Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Liberals Love Gun Control - (Hint:..to disempower the masses?...)
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | JANUARY 11, 2004 | JUSTIN DARR

Posted on 01/11/2005 4:32:09 PM PST by CHARLITE

If there is one thing liberals love more than banning Christianity from public schools it is creating ineffective gun control laws. Despite hard evidence that gun control laws do not lower crime, stop violence, or make society safer in any way, liberals keep plugging away at our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

I am not going to weary you with a regurgitation of all the well known statistics showing how strict gun control laws are followed by sharp spikes in violent crime rates or with arguments asking the Left to explain the intellectual consistency behind their view that the only remedy to a failed gun control law is the creation of another gun control law just like it.

The real question in the gun control debate is not about statistics or the nuances of the law but why in the first place liberals are so preoccupied with making it harder for law-abiding citizens to carry a gun.

Gun control laws are as old as America, stretching far back into the early Colonial period. As far as the United States as a political entity is concerned, the first gun control law came less than one year after the ratification of the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights with the “Uniform Militia Act of 1792.” In the Act, every “able bodied white male citizen” between the ages of 18 and 45 was to be enrolled in the state militia and was required to “provide himself with a musket or firelock, a bayonet, and ammunition.” In early America, it was not a question of “if” you had the right to bear arms, but whether or not you would be “required” to own a gun.

This Act is significant for two reasons. First it shows that the intent of the Framers was that every citizen was considered part of the militia, therefore, no citizen could have their right to bear arms curtailed by the government. Second, with the Act designating “white males” as citizens and part of the militia, it effectively deigned slaves and even free African-Americans their newly declared Constitutional rights.

It is quite obvious that there were many in early America who did not want slaves, or those sympathizing with their suffering, from having access to guns. Why? Well, it is pretty simple. If slaves had guns, then they would not have been slaves for much longer. Slaves would use firearms as a tool to overthrow their oppressors and demand their full rights and dignity as citizens. The “Uniform Militia Act of 1792” opened a door that was used by many states to pass follow up legislation that made it illegal not just for African-Americans to carry or own a gun, but to even use one unless under orders from their “master.” From its inception, gun control was a vehicle to deny basic rights, prevent self-defense, and oppress citizens.

Gun control laws still disproportionately regulate the African-American community, but now our benign liberal leaders want to spread the oppression about a bit more fairly.

But the goal is the same.

Gun control does nothing but oppress a population, deny basic rights, make citizens subservient to the government, and prevents populations from changing their collective conditions at the time of their choosing, rather than at the sanction of the State. Liberals do not want you making your own decisions anymore than they did the slaves. That is their job. How can they possibly restructure society so a Republican is never elected President again if people are running around not doing what they are told? Liberals love gun control for the simple fact that it directly impacts the most independent, self reliant, and freethinking of us as demonstrated by our refusal to proxy our personal protection out to an unaccountable government.

The goal of gun control is not to control guns and make the world a safer place, but to control people. It is not as important for you to pass a criminal background check as much as it is that you feel obligated to ask the state for permission to buy a gun. Liberals know gun control laws will not stop criminals, but they will erode the sense of independence and self-reliance of regular people until they feel that they can do nothing that does not meet government approval.

Gun owners choose to protect themselves, thank you very much. They do not need government protection anymore than they need any of the other ill-conceived plans of the Left. And that is why the liberals want to control their guns. It is the only means they have to directly control the lives of those who would otherwise go on ignoring them.

About the Writer: Justin Darr is a freelance writer living in the Philadelphia area with his wife, Erin, and twin children. He can be read widely on the Internet and in print publications in the United States and Europe. Justin receives e-mail at
justindarr@juno.com


TOPICS: Gardening; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; gunowners; liberalagenda; liberals; nra

1 posted on 01/11/2005 4:32:10 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Militia Act of 1792 - "Balls of the eighteenth part of a pound".

Yep! What caliber is that? 18ga?

2 posted on 03/26/2005 12:49:57 PM PST by TERMINATTOR ("I believe in background checks at gun shows or anywhere" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson