Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

What they need is gubmint run stores. Sounds kinda commie-like.
1 posted on 04/08/2024 1:25:13 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Libloather

Sue an empty store. There’s a good idea.


2 posted on 04/08/2024 1:28:46 AM PDT by Thistledew (Prepare, for a future without Biden?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

the only solution to a law like that is to pre-close ALL grocery stores in SF prior to the law going into effect ...


3 posted on 04/08/2024 1:29:32 AM PDT by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Simply state you are worried about safety, and only allow one single customer into the store at a time, to be escorted by a private guard/clerk...at the 6 month warning point.


4 posted on 04/08/2024 1:31:52 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Democrat trying to solve a problem they created by creating a new problem.


5 posted on 04/08/2024 1:37:48 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
cannot be left to unilateral backroom decisions by massive corporate entities."

Yet, I'm sure that they never considered the ramifications of such a law upon those same "massive corporate entities" who would be evaluating the opening of a replacement store.

6 posted on 04/08/2024 1:43:24 AM PDT by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

this is truly communist!

the nation was built on free enterprise, not puritanival sovislkism.

oh sure, tell the state wotkforce office, who hasn’t got enough to do now!

i hate to say it, but somebody ought to put this little SPIT out of its nisery!!


7 posted on 04/08/2024 1:54:03 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Grocery stores going Galt?


10 posted on 04/08/2024 2:15:40 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

It is not the government’s decision to make.

Raise up the community in a civilized manner and the stores will return. It is a cultural problem.

The tighter the grip of government the more it strangles the business community. We are watching this happen in many of the blue cities. A feral population runs wild.


11 posted on 04/08/2024 2:28:09 AM PDT by EBH (America Blackmailed, The True Story of the World War...Coming Soon (1/21-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“How dare you not let us rob you, we’ll sue!”


12 posted on 04/08/2024 2:34:26 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

To be safe, maybe stores should just file a notice every six months.

What will the city do, complain if you then don’t close?


13 posted on 04/08/2024 2:39:34 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Flashback: In 1984, city supervisors passed an ordinance requiring supermarkets to do as much, but then-Mayor Dianne Feinstein vetoed the legislation, calling it “an unnecessary intrusion of governmental regulatory authority.”

In her written decision, she added that enabling any supervisor to “act as a bargaining agent” with a grocery store “would only serve as a disincentive for supermarkets” to run their businesses in San Francisco.

Ahead of the city’s decision that year, then-Safeway executive Robert E. Bradford expressed his opposition to the ordinance in a letter, saying its passing “could discourage us from building new replacement stores in the city.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/san-francisco-supervisor-wants-to-regulate-grocery-store-closures/ar-BB1hybaD


14 posted on 04/08/2024 2:39:53 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What they really want is for looters to have plenty of notice so that they can get their looting done.


15 posted on 04/08/2024 2:50:03 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

If this passes, every grocery store in San Francisco should close before the law goes into effect. If the law is written to take effect immediately they should close the day before the vote takes place.

Of course, the next thing that will happen is new stores will be opened with funds from Mexican cartels and with full approval of the same San Franciscan twerps who passed the new law. These new State/Cartel stores won’t have the shrinkage problem of the old stores because people who steal from them will be found floating the bay.


18 posted on 04/08/2024 2:58:09 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

19 posted on 04/08/2024 2:58:28 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"It was a good idea in 1984, and it's an even better idea now," Preston said in a press release.

But your Queen Feinstein vetoed it then anyway.

20 posted on 04/08/2024 3:02:05 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Actually, that's a good idea for San Fran grocers.

National grocery chains should preemptively sell their San Fran stores to a shell company created by them (transfer ownership for pennies and dimes) and then have those shell companies invite the San Fran government to enter into partnerships with them to run these stores in ways that favor the customer (like grocery cooperatives are run).

Then the city will get bogged down with its own grocery problems. San Fran will lose huge amounts of money trying to keep these loser stores alive and suffer the political consequences when customers complain that they are poorly run.

21 posted on 04/08/2024 3:42:23 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

To be called The Directive 10-289 Law of San Francisco.


22 posted on 04/08/2024 3:52:25 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Give them the government surplus food my grandmother lived on when she was widowed in the 50’s, 60’s and was dead broke: cheese, canned goods, peanut butter and lard.


23 posted on 04/08/2024 4:26:13 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Why target grocery stores?

Why not make the law apply to all businesses in San Francisco?

Seriously, they should ask themselves why grocery stores want to close instead of taking them hostage.


24 posted on 04/08/2024 4:34:34 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

***ATTENTION SHOPPERS***

As of ________ our new store hours will be 2:30 am to 2:31 am for the next 6 months.
After 6 months this store will close permanently.
We do not apologize for inconvenience to shoplifters and criminals.

We do feel badly for all of our loyal paying customers.
Your government has let you down.
Lack of policing and enforcement has made it unsafe and unprofitable to operate a store here.
We will not be forced to loose money in order to risk our lives and livelihood.

Please learn to vote differently.

Store Management


25 posted on 04/08/2024 5:01:11 AM PDT by 70times7 (Serving Free Republic's warped and obscure humor needs since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson