Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Greenhouse Gas Effect Is A Scientific Impossibility
principia-scientific.org ^ | May 29, 2018 | Herb Rose

Posted on 05/30/2018 3:12:03 PM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Climate Scientology BUSTED.
1 posted on 05/30/2018 3:12:03 PM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Climate Scientology BUSTED.

LOL, Global Warming nuts do not live in Reality


2 posted on 05/30/2018 3:22:28 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
The mere fact that the Earth is radiating energy into space does not mean that is losing heat or kinetic energy. In order for the Earth to lose heat, we expect it to transfer energy to an object that is cooler.

Absolute gibberish, IMO. The author needs to read up on the concept of thermal radiation and get back to us.

I am an AGO skeptic, but pseudo-intellectual mush like this makes our side look bad.

3 posted on 05/30/2018 3:27:34 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Heat is the kinetic energy of an object

Uh, no, it is not.

4 posted on 05/30/2018 3:32:17 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I believe in global warming, but have said for years this theory is bogus. I believe it is caused my multiple contributors. From population increase, to environmental comfort machines. Totally to complex to print all of it here.


5 posted on 05/30/2018 3:32:48 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Agreed.


6 posted on 05/30/2018 3:34:00 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

How about this?

Science requires use of the scientific method, which entails controlled experiements with reproducible results.

Since controlled climate experiments are impossible, climate “science” does not use the scientific method and is therefore not science.


7 posted on 05/30/2018 3:35:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That works for me. Still doesn’t change that this article is full of non-scientific gibberish.


8 posted on 05/30/2018 3:37:51 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Heat is the kinetic energy of an object

Uh, no, it is not.

I think you're being picky.

Perhaps he should of said thermal energy, but kinetic energy is energy an object possesses when in motion.

Isn't heat exchange considered motion?

9 posted on 05/30/2018 3:40:59 PM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory itself has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of an acceleration of sea level rise how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is far less than the average over the last 18,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.

10 posted on 05/30/2018 3:41:16 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Exactly! Human beings are a fraction of a fraction in terms of our significance on the planet, we couldn’t change the climate if we all tried. Nonsense, non science Marxism in disguise.


11 posted on 05/30/2018 3:42:36 PM PDT by LumberJack53213
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I’m not a scientist, just curious about definitions.


12 posted on 05/30/2018 3:42:57 PM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

For later...


13 posted on 05/30/2018 3:43:46 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I am not being picky. A prime example is a spacecraft entering the Earth’s atmosphere. It has tremendous kinetic energy, but does not generate heat until friction with the atmosphere converts some of the kinetic energy into heat. While in space, the surface of the spacecraft can be extremely cold but still hold tremendous kinetic energy.


14 posted on 05/30/2018 3:43:54 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

It is for this reason that our Thermo instructor forbid us from using the word ‘heat’.

Thermal energy was what we had to use.


15 posted on 05/30/2018 3:45:56 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

From elementary physics I recall that light incident at a transparent boundary layer is ether reflected, refracted or transmitted. For a greenhouse the transmitted light going through glass eventually transforms to heat energy and that heat trapped by the same glass boundary layer. So, where in the atmosphere is the carbon dioxide boundary layer?


16 posted on 05/30/2018 3:47:59 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
"In order for the Earth to lose heat, we expect it to transfer energy to an object that is cooler.

That's true with conduction and convection, but not radiation. Radiation transfers energy, which heat is a form of. It does not need to transfer to something cooler.
17 posted on 05/30/2018 3:48:12 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

The global-warmist literature is full of non-scientific gibberish too.


18 posted on 05/30/2018 4:00:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Well I can tell you one thing for certain.....Herb is in deep dodo! Stay out of Ft. Darcy park.


19 posted on 05/30/2018 4:09:08 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You don’t battle gibberish with more gibberish.


20 posted on 05/30/2018 4:09:27 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson