RECOMMENDATIONS: FLORIDA’S AMENDMENTS 4, 5, 6

FactReal ^ | 10/28/2010 | FactReal

[FactReal]

FINANCING RADICAL LEFTISTS ARE BEHIND THE PROPONENTS OF AMENDMENTS 4, 5, 6...public records here:
- Radical leftist George Soros, unions, and trial lawyers financing proponents of Amendments 5 and 6
- Big Democrat donor financing proponents of Amendment 4

AMENDMENT 4 (Source)

FLORIDA TAXWATCH RECOMMENDS VOTING NO ON AMENDMENT 4

ANALYSIS: Amendment 4 would undoubtedly require additional elections. The state’s Financial Impact Estimating Conference (FIEC), which is required by law to develop an economic impact statement on amendments brought to the ballot by citizen initiative, says that how many elections would result is unknown but elections are expensive. [...]

Amendment 4’s envisioned restructuring of property rights from private to public and the associated change in decision-making from the marketplace to the ballot box will likely have devastating, lasting effects on Florida’s economy, the taxpayers, and the treasuries of cities and counties throughout or state... Recommendation: Floridians should vote NO on Amendment 4.

THE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE RECOMMENDS VOTING NO ON AMENDMENT 4

ANALYSIS: Opponents say that Amendment 4 will cost jobs and hurt Florida’s economy by stifling growth, thereby costing taxpayers millions of dollars...However, by far the most persuasive argument against Amendment 4 may be the experience of St. Petersburg Beach, where a local version this measure has been blamed for causing higher taxes, a loss of jobs, and endless litigation.

The evidence against Amendment 4 is overwhelming. Currently, more than 334 organizations, associations, ...Because of the detrimental impacts this amendment would have on Florida’s economy and on citizens’ property rights... Recommendation: NO on Amendment 4.


AMENDMENTS 5 AND 6

>> MORE HERE

[MindBender26]

4, 5, and 6 :

Obama's friends' tricks.

[sjmjax]

I intend to vote no on 4, 5, & 6.

Unfortunately, Floridians seem to have a history of voting in favor of all ballot initiatives regardless of their consequences or cost.

I hope more are paying attention this time around.

[clintonh8r]

Am I correct that these amendments need a 60% majority to pass? If so, I don’t think they have a chance with an expected strong Rep turnout. I already voted NO on all 3.

[Mountain Troll]

A number of people I know intend to vote yes on 4, due to grudges against their county and city governments. Spite isn’t a wise basis for voting, but pissing off the voters isn’t smart either.

[haywoodwebb]

I knew to vote no on 4 but hadn't had a chance to research 5 & 6 yet. That was on my weekend to-do list.

THEN . . .

I received a robo-call from Julian Bond yesterday telling me to vote YES on 5 & 6.

Thanks Julian! You saved me some research time . . .

NO on 4, 5 & 6!

Still not sure why they had me on their call list . . . I am registered Republican at this time . . . They must have me on a "Black" list somewhere . . .

;-)

[dennisw]

btt