Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finally, rep speaks up..“Whole Truth will Eventually be Public” on Presidential Eligibility
The Right Side... ^ | 2/9/09 | Phil

Posted on 02/09/2009 11:04:31 AM PST by Sorry screen name in use

You are right to be concerned with anything as important as the Constitutional requirements for holding the highest elected office in this country. Failing to be concerned would send a message that the law just doesn’t matter if you’re in a high enough office. I believe the system will work and the whole truth will eventually be public. In the meantime, I truly do appreciate your input and also having the opportunity to be your servant in the United States House of Representatives

(Excerpt) Read more at therightsideoflife.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: barackobama; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; constitution; democrats; democratscandals; eligibility; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orly; orlytaitz; potus; scotus; taitz; truthers; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2009 11:04:31 AM PST by Sorry screen name in use
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Good!


2 posted on 02/09/2009 11:05:17 AM PST by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use
I believe the system will work and the whole truth will eventually be public.

Right. In 4 to 8 years.

3 posted on 02/09/2009 11:06:52 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

I am having my doubts that the courts will hold our Kenyan-in-Chief accountable for the truth of his history.


4 posted on 02/09/2009 11:06:56 AM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

He’s “watching” the cases go through the court, which implies his point of view is passive, since we’re all “watching” the cases cycle through the courts I’m not sure his letter is at all meaningful.


5 posted on 02/09/2009 11:07:11 AM PST by Troll_House_Cookies (Ironically, Chancellor Obama's first re-education camp will be in Alaska.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

You can contact Louie here:
http://gohmert.house.gov/contact_louie.htm
to let him know that we all care.


6 posted on 02/09/2009 11:08:13 AM PST by Sorry screen name in use
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Troll_House_Cookies

Exactly. Under the Constitution, there are 3 co-equal branches of the Federal Government. How can someone not born in this country - and therefore illegally holding the office of the President - be “co-equal” with any of the legislators?


7 posted on 02/09/2009 11:12:40 AM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

It is pointless at this point anyway. If the Birth Certificate does surface, the question will be, why didn’t he show it before the election when asked? He’s had time to create an undebunkalbe forgery, etc etc etc.... Nothing can legitimize him now.


8 posted on 02/09/2009 11:14:07 AM PST by bird4four4 (God Damn America!!! - Mr. Wright, your prayer has been answered 11-4-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Remove the Kenyan Keynesian! (I think impeachment only applies to the duly elected.)


9 posted on 02/09/2009 11:15:27 AM PST by Trod Upon (The Left killed my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Sound like your basic glad-handing response.


10 posted on 02/09/2009 11:50:07 AM PST by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use
Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic
11 posted on 02/09/2009 11:58:28 AM PST by MtnMan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use
I wouldn't get too excited if I were you.

He's just throwing a bone to some birther constituants who have been bothering him with their conspiracy theories, hoping it will make them shut up and stop calling his office.

Like you, however, he will be dissapointed.

12 posted on 02/09/2009 1:03:14 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Not buying it. The republocant party is run by a bunch of pansies. They will not do anything to really stop commie obammie, he is after all, one of them.


13 posted on 02/09/2009 1:20:14 PM PST by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
He's just throwing a bone to some birther constituants who have been bothering him with their conspiracy theories, hoping it will make them shut up and stop calling his office.

LOL! You know a few of these people got a lot of time on their hands!

14 posted on 02/09/2009 3:21:26 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

It has to come out! No one can condone not enforcing the Constitution.


15 posted on 02/09/2009 4:45:44 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak; curiosity

On the other hand, probability alone assures us that there are likely a few in Congress who think honestly about the birth certificate problem in a manner very similar to that portrayed in this letter.


16 posted on 02/09/2009 7:25:51 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Who knows? He was a federal judge—maybe the issue really interests him.


17 posted on 02/09/2009 8:47:35 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Who knows? He was a federal judge—maybe the issue really interests him.

Then he should have objected when the electoral votes were counted-- that was the one time that the issue could actually have been raised.

18 posted on 02/10/2009 11:19:57 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sorry screen name in use

Like clockwork I see Obama/DNC employees/deniers have arrived. The former judge knows what Dr. Edwin Vieira also knows and eventually it will come out.

Wonder why Hillary wanted Secretary of State? Because the people above her in line of sucession will be removed for fraud and she becomes POTUS. The Clintons are probably dropping their dime through Berg soon.


19 posted on 02/10/2009 3:44:42 PM PST by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Panicking?? Tell Shauna not to pay you more, your way too obvious! Photobucket
20 posted on 02/10/2009 3:48:11 PM PST by mojitojoe (If you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson