Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
I save it for particularly appropriate occasions .. ;)
When you have time for a long and detailed Obama
family background, check this out if you haven’t.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/what_barack_obama_learned_from.html
That is a good blog post on Obama. I’ve read it several times.
I can’t wait until that blogger updates it with the Lou Posner brothel bust since the monies were being funnelled through voter activist groups affiliated with ACORN.
Great morning coffee reading. Thanks, Star. ;) (I can’t believe this thread is over 3000 posts!)
Shades of Dan Rather, but the spacing looks to modern on that blown up portion.
Lori // July 22, 2008 at 9:36 pmNo, not really, Lori. Why the modified limited hangout with the CoLB? Why hasn't Obama had the Dept of Vital Stats release the supporting documentation?Hi, I’ve talked to the Department of Vital Records and the Honolulu Advertiser.In 1961, the hospitals would take their new birth certificates to Vital Records. At the end of the week, Vital Records would post a sheet that for the news paper to pick up that contained births, deaths, marriages and divorces. The Advertiser routinely printed this information in their Sunday edition. This is not a paid announcement that his grandmother could arrange. This is information that comes from Vital Records - we know this because this particular section reflects those records. They didn’t have a provision for paid, one sentence announcement that would be included in the Vital Records. At the time, if a child was born outside a hospital, the family would have 30 days to apply for a birth certificate and Vital Records would expect to see prenatal care records, or pediatrician records of the first check up, etc. They’d also want the notarized statement from the mid-wife. Of course, they can apply later but that would noted as a different kind of birth certificate. I think TD has already addressed that. This information was received by Vital Records the first week of his birth = that suggests the hospital.
Next, the announcement is from Sunday, August 13th and Obama was born on Friday, August 4th. Hospitals usually don’t take birth certificate information the first couple days to avoid changes. So it was likely filled out on the 4th or so, as hospital stays were usually 3 - 5 days at the time. Lastly, having worked in a newborn nursery in college, hospitals don’t ask for documentation. If mom says she’s married, that’s what they write. They have no authority to question her statement.
In Honolulu at the time, paid birth announcements weren’t in vogue. Frequently families would post one year announcements that included pictures from the party, etc. I haven’t checked to see if that exists.
I hope that finishes clearing this up.
I opened up a new thread to discuss this finding.
Obama’s Birth Announcement found in Newspaper
Texas Darlin Website ^ | July 22, 2008 | Texas Darlin
Posted on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:05:44 PM by Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2049721/
That’s how searches work .. they bring up all
terms if there’s not one exactly like your
search term.
No thread.
The thread is filed with the birth certificate.
Obama’s Birth Announcement found in Newspaper
Texas Darlin Website ^ | July 22, 2008 | Texas Darlin
Posted on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:05:44 PM by Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2049721/posts
I opened a new browser window and got straight to that thread. Maybe the thread’s being pulled. I copied straight from the URL window...
The reference to phone numbers lost me on that one. Besides Google is 2008. We are talking 1961. Street numbering may have changed.
I know that. My point is there appears not to be any 6085 Address but there are lots of phone numbers with the last 4 digits of 6085.
In that Google page I found the address 6700 so when I Googled it, it brought up that address. Confirming there appears NOT to be any 6085 address.
Wouldn’t we love to know (not condoning what
they did) what the passport revealed.
~~~~~
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/21/obama.passport/index.html
“# The Analysis Corporation is one of the companies involved, officials say
# Stanley Inc. is other company that employed contractors, officials say
Sen. Barack Obama called for an investigation Friday into how the security of the passport files of the three remaining presidential candidates was breached.
The State Department admitted Friday that the passport files of Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John McCain had been accessed without authorization.
“One of the things that the American people count on in their interactions with any level of government is that if they have to disclose personal information, that it stay personal and stay private,” Obama said in Portland, Oregon.
“And when you have not just one but a series of attempts to tap into people’s personal records, that’s a problem not just for me but for how our government is functioning,” he said.
Obama said he expected “a full and thorough investigation” by the administration in conjunction with congressional oversight committees.”
~~~~
And I had forgotten about another part of this web ... (jeesh, there are too many dang tangled webs with this bunch)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/23/passport-contractor-execs-obama-clinton-supporters/
Passport contractors connected to Presidential campaigns.
WASHINGTON (CNN) – The CEO of a company whose employee is accused of improperly accessing the passport files of presidential candidates is a consultant to the Obama campaign, a source familiar with the firm said Saturday.
John Brennan, president of The Analysis Corporation (TAC), advises the Illinois Democrat on foreign policy and intelligence issues, the source said.
Brennan briefed the media on behalf of the campaign earlier this month. The executive is a former senior CIA official and former interim director of the National Counterterrorism Center. He contributed $2,300 to the Obama campaign in January.
In that Google list I saw 6700 Kalanianaole Hwy so I Googled it and sure enough it came up as a street address.
I don't think street address would have changed on that major Hwy. So it appears there is no 6085.
Fonts and spacing do seem off. No one seems too worried about it though.
I would love to know who found this and how. I know of a few that looked and said it wasn’t there.
::shrugs::
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.