Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Peek Inside 'The Manchurian President'
canadiansential ^ | Wednesday May 5, 2010

Posted on 05/05/2010 8:54:20 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

The book's introduction:

"Barack Obama is backed by and deeply tied to an anti-American fringe nexus that, as this book will show, was instrumental not only in mentoring Obama and helping him to build his political career, but essentially in overthrowing the moderate wing of the Democratic Party and in securing and powerfully influencing Obama's presidency.

"As will be seen, these radical associates not only continue to influence Obama and White House strategy, but some are directly involved in creating the very policies intended to undermine or radically transform the United States of America."

Inconvenient, especially, because it's backed by documentary evidence that makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to dismiss.

Radical, pro-Obama Prog activists will, as expected, attack, mentioning irrelevant, unrelated trivialities, the author and the organization selling the book, without even discussing the content and the proof.

"I believe this work is crucial to Americans from across the political spectrum," says Klein, "including mainstream Democrats who should be alarmed that their party has been hijacked by an extreme-left fringe bent on permanently changing the party to fit its radical agenda.

"Indeed, this book will document, with new information, Obama's own involvement with a socialist party whose explicit goal was to infiltrate and eventually take over the Democratic Party and mold it into a socialist organization," Klein claims.

Klein began investigating Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and broke major national stories. He first exposed the politician's association with Ayers in a widely circulated WND article.

The story prompted the Nation magazine to lament, via the CBS News website, that "mainstream reporters now call the Obama campaign to ask about Klein's articles."

Heeeeere come the attacks by those who don't want people to know the truth about Obama's background... They're the same people who've been going around making up unsubstantiated (and gleefully trumpeted by the anti-Palin Big Media) crap to smear all over Sarah Palin, because, as a real, honest-to-goodness, patriotic American and very potential next resident of the White House, she's a threat to their subversive agenda.

You know, if anyone actually had any meaningful, and proven, dirt on Sarah Palin, they'd already have published an explosive book for us to see the proof for ourselves. Wonder why this hasn't happened, yet? Perhaps because the anti-Palin propagandists have nothing on her and have to settle for making up BS to feed to the Big Media to make viral via traditional sources, away from which The People are turning in droves, and aren't going to listen to?

People want proof, not smears.

This book has proof


TOPICS: Education; Government; Health/Medicine; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: bho44; democrats; elections; leftists; media; mediascum; msm; obama; palin; sarahpalin

1 posted on 05/05/2010 8:54:20 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


2 posted on 05/05/2010 8:59:30 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
A more wicked man has never held the office of President. We The People are paying for this slide into wickedness our nation has embraced for too long. Now, a man who protected the murder of born alive babies holds the highest office in the land ... to our utter shame.
3 posted on 05/05/2010 9:04:26 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Klein? Is this Joe Klein?


4 posted on 05/05/2010 9:06:25 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Not ripping the guy who posted this, but the author of the piece: It is the DEMOCRAT party not the democratic party.

Idiot writer.


5 posted on 05/05/2010 9:08:26 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I think he is Canadian...so I cut him some slack


6 posted on 05/05/2010 9:10:43 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
I am beginning to believe that this book may be very, very important - not the usual political claptrap, but real, vital information for the electorate to acquire. The missing part of course, is RINO funding, and the treasonous secret RINO ties to the very same money and political/economic powers! IMHO
7 posted on 05/05/2010 9:13:08 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Yeah but geez, so many American journalists do the same d@mn thing.


8 posted on 05/05/2010 9:16:11 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

American journalists are dumb and can’t write a lick anyway! HaHaha!


9 posted on 05/05/2010 9:17:16 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Please read Barak Obama's Rules for Revolution
10 posted on 05/05/2010 9:17:38 PM PDT by LiteKeeper ("It's the peoples' seat!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

>A more wicked man has never held the office of President.<

.
Don’t blame Obama — blame Congress for allowing this abomination to continue without any questioning.


11 posted on 05/05/2010 10:20:15 PM PDT by 353FMG (Islam -- America's road to destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Thanks for that. It couldn’t be set out more clearly.


12 posted on 05/05/2010 10:26:55 PM PDT by Nipfan (The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

Hannity interviewed him last night on his television show. Aaron Klein seemed very confident and well-informed. I also think this book will be a killer.


13 posted on 05/05/2010 10:41:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

That’s a great document - every American needs to read it!

David Horowitz understands better than anyone who these people are and what Obama really represents.


14 posted on 05/06/2010 1:24:13 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama and Brennan think that 20% of terrorists re-joining the battle is just fine with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

#5 on Amazon already:

http://www.amazon.com/Manchurian-President-Communists-Socialists-Anti-American/dp/1935071874/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1273152123&sr=8-1


15 posted on 05/06/2010 6:58:11 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Indeed.

Sales trajectory for this book seems almost like Sarah Palin’s “Going Rogue”.

It’s already in the top 10.

http://www.amazon.com/Manchurian-President-Communists-Socialists-Anti-American/dp/1935071874/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1273152123&sr=8-1


16 posted on 05/06/2010 7:01:01 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

David understands because he was one of them, and his parents were card-carrying Communists. I am so glad that he has seen the true light, and is now informing us!


17 posted on 05/06/2010 7:57:20 AM PDT by LiteKeeper ("It's the peoples' seat!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

That is great news. Americans have an appetite to find out who this jug-eared liar really is.


18 posted on 05/06/2010 12:47:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader; onyx; grey_whiskers; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

A Peek Inside 'The Manchurian President'
canadiansential ^ | Wednesday May 5, 2010,/i>

The book's introduction:

"Barack 0bama is backed by and deeply tied to an anti-American fringe nexus that, as this book will show, was instrumental not only in mentoring 0bama and helping him to build his political career, but essentially in overthrowing the moderate wing of the Democratic Party and in securing and powerfully influencing 0bama's presidency.

"As will be seen, these radical associates not only continue to influence 0bama and White House strategy, but some are directly involved in creating the very policies intended to undermine or radically transform the United States of America."

Inconvenient, especially, because it's backed by documentary evidence that makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to dismiss.

Radical, pro-0bama Prog activists will, as expected, attack, mentioning irrelevant, unrelated trivialities, the author and the organization selling the book, without even discussing the content and the proof.

[snip]

"Indeed, this book will document, with new information, 0bama's own involvement with a socialist party whose explicit goal was to infiltrate and eventually take over the Democratic Party and mold it into a socialist organization," Klein claims.

. . . . Check out article.

[Thanks, Fractal Trader.]

19 posted on 05/06/2010 3:12:52 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I just checked both Amazon and eReader to see if it is available for download, but not yet, alas!


20 posted on 05/06/2010 3:17:47 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Bummer! He didn't like my artwork?


21 posted on 05/06/2010 3:48:20 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income... Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

bump for later


22 posted on 05/07/2010 4:02:22 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; Bigtigermike

“Not ripping the guy who posted this, but the author of the piece: It is the DEMOCRAT party not the democratic party.”

Actually, I think you are incorrect. It’s the Democratic Party and a member is a Democrat. I’d be careful throwing the ‘idiot’ word around, LOL.

http://www.democrats.org/

“The Democratic Party”


23 posted on 05/07/2010 1:00:09 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Well it isn’t one or the other consistently then.

In the sentence, “When the democrats caucus, it’s a field day for nuts.” you would never say “democratics caucus”.

I mean even look at their website address: democrats.org.

Not democratics.org!

I think they use this to imply theirs is inherently a ‘democratic’ party when it isn’t, and that any other party isn’t. The Democrat party makes a hell of a lot more sense to call them. we call them democrats. The Southern Democrats, not Southern Democratics. Anytime they are discussed by anyone it’s “Well what should the democrats do?”

Except when the word “Party” is behind the word Democrat, we have no “ic” added to it. Seems that ain’t right. We hear and use “Democrat” far, far more often than the other.

But to me it’s a whole Bolshevik (majority) party vs Menshevik (minority) party issue. If you say it that way, it makes it sound like they are the only party that’s democratic. It’s actually hypocritical to say it that way.


24 posted on 05/07/2010 3:35:05 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

It is a matter of usage. When referring to a person or people, it’s democrat or democrats. When referring to the party, it’s Democratic. Kind of like saying someone is Chinese. You wouldn’t say they are citizens of Chinese, they are citizens of China. But when referring to a specific person or persons, they are Chinese.


25 posted on 05/07/2010 6:23:49 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

The difference here is it’s a word that doesn’t ONLY describe a political party, it’s a word that has its own definition, as a form of government. They get a boost from the other actual definition when people say “Democratic”, you automatically think ‘fair election process’ or something like that. You don’t get any kind of similar bump from “Republican” - who the hell thinks “Republic” and thinks “OH they are rule of law folks” nowadays? Hardly anyone knows we are a Constitutional Republic, or what being a Republic means. (FAR superior to a democracy but if you are a dumb ass public school kid or journalist, you’ll be thinking a democracy is the highest form of government around.)


26 posted on 05/07/2010 6:34:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson