Posted on 11/22/2010 11:01:13 PM PST by onyx
Mike Huckabee, who knows a thing or two about insurgent campaigns, sees the power of the Palin candidacy. Taegan Goddard links this morning to the Des Moines Register:
Mike Huckabee told the Des Moines Register that Sarah Palin would be a strong contender for president should she decide to run.
Said Huckabee: No question, she will be a very, very strong presence and force, if she gets in. You know, she may run away with it. And thats one of those things everyone needs to be prepared for.
Huckabees words are more than an observation. They are a warning. And they are a warning especially to be heeded because they come from the one politician who can probably do most to stop Palin, the candidate best positioned to win Iowa.
Huckabee himself is also persona non grata with party leaders, because of his repeated criticism of Wall Street and Wall Street minded GOP insiders.
But Huckabee is a very different cat from Sarah Palin. Hes smart and policy-minded. And while he expresses a strong social conservative message, he does not play the politics of division, disparagement, and resentment in which Palin specializes.
In the days of party conventions, the answer to the Palin problem would have been obvious: party leaders would assemble and force the mutually mistrustful Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee onto the same ticket.
In modern times, the game is played differently, but the structure of the situation remains the same: an early Huckabee pact with a candidate acceptable to Republican donors (if not Romney, then Tim Pawlenty or even Jeb Bush) would command enough clout to push Palin off the stage.
If not, all bets are off. As I think about it, thats one of the big problems with the candidacies of a Thune, a Daniels or a Barbour: They will need Huckabee as much or more than Romney does.
Yet Huckabee is also a re-elected governor, plus he won the second largest haul of delegates last time. Why should he defer to any of the lower-polling governors? And who will make him?
But if the evangelicals vote for him in droves like they did last time, he can change the overall outcome again. Hopefully they will actually look at his positions instead of just blindly supporting him because he’s a minister.
Years ago, I used to respect Ex- Gov. Huckabee and writer/editor David Frum. But, they both have turned out to be statists, supporting abortion (at times) and echoing a lot of the left’s ideology. I no longer see either of them as conservatives. Both are total disappointments.
With all due respect to Mr. Huckabee, who seems like a very nice guy, affable if you will, (see Kevin Costner’s Wyatt Earp)I do not think America elects a Huckabee president....I just don’t see it at this time....
We don’t need affable as much as we needs BALLS
With all due respect to Mr. Huckabee, who seems like a very nice guy, affable if you will, (see Kevin Costner’s Wyatt Earp)I do not think America elects a Huckabee president....I just don’t see it at this time....
We don’t need affable as much as we need BALLS....right now we need a sheriff...
Oh good grief. Is that crazy preacher against her? I can’t recall his name?
Right. I agree with that.
That’s my thinking , also. If Huckaboob is Frum’s candidate, he’s in trouble with Tea Party patriots.
He can’t shake romneycare and Huckaboob can’t shake all those pardons or his regained weight....lol.
PAY ATTENTION here, folks...we have got to stop allowing the DEMOCRATS of NH to pick the GOP nominee...CLOSE or move the damn NH primary, and do it before 2012.
I think the efforts of many on the internet, with FR playing no small role, have educated many believing Christians as to the dangers of overweening governance.
A big government social conservative such as Huckabee will find himself practically relegated to retirees for supporters. This is in the Protestant realm of voters who predicate support upon sharing religious views on political and social matters.
Then, we have a similar phenomenon among Catholics (Newt appears to me to have been scheming to jump on that bandwagon for years, counting his amnesty chickens before they hatched, imho) and Mitt Romney with Mormons.
They’ll have been divided and scattered, hopefully leading to the fiscal and social conservative candidate with something of a western-tinged libertarian streak that we all know has worked successfully for conservatives working to regain the White House in the past.
One potential candidate in this mold would be Sarah Palin. Others would be ... ?
LOL. Right.
There’s nothing wrong with the primary calendar. We fudged around with it once and look what happened.
RINOs pushing RINOs. Not surprised.
...the Huckster is just doing the obligatory pre-strike.Can’t let an opponent get an early lead.....
He has to wait to see where the money is, who’s got what, and who’s willing to send some his way, before he’ll commit. He’ll run to get before the public, to sell few books, play a set or two with a local band.....but to be President? That is not in the cards for him.
The Hukster will not get my vote any more than Romney - wont do it - Those idiot Republicans need to put someone up that is a true conservative. I would vote for Sarah and would conceivably vote for someone else but those two losers will NOT get a vote from me.
You are dead wrong. NH is one of the main reasons Barack Obama is in the White House. They provided the momentum for McCain's DOA Presidential campaign. It is a deliberate strategy of the NH Democrat party to crossover to the GOP primary to vote for what they perceive to be the weakest presidential candidate. There is a reason Palin's book tours avoids New England like the plague. If Palin runs; NH will do everything in their power to abort her campaign before it can gain any momentum...
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off .hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Kathleen Parker: After Interviews, Palin Should Bow Out"
Staggering bigotry of Kathleen Parker - UPDATED"
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
You’re talking about an issue that’s up to the people of NH.
Right, no Huckabee, no squishy-wishy-washy on issues. Too much to do. Complete dismantlement of several unconstitutional government agencies and departments. No nonsense, no messing around. President Palin will have no ties to Washington, D.C. and in fact, she’s hostile to the way OUR business is conducted and to the fossil incumbents and the old boys club. 2012 will be all about restoring our Republic with clear cut Constitutional government and SCOTUS appointments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.