Skip to comments.
Five Reasons Democrats Should Love George W. Bush
opinioneditorials.com ^
| September 16, 2006
| Monte Kuligowski
Posted on 09/16/2006 5:38:48 PM PDT by captnemo1
For the sake of argument, we all can agree that in the context of Iraq, several countries, most notably the U.S., entered into war based on faulty intelligence. But that was only one factor. Regardless of whether Saddam presently had weapons of mass death, we know that the Baghdad butcher was a mass murderer, and we know that Hussein had been in flagrant violation of his terms of surrender, violating international law. The man deserved to be removed from office, did he not? So long as certain members of the U.N. Security Council were on the payroll, however, Hussein thought he was safe.
But he wasnt safe, thanks to the real hero of the Democrat Party, George W. Bush. You see, the Democrats tell us that they hate political corruption. But their should-be-hero saw through the corruption of the U.N. and with a modest international coalition of 49 members, he ousted a murdering rapist and ended financial kickbacks to prominent U.N. members.< p />
So reason number one the Democrats should love Bush is because he stood up to political corruption, both at the U.N. and in Iraq. Due to his strength of character and unfaltering commitment to the Democratic ideal of ending political corruption, he was willing to go it alone.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinioneditorials.com ...
TOPICS: Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: bush; democrats; satire
See more at the site. This guy has a thing or two to say and a great way of saying it!
1
posted on
09/16/2006 5:38:50 PM PDT
by
captnemo1
To: captnemo1
"Five Reasons Democrats Should Love George W. Bush"
Because he stands for freedom of all people? Oh we wouldn't want to think that now would we?
2
posted on
09/16/2006 5:40:43 PM PDT
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: captnemo1
For the sake of argument, we all can agree that in the context of Iraq, several countries, most notably the U.S., entered into war based on faulty intelligence. But that was only one factor. Regardless of whether Saddam presently had weapons of mass death, we know that the Baghdad butcher was a mass murderer, and we know that Hussein had been in flagrant violation of his terms of surrender, violating international law. The man deserved to be removed from office, did he not? So long as certain members of the U.N. Security Council were on the payroll, however, Hussein thought he was safe.
This is sh*t and testimony to the fact that all people (conservative and liberal alike) can fall victim to lies that are repeated often enough. You idiots, I loath you.
Want to know what the war was about? Read the President's State of the Union and speech at the UN given just before the war. Then it becomes clear (pauses for applause and all) what the war with Iraq is for.
3
posted on
09/16/2006 5:51:46 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Jaysun
Hmmm, I think you missed the tags
TOPICS: Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: BUSH; DEMOCRATS
4
posted on
09/17/2006 12:48:31 PM PDT
by
captnemo1
To: captnemo1
Hmmm, I think you missed the tags
TOPICS: Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: BUSH; DEMOCRATS
Clearly. My apologies.
5
posted on
09/19/2006 1:58:05 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson