Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spokesperson for Army Doctor Challenging Obama’s Eligibility speaks
The Post & email ^ | 4/19/2010 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 04/19/2010 8:32:58 PM PDT by adamjefferson

HIGHLY-DECORATED FLIGHT SURGEON HAS REFUSED ALL ORDERS UNTIL OBAMA PROVES HIS ELIGIBILITY ... MRS. RONDEAU: Thank you for agreeing to an interview at such short notice, Mrs. Hemenway.  I’ve read the website set up for Lt. Col. Lakin, and I know he had contacted his senators and representative before deciding to stop following orders.  What response did he get from his chain of command, and specifically, from General George Casey? MRS. HEMENWAY: He made an Article 138 inquiry, and the letter that came back said something like “No one in the Department of Defense,” and this was to include General George Casey, “can answer this question, and you lack standing.”  So that was obviously not a satisfactory answer.  Lt. Col. Lakin did reach out often to coworkers and superiors struggling with this issue and tried to get help with it.  I worked at the Pentagon for five years, and it is extremely disappointing that our military leadership knows that other officers have done this, that other officers have been involved in a lawsuit, and ...

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; lakin; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Great interview.
1 posted on 04/19/2010 8:32:58 PM PDT by adamjefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

“Lack standing” has been the ruling from all the Clinton-appointed federal judges that have tossed out the lawsuits.

Or they say: The voters have spoken in the last election.

???

If the voters voted to reinstate prayer in schools they’d toss it out tomorrow. They care what voters think?

That’s not the issue. Issue is: Obama has not proven he is eligible for the office of president. WHO has standing to challenge that? No Court has yet answered.


2 posted on 04/19/2010 8:36:14 PM PDT by TigerBait
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerBait

their attitude is that a person only has standing if the _resident is effectung them directly and doing them harm or standing in their way of progression (or some such crap)

I want the statement itself challenged and those judges FORCED to defend their statements. EVERY citizen will incur harm if the person taking the office was not eligible and has alligences to other countries.

I would see the military has being in direct line for questioning their orders if they believe those orders to be unlawful (isn’t that what we all have heard from the hippies??)

as a citizen, I am directly effected by 0bamas tax policies... pushed thru congress... and budget approved... and the IRS out to hunt for their pennies. I would contend I would have standing if I didn’t file... then get charged for not filing... my defense being that the congressional budget was not signed into law... as only the president can do that ... and witness testimony currently shows 0bama being ineligible to hold office... and until further ADMISSIBLE proof is provided (a jpeg is not admissible as a valid birth document)... we are left with witness testimony


3 posted on 04/19/2010 8:48:08 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson
It seems like the “lacks standing” line fails in the case of an officer in the military worried he is taking illegal orders. The Nuremberg trials wouldn't have accepted not questioning authority if a defendant had tried to claim they hadn't challenged the orders because they felt they “lacked standing”.
4 posted on 04/19/2010 8:49:37 PM PDT by highlander_UW (First we take down the Democrats, then we clean the Augean stable that is the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Without debating all the issues covered in this interview, let me say that this is one of the best all encompassing explanations of the situation that I have read.

Share this with anyone who is on the fence or still a denier.


5 posted on 04/19/2010 8:52:47 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hypo

Well, this is interesting:

But Mr. Hemenway would say, “Because of the way the laws are written, we can debate whether they’re fair or not fair, if born on American soil to an American citizen, he would have been considered natural born.”

parsy


6 posted on 04/19/2010 9:15:12 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Heck, I’m only halfway through this thing. But there is a case and I believe it is going to have to come to some kind of conclusion. There is an opportunity here for some aspiring reporter to become the next supper hero, I just someone takes it. This is starting to feel like the biggest conspiracy in the history of mankind.


7 posted on 04/19/2010 9:32:27 PM PDT by JoSixChip (It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

SFL!


8 posted on 04/19/2010 9:38:53 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Great read. Is it true that both parents must be citizens and he’d not qualify even if he was born in Hawaii?

I’m so paranoid about these people that I wonder if the LTC isn’t going to force this issue then zero produces his b.c. right before the 2012 elections. Or it’s simply postponed until then. Then all the press apologizes for him even being questioned and those who’ve come to our side bounce back to his side.


9 posted on 04/19/2010 9:42:18 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Founding Fathers.....grave....rolling over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Or he could become a dinner hero. Sorry, couldn’t resist.


10 posted on 04/19/2010 9:44:34 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Founding Fathers.....grave....rolling over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

You know, I was fine not knowing I screwed that up.


11 posted on 04/19/2010 9:49:21 PM PDT by JoSixChip (It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

Poor Olry, while correct on many facts, has a hard time being taken seriously. This new spokesperson may make it really interesting. She is good!

SFL? What’s that? Checking the urban dictionary...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SFL


12 posted on 04/19/2010 9:50:06 PM PDT by adamjefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; rxsid

ping.


13 posted on 04/19/2010 9:51:07 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

SFL = Save For Later?


14 posted on 04/19/2010 9:51:11 PM PDT by JoSixChip (It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Wow, I thought this thread would have gotten a little more attention. Where are all the obumber defenders?


15 posted on 04/19/2010 10:02:21 PM PDT by JoSixChip (It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I think an anti-birther posted something at No. 6 above.

parsy


16 posted on 04/19/2010 10:04:16 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

I meant debating them over again. sorry if you misunderstood. I’m in full agreement with all the facts and the interview.

cheers


17 posted on 04/19/2010 10:05:04 PM PDT by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Proving lack of eligibility may be the only way we can get the commie out of our White House.


18 posted on 04/19/2010 10:14:49 PM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Any birth certificate he presents needs to fit what the HDOH has already said, which means it has to be amended and doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence.

He’s backed into a corner.


19 posted on 04/19/2010 10:15:47 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Eligibility challenger
to go public today =

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=143021


20 posted on 04/19/2010 10:41:41 PM PDT by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson