Posted on 10/09/2010 12:36:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
An emergency peaceful protest at Concord Hospital was held Friday due to the state of New Hampshire forcibly removing, with the aid of the hospital, 15-hour old newborn, Cheyenne Irish, from her parents.
The baby's father, John Irish, alleges all the charges for the removal are trumped and he does not know why according to his statement at the protest. (See Oppression by Oath Youtube video below, posted by Adventures In the Free State)
Adventures in the Free State writes:
"A day-old infant was abducted by NH DCYF on 10/7/2010, from and allegedly with the complicity of Concord Hospital, apparently at least partially because her father had affirmed, by association with Oath Keepers, an oath he'd taken to support and defend the U.S. Constitution. An oath government employees take every day. Do they respect their own promises as much? Do you care...?
Mother of the baby, Stephanie Janvrin's former partner and legal husband, David Taylor refuses to sign divorce papers and claims that he is the father of the baby according to statements made at the protest.
"He will not accept or sign the papers" for a divorce. "He just will not do it," she said.
Many women become Targeted Individuals after separating from their partners according to self-support group communications.
One woman at the protest said, "This is suppose to be America, not Nazi Germany. You are not suppose to have your children stolen because of your affiliation with a group."
She said she joined Oath Keepers earlier in the day due to the baby's removal from her parents and that she learned about the protest on Facebook.
One stated reason for the baby's forced removal is her father's affiliation with Oath Keepers that officials described as a "militia group."
The affidavit is "fabricated and trumped up," said Mr. Irish.
The stated reason that baby Chayenne was removed is "abuse and neglect."
During the protest, a sergeant and another law officer of Concord Police Department handed a notice to Mr. Irish advising, "Based on recent circumstances, this is to serve as a notice that you are not allowed to enter onto Concord Hopsital property unless you require emergency services. Should you come onto Concord Hospital property for any other reason, you will be charged with criminal trespass."
The notice was signed by John Sharon, Director of Concord Hospital Security.
The Intel Hub reports that the FBI with bomb-sniffer dogs were at the peaceful protest.
"That’s right, the FBI, with no threat or sign of danger, sent bomb sniffing dogs to the protest. The FBI sent a clear message. People that stand up for the rights of American citizens are now possible terrorists. This Nazi like tactic has been used hundreds of times. The goal is to get the local media to connect the protest to a bomb threat in order to scare citizens who would normally support the parents into keeping their mouths shut.
"The government has taken their tyranny to new heights. DHS is now openly admitting that the Southern Poverty Law Center works for hand in hand with their department. DHS officials in Pennsylvania have hired Israeli agents to spy on law abiding citizens. We now live in a country where you are considered a potential terrorist if you stand up for your god given rights outlined by the Constitution. These globalists will steal your kids, track your family, and poison your water with little to no regret." (The Intel Hub)
I don’t suppose you have a more credible source for this? It sounds extremely fishy to me.
Couple: State took our baby: Libertarians turn out for protest
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/219670/couple-state-took-our-baby
Bomb-Sniffing Dogs Check Hospital During Protest: Demonstrators Protest After DCYF Seizes Newborn
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r/25332217/detail.html
You’ve neglected to mention that this creep is a convicted batterer who’s failed to complete his court ordered counseling, and that two other children were removed from this household prior to the delivery of this child. I doubt that anyone cares if he’s an oathkeeper, only that he’s a danger to those around him.
Were you under the impression that I am the author of these columns? You’ve been a FReeper too long to believe that.
I think there is a lot of propaganda by omission in this whole thing. It’s not what we know, but what we don’t know that matters. Too many people jumping to conclusions based on these sloppy news releases that appear to be slanted..
That's not what's happening here. There was a thread yesterday that had a copy of what Mr Irish claimed were the charges. The Oath Keepers charge was number 7 and looked different than the other 6. The typeface was different and I can't find that thread.
They shouldn’t be allowed use Oathkeeper affiliation to justify their actions.
They aren’t the alleged victim, the abuser, is claiming his membership with the oathkeepers is the reason. The state on the other hand says he’s a convicted abuser, hasn’t completed his court ordered counseling, and has removed the child from the the parents for it’s own safety, as it has already removed two other children from the parents.
The same situation may arise with a Freeper, it's likely just a matter of time.
Dissent is their target, and to liberals the end always justifies the means.
I would agree with you, except that the only association being touted with the oathkeepers, is coming from the alleged oathkeeper himself. That’s it, no one else has brought it up. It’s solely his charge, and solely his fault that it’s getting press.
The one he produced with a 7th point in a different type face, yes. Catching on here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.