Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Related Articles:
1 posted on 03/17/2007 3:37:59 AM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Deb; kcvl; Mo1; Enchante; veronica; stocksthatgoup; mewzilla; backhoe; BushisTheMan; Grampa Dave; ..

Ping.


2 posted on 03/17/2007 3:38:56 AM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

3 posted on 03/17/2007 3:44:00 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Thanks for posting. BTTT!


4 posted on 03/17/2007 3:49:35 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
Awesome resource.

Thanks for the research.

Bookmarked.

And BTTT!

5 posted on 03/17/2007 3:50:52 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; ravingnutter; Fedora; Howlin
Adding to the chronology:

JANUARY 2003 late or early FEBRUARY : (WHITE HOUSE SITUATION ROOM - PREPARING THE ROUGH DRAFTS FOR POWELL'S UN SPEECH) Vice President Cheney's office played a major role in the secret debates and pressed for the toughest critique of Saddam's regime, administration officials say. The first draft of Powell's speech was written by Cheney's staff and the National Security Council. Days before the team first gathered at the CIA, a group of officials assembled in the White House Situation Room to hear Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, lay out an indictment of the Iraqi regime--"a Chinese menu" of charges, one participant recalls, that Powell might use in his U.N. speech. Not everyone in the administration was impressed, however. "It was over the top and ran the gamut from al Qaeda to human rights to weapons of mass destruction," says a senior official. [* Who's this? ] "They were unsubstantiated assertions, in my view." Powell, apparently, agreed. So one week before he was to address the U.N. Security Council, he created a team, which set up shop at the CIA, and directed it to provide him with an intelligence report based on more solid information. "Powell was acutely aware of the need to be completely accurate," says the senior official, "and that our national reputation was on the line." ----- "Truth and consequences : New questions about U.S. intelligence regarding Iraq's weapons of mass terror ," By Bruce B. Auster, Mark Mazzetti and Edward T. Pound, USNEWS ^

[* My note: So, did Powell choose Valerie to be on this team he created which set up shop at the CIA? And is this one of the articles derived from the Capitol Hill Blue's bogus source "T J Wilkerson?]

6 posted on 03/17/2007 3:55:19 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
February 6, 2003: Joe Wilson wrote an editorial for the Los Angeles Times, A 'Big Cat' With Nothing to Lose, in which he claimed we should not attack Saddam Hussein because he will use his weapons of mass destruction on our troops and give them to terrorists.

JANUARY 2003 : (WAS WILSON JULY 6, 2003 NY TIMES OP-ED ON NIGER & URANIUM SUPPOSED TO BE RELEASED MUCH EARLIER, IN EARLY JAN 2003 OR IS THIS JUST A SLIP OF THE TONGUE BY RAY MCGOVERN? --see VIPS)
RAY MCGOVERN : "Now why did the White House do that? Well, the conventional wisdom is they really hated Joe Wilson. Why did they hate Joe Wilson? Well, because in reporting in The New York Times in his famous op-ed in early January of 2003, he reported that there was no legitimate report about Iraq seeking uranium in Niger for lots of reasons" -------- The BRAD SHOW On the Air! TRANSCRIPT: Ray McGovern Interview 6/11/05, http://bradblog.com/BradShow/Transcripts/RayMcGovern_061105.htm

8 posted on 03/17/2007 4:11:42 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

bookmark


11 posted on 03/17/2007 4:24:46 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Another bookmark. Thanks.


14 posted on 03/17/2007 4:43:48 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Bump


16 posted on 03/17/2007 4:45:25 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

" May 2, 2003: Joe Wilson and Valerie attended a conference sponsored by the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, at which Wilson spoke about Iraq. "

Democrats, start calling these witnesses.


17 posted on 03/17/2007 4:49:57 AM PDT by Son House ( The Presidents enemies, are my enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Interesting read here and at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame


27 posted on 03/17/2007 5:49:58 AM PDT by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

The left keeps on saying that Bush and co. outed Plame in retaliation against Wilson. Bush and co. should serve justice and history and now really go after Wilson and Plame for their duplicity and outright lying to anybody and everybody and for the money spent on Fitz's show trial. Free Libby and put these two in prison!


32 posted on 03/17/2007 6:59:36 AM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Bookmarked. This fraud needs to be exposed yesterday...


33 posted on 03/17/2007 7:05:28 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("We're Living In A Twilight World..."- Swingout Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

BUMP!


35 posted on 03/17/2007 7:55:06 AM PDT by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aflaak

ping


37 posted on 03/17/2007 9:37:19 AM PDT by r-q-tek86 (Snakes can't be taught to walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

I don't understand any of this. Thought Valerie Plame had been outed years ago and was no longer a covert operative at the time of this supposed outing. She made a statement the other day to someone questioning her that the Bush's administration outing of her ended her career and endangered other operatives in the field. When asked if she was Republican or Democrat, she smiled sweetly and said "why yes I'm a democrat." Has all this wasted time, energy and money been just another exercise by the Democrats to discredit the republicans? Somebody please explain this to me.


39 posted on 03/17/2007 11:34:06 AM PDT by tob2 ( "I may not be perfect but I'm always me." Anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; All

MUST READ!!!


43 posted on 03/17/2007 1:15:29 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; All

MUST READ!!!


44 posted on 03/17/2007 1:22:24 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

bttt


57 posted on 03/17/2007 3:25:51 PM PDT by southland (Matt: 7-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Jen's Mom

Pings for Kaslin and Jen's Mom


66 posted on 03/17/2007 4:47:04 PM PDT by Tut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson