerous person on the planet.
Instapundit has a quote he likes along the lines of....it’s OK to conduct a study that finds differences between the sexes as long as you phrase you results in a way that makes women sound better.
This is a perfect example.
Great. I'm glad she's not my neighbor.
Must be a liberal. So stupid he thinks Genders different = "Gender equality".
There are at least four songs with the title “Evil Woman” (ELO, Doobies, Spooky Tooth, and Chase), and I can’t think of one called “Evil Man” — never wondered why? :’)
There ain’t nothin’funny about a woman with a gun.
“Rossmanith said that men occasionally target total strangers ... As for women, she says their victims are hardly ever strangers”
Actually, this means that the men are being more tactical killers. Killing people you know is the quickest way to ensure that you are included in the suspect pool.
Yes, but it’s much harder for a woman to be convicted of murder, and they get much shorter sentences.
And that’s just one title... there is “Devil Woman” by Cliff Richard, “American Woman” by the Guess Who, “Woman is the Devil” by the Doors, “Evil Ways” by Santana, “Maneater” by Hall & Oates, all with similar themes.
My personal favorite is “Mother-In-Law” by Ernie K Doe, because it’s catchy and funny at the same time that it is viciously insulting (”Satan should be her name... to me, they’re about the same”).
Yes, that is true. Women always have the go-to “battered woman” defense that they can usually trot out if they kill their lovers, to at least mitigate the sentencing, if not get them off entirely.
Meanwhile, a woman will sucker her prey into marriage and slowly feed on his soul and will to live - for years, until it kills him.
/s
I think men should get even by refusing to have sex with women.
Maybe that’s what she wants you to think.
I think there`s 80% compliance on that strategy already...
Nor has anyone ever made a film titled “Mean Boys”.
Some intrepid researcher, if they do a study where men come out looking better, should pull all those bigots' pants down in public by publishing the study with the data reversed so women come out looking better, then wait for everyone to applaud it and several of them to peer review the study and swear publicly to its objectiveness and sound design and execution. THEN, "discover" that the data had accidentally been reversed. All those guys who just vouched for the study would be left standing there holding their dick, because they examined it and said it was a good study.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.