Posted on 01/18/2016 9:00:01 PM PST by BenLurkin
...spewed carbon dioxide..... rich in calcium, magnesium and phosphorus...Louie Frank keyword:
Show me anything modern that is fossilized. When we blow ourselves up and the next advanced civilization rises there will be a great amount of evidence of a previous civilization.
Say what?!?! What does that even mean?
UCANSEE2: “The existence of tropical forests under the miles of ice sheets might mean that those areas were part of the ‘tropics’ along the equator and Canada/North America might have been the ‘south pole’.”
Remember, the time frame for “snow ball Earth” was hundreds of millions of years BEFORE there were any forests, or other complex life of any kind.
We’re talking about Stromatilites and Algae under all that ice, not forests or critters.
Fungi: “Notice the basis for these time frames is never given, nor can be.
It is based upon a ‘religious faith’, independent of science, one that has so many assumptions it refutes its own premise, boggling the mind to to those who see the false premise. “
Total rubbish, there’s no “Religious faith” in natural-science, only the assumption that natural processes can have scientifically confirmable natural explanations.
In this particular example, it’s also assumed that natural processes operated the same in the deep past as they do today, so radioactive decay rates can tell us ages of various geological formations.
That’s where the estimates of “snow ball Earth” time periods come from.
Are such assumptions valid?
Well, they certainly seem to be, as more & more data from different sciences reconfirms, or falsifies, earlier conclusions.
Nothing “Religious faith” about it.
I’ve seen no evidence for God laughing at anything
My bad.
Now that there are more posts on the thread, I see others have some interesting theories, or arguments against theories. so it is becoming some interesting reading.
Thanks for straightening me out.
;-)
SierraWasp quoting King James, 1 Corinthians 2:14 “But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
That term, here translated, “naural man,” is in other translations more appropriately rendered as, “non-spiritual” or “non-Christian”.
That’s because the term “Natural man” carries a suggestion of natural-science, which was certainly never the apostle Paul’s intention.
It might also suggest someone in a “state of nature” whom we could well expect to be highly spiritual.
So, Paul is talking about non-Christian, non-spiritual people who have no experience of the Holy Spirit, regardless of their other occupations or avocations.
Sure, they could be some of today’s scientists, but also anybody else matching the description.
Ever heard of Lyell and uniformatarianism?
Nope.
additional:
Ancient ‘Snowball Earth’ thawed out in a flash
By Lucas Joel
Apr. 2, 2019 , 10:50 AM
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/ancient-snowball-earth-thawed-out-flash
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.