Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polarik's final report: Obama's 'Born' Conspiracy Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud
The Greater Evil ^ | 11/22/08 | Polarik

Posted on 11/22/2008 9:08:58 PM PST by Polarik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 481-500 next last
To: Polarik; et al
I have a correction to make to the image table that also changes my discussion of it: the compression level of the Daily Kos image should read, "3.3%," and not "33%," as originally reported -- meaning that the Daily Kos image was the most compressed image of the four image copies made.

As a result, I have rewritten the three paragraphs of narrative that originally followed the table, and are presented below. Please refer to these in your review of the report. Thanks!


The image with the highest compression ratio, where lower is better, and the second highest color count, where higher is better, was the original Daily Kos image, with a 3% compression ratio, and a 70,604 color count. Next in line was the Factcheck image with a 6% compression ratio and a 77,903 color count. Although the Fight The Smears image, and Politifact image had lower compression ratios than the images posted on the Daily Kos and Factcheck, they were also the smallest in terms of file size and image size, and had less than half of the colors displayed in the two largest images.

As for which of these characteristics are most important, a larger image size and a higher color count can compensate for higher levels of image compression. Although the Factcheck image was larger in size than the Daily Kos image, when it is cropped to the same dimensions of the Daily Kos image (2427 x 2369 from 2550 x 3300), and saved at a JPG quality level of 46%, the resulting Factcheck image will now have the same file size and use the same amount of computer memory as the Daily Kos image. However, its new color count will virtually be the same as the original, full-size image (from 77,903 to 77,478).

Normally, when a JPG image is saved with a quality level, or compression level, less than 40%, the image that results will not appear to be clear and sharp unless it is viewed at its original size. However, if you only get to view an image that was reduced to be a fraction of its original size, let's say, at the size of the COLB images displayed on Obama's Fight The Smears website, it will seem to look "just fine" when small, but look horrible when you try to enlarge it.

One of the other main differences between the FTS image and the Daily Kos image is its resolution: the FTS image is 100 DPI versus 300 DPI for the Daily Kos image. When you enlarge the FTS image to be the same size as the Daily Kos image, you will see a lot of visual gibberish, which as I said, is exactly what FTS wanted you to see.

Not only was their original image intentionally shrunk down to the size of an image "thumbnail," it was not resized proportionately; i.e., if you change its height to be the same size as the Daily Kos image, its width would be seventeen (17) pixels narrower than it should be. In other words, its aspect ratio was changed, calculated as height divided by width.

201 posted on 11/24/2008 12:18:19 PM PST by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Have you seen this article by Dr. Polarik?

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


202 posted on 11/24/2008 12:47:51 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Are you referring to this article by Dr. Polarik?


203 posted on 11/24/2008 12:54:31 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

WITHIN EACH IMAGE, COMPARE THE "S" IN "LASER" TO "S" IN "OHSM"

KOS OHSM:

FTS OHSM:



SO...CAN I HEAR AN "AMEN," BROTHER?


204 posted on 11/24/2008 1:00:54 PM PST by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Polarik; LucyT; FARS; MeekOneGOP; ntnychik; dixiechick; Fred Nerks; Calpernia; potlatch; ..

The Leader is not legitimate--behold a nation of The Leader, not of law.

205 posted on 11/24/2008 1:55:08 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

whats ths significance?


206 posted on 11/24/2008 2:12:41 PM PST by remaxagnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
"They would probably riot! Doesn’t matter though, this is the right thing to do."
That is the stuff I had in mind. The big cities may find a real explosion of hate crimes directed at anyone not considered a minority. So many of these people who voted for him are not the brightest bulbs around, and voted only because they want to see a black POTUS. Nothing else matters to them.
At any rate, do not feel obligated to respond. Many of us see the various problems that could arise from this. And this thread takes so long to load before one can even respond to a ping or comment it is a bit to much to be wading through at this point. I run out of available memory just waiting for the whole web page to download.
207 posted on 11/24/2008 2:56:55 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
But the form shown in your presentation isn't the form required when he applied for a US Passport. It was necessary to obtain a more detailed long form....and we have that on hand as well.

Do you have a link to somewhere where that is documented. Not that I'm doubting it, but as Reagan said, "Trust, but verify".

It certainly would lend credibility to the argument that "not good enough for a passport", is certainly not good enough to verify eligibility to be President.

208 posted on 11/24/2008 4:16:56 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Wow this is amazing work. I hope someone is using it well.
This imposter must be stopped and I pray your hard work convinces the powers that be that we have a serious problem with this candidate!!!
Thank you and God bless!!


209 posted on 11/24/2008 4:29:44 PM PST by jackv (Just shakin' my head!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
i>He has proven that the seal on the FAKE birth certificate is not the seal they used in 1961.

The Seal should have been a 2007 seal, to go with the 2007 registrars date stamp. The year of birth is irrelevant, this things are produced on demand, and the stamp should be the one in use the year there are produced. The "long form" birth certificate, if a copy were provided tomorrow, would have a 2008 stamp, certifying that the copy made in 2008 was a true copy.

210 posted on 11/24/2008 5:09:34 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Can this report be used in the current lawsuits? Would that be legal and admissible?


211 posted on 11/24/2008 5:31:46 PM PST by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
I find it hard to see how this closeup of the seal (frontside of BC) has been photoshopped in. Note the paper distortion at the fold around the seal. Looks real to me:
212 posted on 11/24/2008 5:59:32 PM PST by Ken Woods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

“The Seal should have been a 2007 seal, to go with the 2007 registrars date stamp.”

Who said they use a new mechanical seal every year? The seal has no date on it. It could have been in use since 1960 for all we know. Just because one 2008 BC has the same stamp pattern as the 2007 BO stamp does not prove the stamp was made in 2008 or the stamp wasn’t used in 2007 or earlier years. The HI health dept probably has dozens of embossed stamps they use, manufactured by different companies over the years, with slightly different features.

The rubber stamped name is not part of of the metal stamp. They are all applied by hand and may end up anywhere the employee decides to stamp them.


213 posted on 11/24/2008 5:59:38 PM PST by Ken Woods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

“The Seal should have been a 2007 seal, to go with the 2007 registrars date stamp. The year of birth is irrelevant, this things are produced on demand, and the stamp should be the one in use the year there are produced.”

Why should a different seal be used each year? Where is the evidence for that? The mechanical metal seal used for a 2008 BC could have been made in 1960 for all we know. The HI Health Dept has many embossing seals they use. None of them have the date on them, so they can be used for any year. They will differ slightly in seal design depending on what company made them over the years. You can’t claim there is a “new” 2008 seal ONLY used on 2008 BC, based on a single 2008 BC. But at least Polarik confirms that the seal on Obama’s BC is the same as one used by the Hawaiian Health Dept.


214 posted on 11/24/2008 5:59:39 PM PST by Ken Woods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
I am finding it hard to see how this closeup of the fold in Obama's BC at the seal could be photoshopped in as you claim. Note the paper and seal interaction at the fold. And the paper fibers conforming to the seal. How could that be faked. Here's the close up of the front BC seal/fold:
215 posted on 11/24/2008 5:59:41 PM PST by Ken Woods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Ken Woods; All

http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/deputy-white-house-press-secretary.html

In a press briefing this morning, Deputy White House Press Secretary Tony Fratto ended the briefing by overtly avoiding a question regarding President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate and demands made by the CEO of WorldNetDaily that a long-form document be released.


216 posted on 11/24/2008 7:06:31 PM PST by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
Excellent work, Polarik! Very impressive & your painstaking efforts to expose 0bama & find the Truth are most appreciated by the FReeper! I thank you.

Re: 0bama's father's race designation: "AFRICAN" vs. "NEGRO" (which was most likely the "un-politically- correct" term used in 1961) This certainly stands out like a "sore thumb." I'm not sure that you have addressed this issue on your blog. IMO, it would be very beneficial to your (our) case if you could locate another African-American's (or 3) Hawaiian BC from 1961 (the same year, of course, BHO was born) and see what the "Race" designation was. Or.....perhaps you're way ahead of me and have already done so!?!?

My two cents...Thanks again!

Beloved Levinite

217 posted on 11/24/2008 7:13:19 PM PST by Beloved Levinite (OBAMA-BYE-DONE-2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
For the hell of it....errrr HECK of it, I looked up Rev. 11/01 ;)

11:1 And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

**For amusement purposes only. No flaming please.

218 posted on 11/24/2008 7:48:33 PM PST by Beloved Levinite (OBAMA-BYE-DONE-2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
Polarik's final report: Obama's 'Born' Conspiracy Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud

November 24, 2008, 11:14PM EST · 217 replies · 12,020+ views

219 posted on 11/24/2008 8:15:58 PM PST by LucyT (.......................Don't go wobbly now.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 1035rep; 1curiousmind; 2ndDivisionVet; ..

Carter, in some or many ways, role model for Obama

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2008/11/terrorist-president-of-america-jimmuh.html


220 posted on 11/24/2008 8:29:44 PM PST by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 481-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson