Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giving the President Access to Your Computer
The American Thinker Blog ^ | August 30, 2009 | Larrey Anderson

Posted on 08/30/2009 2:17:09 PM PDT by Scanian

Democrat Senator Jay Rockefeller and liberal Republican Olympia Snowe are still working on that comprehensive cyber security bill that would give the president control over private portions of the Internet. Rockefeller and Snowe first announced their idea last spring.

CNET has obtained a copy of the new draft legislation S. 773. Part of the bill reads:

(B) may, if the President finds it necessary for the national defense and security, and in co- ordination with relevant industry sectors, direct the national response to the cyber threat and the timely restoration of the affected critical in- frastructure information system or network; (3) shall, in coordination with various critical infrastructure industry sectors, develop detailed cyber emergency response and restoration plans for each critical infrastructure industry sector; (4) shall, through the appropriate department or agency, review critical functions that would be needed after a cybersecurity attack and develop a strategy for the acquisition, storage, and periodic re- placement of equipment to support those functions; (5) shall direct the periodic mapping of Federal Government and United States critical infrastruc- ture information systems or networks, and shall de- velop metrics to measure the effectiveness of the mapping process; (B) may, if the President finds it necessary for the national defense and security, and in co- ordination with relevant industry sectors, direct the national response to the cyber threat and the timely restoration of the affected critical in- frastructure information system or network; (3) shall, in coordination with various critical infrastructure industry sectors, develop detailed cyber emergency response and restoration plans for each critical infrastructure industry sector; (4) shall, through the appropriate department or agency, review critical functions that would be needed after a cybersecurity attack and develop a strategy for the acquisition, storage, and periodic replacement of equipment to support those functions; (5) shall direct the periodic mapping of Federal Government and United States critical infrastructure information systems or networks, and shall develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of the mapping process;

In short, the federal government would be given the power to have direct access to all of our records (in the guise of protecting them from being destroyed.)

Here is my advice: buy an extra hard drive and kill this god-awful legislation. Now.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: cybersecurity; internet; rockefeller; snowe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2009 2:17:09 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Crickets down at the aCLU?


2 posted on 08/30/2009 2:18:47 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
No wonder Chavez cheered the promotions of Obama.
3 posted on 08/30/2009 2:19:20 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Hugo is muy jealous.

4 posted on 08/30/2009 2:21:28 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Oppressive socialism. Is this not what the founding fathers warned us about in the Constitution???


5 posted on 08/30/2009 2:21:43 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

EXPELL SNOWE from the party! She is cutting another backroom deal...wonder what she is being promised this time?


6 posted on 08/30/2009 2:22:52 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
This is a bit to far even for the Obama Adm. If we let BOzo keep this up soon we will have no country.
7 posted on 08/30/2009 2:25:53 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

“If we let BOzo keep this up soon we will have no country.”

THAT’S THE PLAN!


8 posted on 08/30/2009 2:27:08 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

From the people that were SHOCKED AND APPALLED that a tiny % of international phone calls to terrorist countries might be listened to.

Un-freaking-believable

(but too believable)


9 posted on 08/30/2009 2:27:12 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

bookmark.


10 posted on 08/30/2009 2:29:05 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Yellow Snowe again ... NO!


11 posted on 08/30/2009 2:32:30 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Hey all you lib lurkers out there that think this may be a great idea. Just picture a GOP administration with this kind of power. Hmm, not sounding like such a good idea anymore, is it? This is exactly why we need limited government. We do not want nor need government in our private lives. That's why they're called "private." It doesn't matter what political party you are affiliated with, where you see yourself on the conservative <-> liberal scale. This had better scare the {expletive} out of you. Every US citizen should be saying this is a bad idea.
12 posted on 08/30/2009 2:41:17 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Could bad polling numbers institute an emergency?


13 posted on 08/30/2009 2:41:49 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: VRWC For Truth
Yellow Snowe again ... NO!

LOL...that is priceless!!

~~~~I bet she can't write her name either :)

15 posted on 08/30/2009 2:48:34 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Let’s look at the passage given in the post:

“direct the national response to the cyber threat” - does that mean he can do anything he wants?

“develop detailed cyber...plans” - nothing here about implementing a plan.

“review critical functions” - what functions. Anyway, he’s just reviewing them.

“direct the periodic mapping” - what is “mapping” It’s essential to know this in order to understand the bill.

“direct the national response to the cyber-threat” - does this also mean he can do anything he wants?

“review critical functions” - this is just a review but maybe he must see our private files in order to do the review

The bill needs to say what privacy rights citizens will be left with. It needs to be examined as to its constitutionality.

Seems like the measures proposed in the bill would fall within the purview of the CIA or NSA. Why is it being elevated to the presidential level.


16 posted on 08/30/2009 2:49:38 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frposty

Sure, it gives him the right to do anything he wants. Why else would the libtards want to do this?


17 posted on 08/30/2009 2:58:26 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

The libs mainly want such power so that they never have to put up with a pubbie administration ever again.

Every move the Obamanoids make has to do with the acquisition and preservation of their own political power.

It’s really no more complicated than that.


18 posted on 08/30/2009 3:01:07 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: frposty

I’ll tell you, I trust the CIA, NSA and the ONI a LOT more than OBAMA and his THUGS!

ONI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Naval_Intelligence


19 posted on 08/30/2009 3:12:21 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Another reason Melissa Hathaway, White House Cybersecurity Czarina, quit on Aug. 3.


20 posted on 08/30/2009 3:28:49 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson