Posted on 07/26/2010 2:40:54 PM PDT by curth
How ironic that on a day when we celebrate the 20th anniversary of the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, The Daily Caller released 15 pages of JournoListers’ email exchanges about a dark and demented conspiracy regarding my son, Trig.
It’s tough to fittingly describe these numerous members of the mainstream media who actively engaged in the debate about this conspiracy back when I was first introduced as John McCain’s running mate, and it’s impossible to legitimize any “prominent” media publication that continues to traffic in this bizarre narrative today. It wasn’t just a few fringe characters in that JournoList discussion. It included writers for major newspapers, magazines, and online news publications. Those participating in this immature exchange in attempts to plant seeds of doubt and falsely accuse even included a famous historian.
This JournoList exchange exposes the warped nature of today’s media, thus explaining why many of us are forced, in fairness to the public, to utilize other mediums to communicate until the mainstream media wakes up and begins respecting the public’s intelligence and desire for truth in reporting. There is a sickness and darkness in today’s liberal media. With revelations like the JournoList exchanges, may the light keep shining to expose the problem.
It’s always darkest before the dawn. My hope, therefore, is that today, marking the anniversary of our nation’s attempt to show respect for our brothers and sisters, sons and daughters with special needs, will also mark the beginning of a new, more respectful discourse among members of our media who at least aspire to be fair and objective.
- Sarah Palin
I’m sure Freud would have something fascinating to say about that.
Dear Sarah,
I call them the Enemedia.
Please use it often, and use it with a smile.
They’ve earned that title.
-R.F.
YeeOWCH! Not the arm pit! (My memory as a 4 yr. old burning my arm pit with a 4th of July sparkler!)
GREAT word!
I agree: Sue the list and any member who coordinated against her. She certainly has standing/has been damaged. It would also make it possible for her to use discovery to get all the names on the list.
You don't have to like these guys. They are your enemies. Just don't fantasize about torturing them: it isn't good for you.
Her writing is Reaganesque.
I’d love to see her mow those syphilitic squirrels down but what sort of standing does she have?
Or in the case of the lib journalists, on to the smaller appendages.
Substitute the word damaged for standing. To prove standing one has to show they have been damaged in some way. She’d have no problem proving damages. Would just have to put people on the stand that parroted the LIST false statements.
Is it any different than human urine?
It's supposed to be the closest thing to skunk.
I think people who loathe this woman are demented.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.