Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Justice Dept. Denies Military Vote, Blames GOP
Publius Forum ^ | 10/30/10 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 10/30/2010 11:27:35 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

The head of the Obama Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, admitted this week that he has no real intention of trying to assure that members of our military are afforded their right to vote, and will not attempt in a timely fashion to enforce the MOVE Act (Military and Overseas Voter Empower Act) intended to make sure that our soldiers get their ballots with time enough to return them so that they can be counted on election day.

Perez made a very weak pledge that the Dept. of Justice would, “continue to vigilantly enforce [the] law” to make sure the military votes are counted, but he made it clear that all he is prepared to do is sue states long after the November 2 elections are over. In other words, Perez is saying that the DOJ will sue states after the election, long after the votes go uncounted and our soldier’s votes are essentially taken away from them.

It is a typical, Democrat bait-and-switch operation. Perez is putting on airs, acting as if he’s is seriously trying to enforce the law, but his actions will come too late, hitting after that “enforcement” will do any good at all....

Publiusforum.com...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; doj; electionfraud; military; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Mobile Vulgus

If you want people to read what you have written, it is a good idea to show that you know what you are doing.


21 posted on 10/31/2010 1:29:18 PM PDT by listenhillary (A very simple fix to our dilemma - We need to reward the makers instead of the takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Why, without them how else would we EVER know when anything is the truth?

Easy.

Ask yourself: Is it written on a blog? Probably not true. Look for confirmation.

Then look and see if the "article" is posted in full.
If not, the "writer" is NOT looking to share information,
he is looking to get blog hits. Dismiss these sorts of "articles"
as absolute garbage and mock the "writer". It's easy to understand.

22 posted on 10/31/2010 1:34:44 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I wouldn’t count on it with Holder heading up the DOJ.


23 posted on 11/01/2010 10:42:42 AM PDT by Todd Kinsey (Todd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson