Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Losing Mr. Gingrich (Newt's open Letter to the RNC)
The American Sentinel ^ | 12/17/2008 | NEPAConservative

Posted on 12/17/2008 7:49:05 PM PST by NEPAConservative

These days I’ve been scratching my head wondering what in the world is going on with a man I used to admire. I’m talking about Newt Gingrich. Newt’s new style of softball politically correct politics has really got me wondering, When did Newt decide to sell his soul ?

more here


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt; newtgingrich; obama; openletter; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: ckilmer; Glacier Honey; The Mayor; trooprally; Jim Robinson; LucyT; Sir Francis Dashwood; ...

People who to some degree are bored by/distrust/loathe the MSM - supermajority.
People who disdain Congress (approval ratings) - supermajority.
People who think public education stinks - supermajority.
People who think crime is not being properly addressed - supermajority.
People who want genuine change - supermajority.


People who can help get the message out about who’s to blame - 57 million 2008 Palin voters (yes, I said PALIN voters) plus maybe tens of millions who didn’t vote because of the other individual on the GOP ticket.

To paraphrase a great General, “The poor Liberal rascals, they’ve got us surrounded!”


81 posted on 12/17/2008 10:08:04 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mrclean5

“Oh yeah, it’s so terrible that Newt wants to work with Democrats and help solve problems. Let’s castrate him!”

Terrible?! Uh Yeah it is when it means compromising his past true conservative values. Perhaps you weren’t paying attention in the 1994 when Newt authored the Conservative Contract wtih America and was one of the strongest opponents of Nationalized Health Care—yeah it is pretty big that he has totally changed his tone. Even from this summer with his “Drill Here Drill Now Campaign,” he was all about standing up for conservative principles—so now that the Drill Here Drill Now issue has waned, Newt wants to compromise and shame RNC for having a backbone—uh yeah it is terrible.

Why is it that working with Democrats ALWAYS means compromising conservative values—never compromising liberal values?!

Oh & welcome to Free Republic??


82 posted on 12/17/2008 10:42:41 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: floridagopvoter

“I think the pendulum will swing back, as it always does, but as screwed up as things are today it may take a bit longer than we think/hope.”

I agree. But conservatives will benefit from that only if we do not participate in the even bigger problems coming. No bipartisan cover. We need to be the respectful opposition. But we need to be voting no. Not compromising and voting yes to make terrible litigation a little less terrible. The only thing compromise will achieve is that we will be blamed for the problems that are coming.

If you think things are bad now, wait ‘til after cap and trade hits and the EPA starts taxing cow farts.


83 posted on 12/17/2008 11:40:41 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NEPAConservative

Newt has been going soft. Newt was the one who pratically told us to get over President Reagan’s style of Conservatism. Newt said that particular Conservatism is dead and gone. In other words, don’t expect him to fight for something he no longer believes in...


84 posted on 12/18/2008 2:30:26 AM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I’m not following you here, C.
“afrocentric” by which you mean, in this context,...what?


85 posted on 12/18/2008 5:36:54 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Bunkasaurus

I’m not following you here, C.
“afrocentric” by which you mean, in this context,...what?

//////////////
obama’s last church was afrocentric.


86 posted on 12/18/2008 5:58:02 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Probably because O’s campaign did not emphasize such. Indeed, ran away from, disassociated.
Rev Wright, otoh, would not win an election.

A GOP candidate embracing the fundamentalist brand of Christianity would not win an election...not a national one, anyway. Scares the suburbanites.


87 posted on 12/18/2008 6:08:09 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Bunkasaurus

There are immense mega churches in the suburbs around major cities outside the north east these days. They are not liberal.


88 posted on 12/18/2008 6:17:18 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

‘kay.


89 posted on 12/18/2008 6:25:05 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Yes I remember the incident when a couple from Florida listened in on one of his cell calls to his lawyer. Newt wasn’t suppose to be discussing the fact that he received money from speeches I believe and this was being investigated. Anyway, he wasn’t suppose to be discussing the issue even with his lawyer and this couple heard and recorded him discussing the case, of which he had to return the money and face fines and just all kinds of hoops to jump thru. Meanwhile, democrats can be murdering, raping and stealing and all goes unpurnished. Newt was beaten back from that and has really never showed any real back bone after that incident. The couple who illigally recorded his call I believe was fined but who is say they really were fined. I lost hope for him ever being a candidate of any kind of real weight.


90 posted on 12/18/2008 6:36:22 AM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NEPAConservative

Time to reestablish the lines and bring real republicans back into offices who represent what we want.


91 posted on 12/18/2008 7:22:36 AM PST by Munz (Infiltrate Interrogate Eradicate NEXT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrclean5
Principles change every generation. I want my 401K to go back up, I want my bonuses back, and if Republicans and/or Democrats can make it happen, great.

In case you haven't noticed, this site is dedicated to and it's purpose is to further conservative principles, such as: Limited Government, conservative moral principles, a strong military, and law and order (No Amnesty being an example).

While I sympathize with your economic difficulties, they do not rise to the level of throwing tried and true conservative principles that work in a much more effective manner in fiscal matters ( as well as in all other matters) to compromise those principles to accept forms of socialism(which is all the Democrats have) that have been proven over and over again to not work.
92 posted on 12/18/2008 7:50:02 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bunkasaurus; buccaneer81
Get it through your head: White Evangelical Protestant males = less than 50% of the votes.

Now and in the future...except in the future it will be worse.
You're approach just gave us the worst whipping we have had in several generations.

Furthermore, this is a conservative site, dedicated to fighting for ONLY conservative positions on the issues.

You maybe lost and you maybe happier on a moderate "Big-Tent", "Compassionate-Conservative" GOP site.

This site ain't it!
93 posted on 12/18/2008 7:54:10 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
The argument on this thread is around Newt's conservative soul and if it still exists. But the argument needs to surround why he wrote the letter to Mike Duncan and the timing of the letter. The timing and purpose of the letter tells me Newt Gingrich is obviously trying to get himself a seat at the RNC table when bringing in the new chairman (he's already thrown his support behind Michael Steele). And Newt's message of "positive solutions" is not unwelcome. However, Newt Gingrich sending a letter to Mike Duncan about anything other than thanking him for his past service is completely inappropriate. Newt is powerful enough to make his feelings about the ad known to Duncan and others without releasing a public letter. He's got these guys in his cell phone! By further condemning your own party in public, Newt shows the same knack for anti-GOP rhetoric as John McCain. Their criticism serves to do nothing more but provide red meat to a media whose only desire is to strip America of any conservative viewpoint. It's time to get our internal fights behind closed doors and put our fights with Democrats in public. We're only given a modicum of media attention. Newt and others need to use this wisely.
94 posted on 12/18/2008 7:56:07 AM PST by AmericanGirlRising (The cow is in the ditch. We know how it got there. Now help me get it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

“Let’s pray for people instead of curse them.

We need to exhort, not kick, people who fall short of our ideals.”

Fine. Which Newt do we pray for? The ‘conservative’ one that a few are still convinced he is....or the real RINO Newt who supported amnesty with the other open border hacks?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2144086/posts?page=34#34


95 posted on 12/18/2008 8:33:05 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So,
Thanks for the advice.


96 posted on 12/18/2008 9:29:27 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Doesn’t matter if you or I or Newt or the Queen of England thinks he screwed up.
Unless the majority of the American electorate thinks he did, he will win re-election.
Perhaps along with his VP running mate, Senator Kennedy (D-NY)


97 posted on 12/18/2008 10:07:30 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
I never understand why this crowd hates Newt. He’s the only conservative since Reagan who has delivered for Republicans.

He was my Representative. I think I can answer that. I drove past his Cobb County office every day to and from work. I attended rallies for Newt in the Wheeler High School Auditorium and in the parking lot of Williamson Bros. Bar-B-Q only a thousand yards from The Big Chicken.

His problem with me is trust. I helped resoundingly reelect him and the next day he announced he was leaving the House. Not just resigning his Speakership, resigning his House seat. He didn't have sense enough to know that he had an obligation to serve after a very successful campaign.

He has long had a problem standing up to the opposition. When attacked on the budget for being petty, he gave in instead of standing firm against the Democrats. He even gave up his limousine to accusations by the Democrats that it went against his stated goals of Congressional reform; although the fact is that Newt used it as a traveling office and got more work done in his limousine than ten other politicians together.

Rather than ignoring attacks and standing against the Democrats and the MSM, he will continue to try to usurp their positions with the effect that Republicans are constantly pushed to the left. Rather than trying to implement "green conservatism", Newt should be shouting from the mountains that the Environmental issue is a globally manufactured Socialist tool for the destruction of Free market Capitalism. Rather than trying to solve the "health-care issue", he should expose it as a manufactured Democrat Socialist issue that must have no federal involvement. Rather than attempting to "transform government" he should stop the Socialist transformation that has occurred for the past one hundred years. Rather than imploring the Republican party to give HWMNBN a chance to succeed, Newt should be drawing a line in the sand to obstruct all of the Socialist policies that will be enacted by a Democrat hegemony.

98 posted on 12/18/2008 7:29:06 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: NEPAConservative

“Why did he avoid running this time around ?”

I think he correctly predicted it was a losing year for the GOP, what with the messes Bush left. Unpopular, unfinished wars, lousy economy, etc.

IMO


99 posted on 12/27/2008 4:02:55 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson