Scroll all the way down here for answer.
Posted on 12/17/2009 10:14:33 AM PST by opentalk
With a mere investment of $780,000 Soros and his allies were able to suborn free elections in the states of Montana, West Virginia, Missouri, Oregon, in 2008, and in Minnesota, Ohio, New Mexico, Nevada and Iowa, in 2006.
How did he achieve so much with so little? He founded a 527 group which funded candidates in one kind of race in which the victor has the most influence over election integrity, and in which there is so little political competition: the Secretaries of State.
In each State the SoS job is entrusted with overseeing the protection of free and fair elections. Of those states where Soros & company succeeded installing liberals as Secretary of State, how many did Obama win in the primaries and in the general election? Count them…
Matthew Vadum, writing for the American Spectator, attributes this success to a little known political action organization:
The vehicle for this planned hijacking of democracy is a below-the-radar non-federal “527″ group called the Secretary of State Project. The entity can accept unlimited financial contributions and doesn’t have to disclose them publicly until well after the election.
It was revealed during a panel discussion at the Democratic Party’s convention last year that the Democracy Alliance, a financial clearinghouse created by Soros and Progressive insurance magnate Peter B. Lewis, approved the Secretary of State Project as a grantee. The Democracy Alliance aspires to create a permanent political infrastructure of nonprofits, think tanks, media outlets, leadership schools, and activist groups — a kind of “vast left-wing conspiracy” to compete with the conservative movement. It has brokered more than $100 million in grants to liberal nonprofits, including ACORN.
Vadum details how each candidate supported by the Soros project, is associated with election fraud and voter fraud.
His entire article is a must read.
It behooves American citizens to wake up and run for Secretary of State in their home states, to see that democracy and constitutional freedom is protected. If patriotic groups do not sacrificially support and promote such candidates, waiting for the elections in 2010 and 2012, will be in vain.
I am just about ready to respond to my most recent funding request from the RNC.
By now they are getting tired of hearing about how we are now donating only to individual candidates and not them. Sooner or later they will get the message and get with the program or watch their influence wane.
I am not trying to give anyone a guilty conscience. I just think that if we citizens don’t really step up (me included) that we may regret it.
I am still up in the air on donating to the RNC, because I would rather give directly to candidates that are really standing up for what is right. The DNC is going to be overfunding their candidates that will be running against people like Michelle Buchanan.
Just say'n...
5.56mm
Reminder:
On Friday, when Dede Scozzafava dropped out of NY-23, she said she hoped to work toward a “stronger GOP.”
It has been 48 hours since Dede Scozzafava dropped out of NY-23.
After $900,000.00 wasted on her candidacy by the GOP, the candidate is now returning the support by encouraging votes for the Democrat.
Exactly
~~Dear Lord, I’m afraid to even *think* of
what they’re plotting next ...........
Let us take some precious time to have a sane,
prayerful and peaceful Christmas and Holiday
Season, surrounded by our loved ones, and then
we resume our mission: to *never* give up the
fight for this great nation.
God bless our country, our brave military,
and us all .. each and every one.
I suspect martial law will be declared on some pretext and there won’t be elections anymore.
mmm mmm mmm
As for Soros, if he collaborated with the Nazis, what makes him better than John Demjanjuk, an 89 year old man suffering from dementia and other medical issues who was deported this year to stand trial?
His money? I am not sure to what extent his collaboration (if any) has been documented. The last thing we need is to open ourselves up legally to a man with deep, deep pockets. But if there are facts out there, they need to be in the public arena.
Maybe someone has a piece of lead with his name on it.
I was really surprised to see who it was. History does repeat itself when apathy sets in.
If Wiki is accurate .. it’s stunning.
The parallels between the two are uncanny.
As long as we have brilliant Freepers like you Star we will remain one step ahead.
Chilling.
On Sept 18th 2008 there was an electronic bank run on the fed to the tune of 500 billion dollars . We do not even know who the banks were, the fed won’t be audited as Ron Paul has been pressing for.
Any bets that the former Nazi supporting SOROS was involved? And that he and some of his Arab banking froends got on the stick to create financial panic? Why won;t the fed reveal who the banks were? Why is it being treated as a state secret? Because the obama policy with Muslim nations would be revealed as a complete lie, and the economic conditions under which the election ocurred would be revealed as manufactured.
And the traitors among us would be revealed as well, in time, by just following the paper trails on the bank run, which was an act of war, now covered up by the Obama Junta and his running dogs.
Remember this thread from March 2008?
Posted on Monday, March 31, 2008 6:40:27 PM by RobRoy
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 4:20 PM Subject: CLOSED Congress Session Last Night: Only 4th Time In 176 Years !
SPECIAL “CLOSED SESSION” OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED A LOT MORE THAN THE PENDING SECURITY SURVEILLANCE PROVISIONS!
This was only the fourth time in 176 years that Congress has closed its doors to the public. What was it that they were discussing that they do NOT want us to know about?
Word has begun leaking from last nights special, closed-door session of the United States House of Representatives.
Not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they also discussed:
1. the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008,
2. the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009,
3. the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse,
4. advance round-ups of “insurgent U.S. citizens” likely to move against the government,
5. the detention of those rounded-up at “REX 84” camps constructed throughout the USA,
6. the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses,
7. the location of “safe facilities” for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest,
8. the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool),
9. the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon.
Members of Congress were FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed. Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country, they have begun leaking info. More details coming later today and over the weekend. SPREAD THE WORD!!!
Video here: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=46d_1205873088
I am convinced the downturn in our economy was a result of manipulation meant to influence the Presidential election. I can only think of one person with the wealth and means.
Of course the feds will not be audited. We would discover who truly owns this nation (and the President). Hint: Defintely not a natural born citizen. No if’s, and’s or but’s.
I’ve said for the last 12 years that the Dems are either really, REALLY stupid, or worse, they are doing it on purpose.
I now think it is the latter, and the Repubs are with them.
They are all owned by the same person. Think of how many people have been bought & paid for since the end of WWII.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.