Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Post: Truman, Ike, Reagan: Next Up, Sarah Palin!
Citizen Palin 4 President ^ | Ralph Peters

Posted on 03/17/2010 7:46:25 AM PDT by MaxCUA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-299 next last
To: se_ohio_young_conservative

No, I know that. Just want to set the record straight.


61 posted on 03/17/2010 11:36:10 AM PDT by rintense (Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: factmart

Which jobs? Why do you not answer me? You said 3 factmart. What are they?

Facts m’kay?

Reagan wasn’t running for POTUS at 45. We have a young one now. I would not use that argument.


62 posted on 03/17/2010 11:36:31 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: factmart

Point taken. But it’s very much like a public office. And during Reagan’s time there it was quite eventful.


63 posted on 03/17/2010 11:37:18 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: onyx

ping


64 posted on 03/17/2010 11:42:59 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Or..

As I said the other night.

People who buy into the mainstream media line that “Palin is stupid”. And you seem to be one of them.


65 posted on 03/17/2010 11:43:24 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
People who buy into the mainstream media line that “Palin is stupid”. And you seem to be one of them.

I don't think she's stupid at all.

66 posted on 03/17/2010 11:46:01 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I doubt that..

But lets cut through the bull here.

What is your problem with Sarah Palin ?


67 posted on 03/17/2010 11:47:41 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative; EveningStar
Sorry skippy, there's a lot about SP that makes her unelectable in my opinion and in the opinion of many other freepers. Stating so doesn't make us Palin-haters.

She would need seventy million votes at a minimum to win the WH in 2012. At least half of those votes will have to come from the moderate and independent blocs. Many will have to be Americans who voted for obama.

Please explain in as much detail as you can exactly how Sarah (who is perceived as the darling of the right, has very limited experience and who, like it or not, quit halfway through her first term) is going to win over ten to twenty million of these voters.

68 posted on 03/17/2010 11:50:23 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

You aren’t too bright are you? You could have checked my posting history and you could have answered your own question.

So figure it out for yourself. I have no hate for Palin, I like her. Is she going to be the best candidate? She is a whole lot better than Flip, but I am not yet ready to sell my vote almost 3 years before the next election. I will watch who enters and what they do and say.

Sound fair? Palin isn’t the problem, her overly sold supporters are. They don’t want her to win, they work to alienate people with an unreal praise that keeps itself fed by demonizing everyone who isn’t really ready to campaign yet and have doubts. It by no means is a final statement that all those people won’t vote for her.

You folks even pretend that she has no downside at all. She does. And so will the others. How many We Love Mitt threads do you see? If you see one, they get excoriated.

It is the nature of the beast. Politics. Anyone who enters knows they have a hell of a job ahead.


69 posted on 03/17/2010 11:50:53 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Look around. Look at the economy. Look at unemployment. Look at what they are doing in Washington D.C. right now. Look at the amount of spending and consider the inflationary doom.

Thats how..

You are using conventional wisdom. This is not 1988 and these are not normal times.


70 posted on 03/17/2010 11:52:44 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Then why do you come onto to these threads and trash Palin supporters who agree with you on probably 90% of what you believe ?


71 posted on 03/17/2010 11:56:16 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
"The size of many countries, the 7th largest economy in the world"

7th or 4th? What was bigger? US, Germany, France. I think back then, California was still bigger than China. The UK is the only one I'm not sure of. It may have been bigger than California, but not by much.

72 posted on 03/17/2010 11:56:20 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I’m not sure, either ;-)


73 posted on 03/17/2010 11:57:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
And with everything you catalogue where is the convincing argument that seventy million American voters will turn to Palin to rescue them? She doesn't have the experience and, like it or not, she did quit the one qualifying job she did have.

Sorry but simply listing the problems we face does not equate with explaining how Palin will get all those middle, middle/right, middle/left and independent votes. You can try again though.

74 posted on 03/17/2010 12:02:47 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
"I’m not sure, either ;-)"

What's discouraging is, despite wherever California was then, it's well below that level today. China, India, Mexico, Russia, Brazil and Italy have all surpassed CA, although California's own population growth has exceeded or met the growth in those other countries, save for China and India. California has all but lost it's industrial base, and that hurts its economic fortune more than anything.

Incidentally, I forgot Japan. Japan's economy was bigger than California back in Reagan's day.

75 posted on 03/17/2010 12:04:29 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

If the economy is bad....

ANY warm body will be able to beat Obama. Palin has the the best potential to do do.

She has charisma. And she still has more executive experiance than our current President.


76 posted on 03/17/2010 12:05:34 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

to do so..


77 posted on 03/17/2010 12:06:49 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

I just get sick of the fact that you folks go on threads about people like Michelle Bachmann and because people may say nice things about her, start calling her worthless boob and flaming everyone you perceive to be a co contender in the presidential race.

Sad part, it really isn’t Palin doing it. Your minds are closed 3 years before the next election and Palin hasn’t even declared herself a candidate yet.

If you want an all Pro Palin site, start one.

She will be a top contender if she enters, it will be up to her at that time to win my vote in the primary.


78 posted on 03/17/2010 12:07:05 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Who would you pick Ol’ Wise One who knows more than most?


79 posted on 03/17/2010 12:10:32 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Ditto!

That’s exactly what YOU are doing!


80 posted on 03/17/2010 12:16:49 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson