Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats do not take Islamofascism threat seriously
http://publiusetiam.blogspot.com/2008/06/democrats-do-not-take-islamofascism.html ^ | June 18, 2008

Posted on 07/20/2008 5:52:24 AM PDT by Righting

Democrats do not take Islamofascism threat seriously

Democrats do not take the threat to our civilization by Islamo-fascists seriously. They think defending our country against them is a job for cops, not the military. They want to try terrorists in our civilian courts as if they were petty criminals. And now, a senior advisor to Obama says the following:

In arguing that the country should back off a policy that causes too much pain, Danzig said, “”Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”

He read a section from the children’s book where Pooh Bear hurts himself going down the steps because he hasn’t stopped to think of another way.

During his address to the Center for New American Security, Danzig also said much can be learned about the motivations of terrorists by looking at, for instance, soccer fans who become absorbed by violence or even the Star Wars movies."

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/18/obama-adviser-pooh-bear-luke-skywalker-hold-lessons-for-foreign-policy/


No, Danzig, these people are violent fascists who would kill every man, woman, and child in America if it would further their goal of domination of the world by Islam. The fact that you don't take this threat seriously, the fact that you are talking about this in terms of a children's book and sci-fi movie, indicates that you really, truly don't get it. Democrats just don't get it.



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: dems; elections; foreignpolicy; globaljihad; islamofascism; libs; mccain; mohammedanism; obama; wot

1 posted on 07/20/2008 5:52:24 AM PDT by Righting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Righting


2 posted on 07/20/2008 5:57:55 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

With all the attacks and silly little ‘name calling’ upon ‘the New Yorker’, the justice-damage on Obama is DONE!


3 posted on 07/20/2008 6:09:01 AM PDT by Righting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Righting

Until they start competing for the last chair, why would one fascist have a problem with another fascist?


4 posted on 07/20/2008 6:11:26 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righting

A lot of the hard left doesn’t even think there is a terrorist problem, and are into these 9/11 conspiracy theories that don’t have a shred of real evidence (although they would say they do; things like “the buildings fell wrong” or something). Then there are those who want to “understand” the terrorists, and find a way to accomidate them. Understand them, that is, as something that they’re not, or as “freedom fighters”. You can’t convince these types of anything because their logic is so twisted. they’ll say things like “they’re just fighting the only way they can”, or “they’re just a product of their environment”. The latter may be true but they’re still cold-blooded killers. There are also those who just hate Bush, Israel, or whatever so much that the terrorists, who are out of sight and mind (so far), don’t matter. In any case, that’s probably 75% of Democrats and they’re mentally unfit to fight the war on terror.


5 posted on 07/20/2008 6:16:21 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righting

Understandably they admire fascism....fascism is liberalism with ‘nads!!


6 posted on 07/20/2008 6:22:30 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righting

There are some liberals who seem to think that the US deserves what it gets and who revel in terrorist attacks and US humiliation. For example, at Columbia University where a professor said he was hoping for “a thousand Mogadishus.” Or Code Pink people who were sending relief supplies to “insurgents” in Iraq who were killing our soldiers. Or the NY Times which takes gleeful pleasure in broadcasting national security info - in some cases, disrupting MI5 and/or FBI operations before they can finish the job.

These people want to disarm the US, so naturally they will do what they can to downgrade the Islamist threat.


7 posted on 07/20/2008 7:25:09 AM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righting
For years a few have spoken of the most important war because the outcome of that war will dictate the chances America has defending against foreign enemies.

There is a civil war -- perhaps better described as a second revolution against the tyranny of "royalty." Let's get it over with.

We do not want to try this on our own. It will require the leadership of our military and law enforcement, suspension of some rights and likely internment of many for the duration, and disruption of day-to-day activities here and there. That is, if the enemies within want to fight.

This ain't Pooh Bears playing soccer.

IMO it's not a rank-and-file Democrat v. Republican -- or even a liberal v. conservative -- conflict. It's a struggle between Americans and those who have arrogantly moved beyond being Americans.

The "anointed ones" (as Dr. Sowell has named them, I believe) among the MSM, political parties, government, universities, activist courts, internationalists, eco-freaks, et al all dictating ways to fix this "awful" place called America.

8 posted on 07/20/2008 7:50:24 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear
RE: "There are some liberals who seem to think that the US deserves what it gets and who revel in terrorist attacks and US humiliation."

Excellent points. The "anointed ones" or the new royalty just want a humiliation not a total defeat; and I have to say that they have the right to believe it and work for it. The rest of us of course have the right to oppose them.

America is a kind of unalienable rights supercollider. There will start to be head-on collisions the more "particles" are added. The royalty are adding particles every day.

BTW, I've met liberals who are not of the Rat Party they are what the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party used to be.

9 posted on 07/20/2008 8:49:36 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Righting

The red diaper doper baby Obama supporters think that we can all just have a latte at starbucks with the terrorists and explain to them the error in their ways, next they light up a doobie and some candles while singing the theme song to woodstock and all will be peace and light


10 posted on 07/20/2008 3:43:08 PM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righting

The Dems are like the the clueless appeasers in the UK to the 3rd Reich in the late 30s.


11 posted on 07/20/2008 3:45:41 PM PDT by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson