Option B for "Barry". Thanks BenLurkin.
|
Posted on 03/28/2015 12:32:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin
NASA has announced that it has selected “Option B” for its Asteroid Redirect Mission (more commonly referred to as ARM), meaning that rather than towing an entire asteroid into lunar orbit, it will instead retrieve a boulder from an asteroid and bring it into a distant retrograde lunar orbit. Using Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP), an uncrewed spacecraft will retrieve a boulder from a yet-to-be-determined asteroid and tow it into lunar orbit, where it will be visited by astronauts on a future Orion / SLS mission.
NASA Associate Administrator Robert Lightfoot said that Option B offers more choices for what object the ARM spacecraft will retrieve.
“The Asteroid Redirect Mission will provide an initial demonstration of several spaceflight capabilities we will need to send astronauts deeper into space, and eventually, to Mars,” Lightfoot said. “The option to retrieve a boulder from an asteroid will have a direct impact on planning for future human missions to deep space and begin a new era of spaceflight.”
(Excerpt) Read more at spaceflightinsider.com ...
So basically get a small asteroid from the surface of a large asteroid.
I am having a problem understanding how this is supposed to work.
And put this new asteroid into orbit round the moon. No, I cant see anything that could go wrong. Lets screw with the moon. Maybe we can have 100 foot tides. Or maybe we can place it wrong, and watch as it whirls off into the earth at mach 1000
Why not pluck boulders from space and toss them at your enemies? You hurl a big enough rock at a city and you have all of the effects of a high yield nuke without all of that messy radiation to deal with...
Won’t be enough mass to screw with the moon or tides. If it entered the earth’s atmosphere it will be a bright fireball and never reach the surface.
This is the equivalent of getting a huge stack of money and setting it on fire.
Check out the scifi novel “Footfall” for that very scenario.
What does Algore suggest?
“Up to four meters in diameter”. More like a meteoroid than an asteroid. It’s less than half the size of the meteor that exploded over Russia in 2013.
But, did they vet this plan with the Muslims first?
Actually it would not be that hard to do with a near earth asteroid. You could actually steer a "planet killer" at the earth. If you "push" the asteroid slightly when it is far out in its orbit it would not take a great deal of energy to put it on a trajectory to impact the earth. A 5 kilometer asteroid would do us all in.
Tungsten darts the size of telephone poles fired from the surface of the moon with rail guns would be formidable weapons. Maybe small rockets attached to make minor course adjustments.
We need to achieve the high ground.
This sure sounds like something Obama dreamed up in one of his adolescent nightmares.
Just yesterday we sent one of the Kelly brothers to space for a year to find out what we already know.
Homer Hickam was complaining about it on twitter yesterday saying we should be looking for ways to overcome the damaging effects of space travel instead of proving what we already know.
I personally think we should be concentrating on living on the moon and using it as the jumping off point for deeper space.
Option B for "Barry". Thanks BenLurkin.
|
Tanstaafl.
Is this Billy Bob's idea?
If you punched the moon with a 10 miler at 30 miles a second the worst we’d face is a bunch of pretty diffuse re-entrant ejecta bombarding us. They’re talking about something the size of a basket ball.
Damn straight!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
