Posted on 01/20/2015 8:40:02 AM PST by Pelham
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Many of the students at Kingsley Elementary School in a low-income neighborhood of Los Angeles eat breakfast and lunch provided by the school. For the nearly 100 enrolled in the after-school program, another meal is served: supper.
The nation’s second largest school district is doubling the number of students served dinner, with an eye toward eventually offering it at every school. It’s a growing trend: Nationwide, the number of students served dinner or an after-school snack soared to nearly 1 million last year.
“When kids are hungry, they don’t pay attention,” said Bennett Kayser, a member of the Los Angeles Unified School District board, which was announcing the expansion Thursday. “This is something that should have started years ago.”
Thirteen states and the District of Columbia began offering students dinner as part of a pilot program expanded to all states after the 2010 passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. Schools where at least half the students are low-income and qualify for free or reduced-price lunch are reimbursed for each supper by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, at a rate often significantly higher than the cost of the meal.
In the 2014 fiscal year, 104 million suppers were served to students, up from about 19 million in 2009. Participation is still lower than in the nation’s long-running breakfast and lunch programs, which serve more than 12 million and 31 million students, respectively.
The introduction of dinner to school routines is unique in that it could take the place of what many consider a near-sacred ritual: The family dinner.
Proponents say that since many students stay on campus until the early evening hours, it makes sense to provide an additional meal. In the case of the neediest students, they might not get anything to eat after class other than what is offered at school.
Research on family dinners has shown a plethora of benefits: Greater academic achievement, less delinquency, and better family relations. Yet the research also presents a chicken-and-egg type question: Do children reap those benefits because they have dinner with their families, or do the same families that have dinner together display other traits that account for higher achievement?
More recent research indicates while family dinners can be linked to fewer symptoms of depression, most of the other benefits seem to decrease when demographic and other environmental factors are taken into account. At a time when many families have hectic schedules, dinner at school could provide some relief, said Rachel Dunifon, a policy professor at Cornell University.
“If these meals help alleviate stress, it could actually be good and open up more time for families,” she said.
LAUSD currently serves supper to 75,000 students and plans to expand the program to about 150,000 over the next two years. School officials estimate it will generate $16.6 million in revenue, which will go toward expanding the program.
Other large, urban districts with dinner programs include Philadelphia and District of Columbia public schools. Wayne Grasela, senior vice president for food services, said the School District of Philadelphia now serves 4,500 dinners each day.
At Kingsley Elementary School, several students said the roasted sunflower seeds, cheese sticks and, depending on the day, sandwiches, salads and chicken they are served function more like a snack than a meal. Some eat another meal at home.
But for others, it’s one of the few things they eat after class. Ten-year-old Evelyn Ruballos said she usually only eats crackers when she gets home.
“And then I just go to sleep,” she said.
What exactly are the parents’ food stamps buying then?
Then, you can track down the parents and send them back to Mexico where their welfare check will go a whole lot further.
And there you have the gist of the problem . . . if the kiddies grow up in a functional family, there is always the possibility that they might not vote Democrat.
Yes. Add some washers and driers and call it home. Then end payments to the so called parents.
OK so these parents are on food stamps, WIC etc . Now correct me if I am wrong but they are for the food which we pay for which goes to their kids.
If they are getting all meals free at school then what the hell are they spending the food stamps and WIC etc on?
That idea may have already started with the Central American and Mexican kids who flooded across the border at Obama’s invitation.
The whole school dinner thing is just one more step for the Open Borders lobby. LAUSD doesn’t ask about citizenship and it became overwhelmingly latino in recent years. This is your chance to pay Mexico to send its people to America for free stuff. Órale!
Most likely either selling their EBT cards at a discount or buying premium food you and I can't afford so they can raise some quick cash for booze, smokes and drugs. I've sometimes thought we should open government stores which sell booze, smokes and drugs at bargain prices for EBT card users only.
Who needs parents when Obama rules?/sarc
“OK so these parents are on food stamps, WIC etc . “
That isn’t necessarily true. Some of these parents make plenty of money but they’re real happy to have you pick up their food bill. Who gets booted off the program? No one. The schools push these programs because they are getting money based on the number of students enrolled.
Makes sense. Why aren't their parents feeding them? And why are you putting a gun to my head to make me feed them?
"the basis of economics is scarcity .. prices are the mechanism by which scarce resources are allocated" (I forget who)
When something is free there is going to be no limit on demand. Of course the demand is growing.
‘stensionz, nailz, rimz, grillz...
I, for one, am TAPPED OUT on this paying to feed these poor children over and over and over again. Now 3 meals a day, plus they take food home on weekends, and THEY ARE STILL GETTING ALL THE FOOD STAMPS.
Someone in the GOP needs to make an issue of this, AT LEAST propose an option that the kids either get meals at school OR the parents get the food stamps, but NOT BOTH.
The media is so incompetent in not asking these questions, as well, and just reporting on how it makes better students if the kids are not starving all the time.
Great! Let’s cancel the “fool stamps” for those families.
And at least here in GA all you have to do to get your chil on the program is say you can't afford to feed them - no checking done and no proof required.
Of course if you can't feed your chilluns you probably don't have any business dropping them in the first place, but that's another subject.
I weep for the future.
Exactly, it’s a double whammy for the taxpayer (who no one seems to care about anymore). Plus—what are these parents doing with their time?
I’ll bet a lot of ‘em don’t pay much attention anyway. Or even speak the language.
Next thing you know, they’ll start building dormmatories.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.