Posted on 08/13/2017 4:50:40 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
What is going on here? There is this video......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL9tK5jOcDo
But there is also this video taken from a drone, completely different car ramming into people, possibly even running people over...........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4MKwzPYrbk
So why are we hearing of one driver arrested and not two? Who was driving the other car? Is the fake news media once again trying to sell us some BS?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Who is the driver of the red minivan, which is the lead vehicle. The red minivan hit people and they went flying.
The second car appears to rear-end the red minivan. The second vehicle appears to be silvery-white, but that may not be a certain color due to the ambient (daylight) lighting.
Notice the second are has a crunched rear trunk deck. Why?
I thought the fellow from Ohio was driving a dark gray Charger. Are there three (3) vehicles in this pile-up?
Also, notice the individuals in the long white outfits (i.e. Muslim-type garb), they immediately rush from the rear to the passenger side of the red minivan.
What the heck happened.
By the way, where is the rest of the imagery from the drone?
Has any police agency secured the drone imagery?
Was the drone flying legally at the time of the incident?
Who (names please) was the physical operator of the drone?
Lucky some of those protestors brought baseball bats with them.
Uhhhhhh, just one question. Why did they bring baseball bats with them?
—
Remember when liberal hippies brought peace signs? This generation is a violent bunch.
The chopper was following the Governator’s car as he left town to go home.
You guys are used to the movies.
Real life video is never as good as what you expect.
Looks to be more than the media is telling.
Known crooked ‘Rat politician, Gov. Terry McAullife was fleeing the scene of his latest outrage he created in Charlottesville in a government car pursued by the VSP chopper.
See Post #21-
Many questions to resolve....
Three cars involved.
#1, red SUV. #2, silver white car, black roof, with rear end damage, #3, gray car with front end damage.
If gray car driver can show he was legitimately in physical fear for life, he could walk.
Ok. So protesters blocking the street, the van and the second car push through being pelted all the way, van locks up the brakes and gets rear ended. Then the Challenger comes through, gets pelted, the driver gasses it too much and rear ends the cars already piled up. Crowd goes ape and he gets the hell out of there.
Three cars involved.
#1, red SUV. #2, silver white car, black roof, with rear end damage, #3, gray car with front end damage.
If gray car driver can show he was legitimately in physical fear for life, he could walk.
Additionally, person trying to purposely run into protesters would not have purposely rammed another car.
And how could he have been sure he was hitting AntiFa types, and not skinheads?
State does NOT have an automatic case here.
My God, can you imagine the riots if he walked? They would never allow that even if the evidence is overwhelming that he was in fear for his life which I tend to believe is the case considering the violence the Antifa terrorists endorse.
Media has declared him guilty before reviewing the facts .....again !
Theres other footage of the slow moving Challenger from the back being attacked from behind. The Challenger suddenly takes off. With that video it becomes obvious that the driver tried to stomp the break thinking it had hit someone and accidentally stomped the gas.
Antifa regularly blocks and attacks stopped vehicles.
Its too bad more werent run over.
And the chopper crashed. Two cops dead. Looks suspicious.
Gray Charger— https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ewxba5-vdhA
Notice this video has a dark gray Charger with the trunk intact and flashing torn from the front end.
This vehicle is different than the two shown in the NBC video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4MKwzPYrbk
By my count, there are three vehicles involved: lead vehicle red mini van; middle vehicle gray/white sedan with damage on the front and rear (truck deck) and, finally, the gray Charger allegedly the guy from Ohio with a damaged front-end and no damage on the rear trunk deck.
Someone needs to explain why vehicle #1 and #2 are not being paraded in front of the cameras.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3576889/posts?page=25
Were vehicles #1 and #2 operated by the police, a city council member, a member of the media, or just an ordinary slub caught in traffic?
Yep. It’s pretty obvious to me none of this was intentional from the vehicle drivers standpoint.
The van was stopped. Rear-ended by the white car. You can see the front of the white car in the first drone footage. Safe bet the white car was being pelted which made the driver of that car hit the gas. Then along comes the Challenger getting pelted also, it rear ends the white car then leaves the scene. Probably a smart thing he did, they would have killed him.
The testimony of the people driving the first two cars will be interesting. If they are also getting attacked before the accident, the driver of the Challenger will have a chance of walking.
No one goes to a rally trying to stir up trouble driving a minivan.
Hows that tin foil hat fitting?
Its plainly obvious that the Challenger came flying through, hitting the white car, which was then pushed into the minivan.
You can argue about whether the Challenger driver is guilty based on whether he felt threatened, etc., but based on multiple views clear he caused the accident.
“No one goes to a rally trying to stir up trouble driving a minivan.”
Nor a Challenger, if it’s their car. Owners tend to care a lot about those cars.
The white car will tell the tale. Something happened that spooked that driver.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.