Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/26/2015 3:05:17 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

what’s a Latino lawmakers? Who do they make laws for?


2 posted on 12/26/2015 3:10:36 PM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Thank goodness we have Susan Montoya Bryan to document these glaring, monumental injustices.


3 posted on 12/26/2015 3:10:49 PM PST by sgtyork (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

A new victimized group? Latino ranchers? Really?!!!

When is this nonsense going to end.


4 posted on 12/26/2015 3:31:15 PM PST by Twotone (Truth is hate to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai; All
Thank you for referencing that article Olog-hai. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"The U.S. Department of Agriculture is embarking on a partnership with universities across the country in hopes of infusing its ranks with more diversity as it faces civil rights complaints from Latino farmers and ranchers."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument

The only civil rights that the states have delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to protect are those listed in the Bill of Rights, the 13th and 14th Amendments, and the four voting rights amendments (15th, 19th, 24th and 26th). (Numbered references to constitutional rights clauses that I missed are welcome.)

And since none of the personal protections referenced above reasonably deal with the so-called rights and protections that Latino ranchers and farmers might be looking for, the USDA evidently does not know what it is doing concerning this project imo.

In fact, a previous generation of state sovererignty-respecting justices had not only clarified in general that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate INTRAstate commerce, but the Court also singled out agricultural production as a specific example of such commerce.


6 posted on 12/26/2015 3:54:07 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Racism, plain and simple.


7 posted on 12/26/2015 4:04:48 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If Hillary were held to the same standard as Dinesh D'Souza she'd be in prison for 1,000 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture ... hopes of infusing its ranks with more diversity”

Yeah, boy. There’ll be no increase in crop production but everyone can feel better about themselves. After all, self-esteem and affirmative action are what it’s all about.


10 posted on 12/26/2015 5:24:27 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Disgraceful...not a single transgendered Latino rancher in he entire country.How can it *be* that we’ve been feeding half the world for the last 100 years.


11 posted on 12/26/2015 5:44:23 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The Latinos are smelling Pigford: https://pjmedia.com/zombie/2010/07/27/pigford-v-glickman-86000-claims-from-39697-total-farmers/

Easy pickings from the USDA.


12 posted on 12/26/2015 8:39:56 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson