Skip to comments.
Giving the President Access to Your Computer
The American Thinker Blog ^
| August 30, 2009
| Larrey Anderson
Posted on 08/30/2009 2:17:09 PM PDT by Scanian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
08/30/2009 2:17:09 PM PDT
by
Scanian
To: Scanian
Crickets down at the aCLU?
2
posted on
08/30/2009 2:18:47 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Dude! Where's my country?)
To: Scanian
No wonder Chavez cheered the promotions of Obama.
3
posted on
08/30/2009 2:19:20 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Scanian
Hugo is muy jealous.
4
posted on
08/30/2009 2:21:28 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
To: Scanian
Oppressive socialism. Is this not what the founding fathers warned us about in the Constitution???
5
posted on
08/30/2009 2:21:43 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: Scanian
EXPELL SNOWE from the party! She is cutting another backroom deal...wonder what she is being promised this time?
6
posted on
08/30/2009 2:22:52 PM PDT
by
WellyP
To: Scanian
This is a bit to far even for the Obama Adm. If we let BOzo keep this up soon we will have no country.
7
posted on
08/30/2009 2:25:53 PM PDT
by
ANGGAPO
(Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
To: ANGGAPO
“If we let BOzo keep this up soon we will have no country.”
THAT’S THE PLAN!
8
posted on
08/30/2009 2:27:08 PM PDT
by
WellyP
To: Scanian
From the people that were SHOCKED AND APPALLED that a tiny % of international phone calls to terrorist countries might be listened to.
Un-freaking-believable
(but too believable)
9
posted on
08/30/2009 2:27:12 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: Scanian
10
posted on
08/30/2009 2:29:05 PM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: Scanian
Yellow Snowe again ... NO!
11
posted on
08/30/2009 2:32:30 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: Scanian
Hey all you lib lurkers out there that think this may be a great idea. Just picture a GOP administration with this kind of power. Hmm, not sounding like such a good idea anymore, is it? This is exactly why we need limited government. We do not want nor need government in our private lives. That's why they're called "private." It doesn't matter what political party you are affiliated with, where you see yourself on the conservative <-> liberal scale. This had better scare the {expletive} out of you. Every US citizen should be saying this is a bad idea.
12
posted on
08/30/2009 2:41:17 PM PDT
by
ThunderSleeps
(obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
To: Scanian
Could bad polling numbers institute an emergency?
13
posted on
08/30/2009 2:41:49 PM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: VRWC For Truth
Yellow Snowe again ... NO! LOL...that is priceless!!
~~~~I bet she can't write her name either :)
15
posted on
08/30/2009 2:48:34 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: Scanian
Let’s look at the passage given in the post:
“direct the national response to the cyber threat” - does that mean he can do anything he wants?
“develop detailed cyber...plans” - nothing here about implementing a plan.
“review critical functions” - what functions. Anyway, he’s just reviewing them.
“direct the periodic mapping” - what is “mapping” It’s essential to know this in order to understand the bill.
“direct the national response to the cyber-threat” - does this also mean he can do anything he wants?
“review critical functions” - this is just a review but maybe he must see our private files in order to do the review
The bill needs to say what privacy rights citizens will be left with. It needs to be examined as to its constitutionality.
Seems like the measures proposed in the bill would fall within the purview of the CIA or NSA. Why is it being elevated to the presidential level.
16
posted on
08/30/2009 2:49:38 PM PDT
by
frposty
(I'm a simpleton)
To: frposty
Sure, it gives him the right to do anything he wants. Why else would the libtards want to do this?
17
posted on
08/30/2009 2:58:26 PM PDT
by
Scanian
To: ThunderSleeps
The libs mainly want such power so that they never have to put up with a pubbie administration ever again.
Every move the Obamanoids make has to do with the acquisition and preservation of their own political power.
It’s really no more complicated than that.
18
posted on
08/30/2009 3:01:07 PM PDT
by
Scanian
To: frposty
19
posted on
08/30/2009 3:12:21 PM PDT
by
WellyP
To: Scanian
Another reason Melissa Hathaway, White House Cybersecurity Czarina, quit on Aug. 3.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson