Posted on 12/31/2010 3:34:20 AM PST by RobinMasters
Video: Jeff Kuhner of the Washington Times: People around the White House and in democratic circles including senior top editors afraid to pursue Obama's Eligibility and records concealment.
Kuhner says the Media's abdicating their responsibility to pursue the truth and hold our politicians accountable. Kuhner goes on to say that All know there is something there, saying "where there's smoke, there's fire," and says the Controversy is gaining traction and momentum. This is an excellent interview with Jeff Kuhner.
Via MrTimotheus85; Steve Malzberg Interviews Jeff Kuhner - If The Truth Got Out About Obama There Would Be A Civil War.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Tribal /customary marriages versus statutory marriages are a problem....
They are a problem today..and were a problem then.
You didn’t need to register a marriage for it to be legal.
The marriage in Hawaii would not have been legal in Kenya and it was not legal in Hawaii.
The marriage in Hawaii did not meet the requirements to be legal at the time in either location.
This article shows the problems that the Brits face.
http://www.olir.it/areetematiche/104/documents/Sona_Polygamy_in_Britain.pdf
Interestingly enough, the problems are starting to come to the forefront again because of the Muslims. You have Muslims trying to get tax payer dollars for their second and third wives. They have succeeded in some cases. It is causing an uproar.
The one thing that a lot of people miss out on is the convenience of the birth date and statutory rape.
Has anyone calculated when she conceived by the obstetrics method. My guess is it was a Miracle..just after she turned 18.
However, what if little Barry wasn’t really born on that day but they had to say so because of rape issues?
I think Marriage after a certain age took care of that problem.
That could be a reason for this whole concocted mess.
Barry is born on a date that would have created a statutory rape issue. Obama may or may not be the father. he agrees to marry her to make the problem go away.
Just one possibility under the umbrella of what could have happened.
Or maybe the Bay of Pigs Exile is right and Obama’s mother was pregnant when she left Cuba..again the birth was before the “official story”.
It looks like someone figured the conception date.
However, I think Hawaii’s rape age may be lower than 17
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2016211/posts
“The one thing that a lot of people miss out on is the convenience of the birth date and statutory rape.”
Maybe Obama was born *somewhere* before HI became a state. Look at his pictures, he sure was a BIG boy in his class pictures........
" According to the California Lawyer transcript, Scalia said he knows there still are people mad over the court's 2000 decision in Bush v. Gore that ended the Florida recount controversy in that year's president election, installing Bush in the White House."I've been impressed that even when we come out with opinions that are highly unpopular or even … what should I say … emotion raising, the people accept them, as they should. The one that comes most to mind is the election case of Bush v. Gore. Nobody on the court liked to wade into that controversy. But there was certainly no way that we could turn down the petition for certiorari. What are you going to say? The case isn't important enough? And I think that the public ultimately realized that we had to take the case. ... I was very, very proud of the way the court's reputation survived that, even though there are a lot of people who are probably still mad about it."
He said that his perspective on the Constitution – that it continues to mean today what it meant when written and is not evolving – is the only logical position to taek.
"In its most important aspects, the Constitution tells the current society that it cannot do [whatever] it wants to do. It is a decision that the society has made that in order to take certain actions, you need the extraordinary effort that it takes to amend the Constitution. Now if you give to those many provisions of the Constitution that are necessarily broad – such as due process of law, cruel and unusual punishments, equal protection of the laws – if you give them an evolving meaning so that they have whatever meaning the current society thinks they ought to have, they are no limitation on the current society at all," he said. "
From: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=247597
Is the question of Barry's eligibility NOT important? Can someone who was born owing foreign allegiance be considered a Natural Born Citizen as intended by the framers? Let alone, someone who hasn't proven they were born here?
It appears they are STILL reeling from that case in 2000.
That is truly comforting to read.
Coraggio, Judge!
#224 !
I hope they are "still reeling" from the way BO dissed them at the last State of the Union address. Hear the case, SCOTUS. Please, just hear it.
bump
Amen. Courage, Justice Scalia.
May God bless and protect him.
Am I the only one who thinks Michelle’s Mama looks a lot like Valerie Jarrett?
AS of tomorrow.....John BOehner will be Speaker of the House. The SCOTUS has two cases waiting for them....WE ALL need to pray hard for truth to come forward ASAP...but just at the right time so the DNC cannot organize for the next election.
Thanks STARWISE.
The sooner the better.
I really cannot imagine a Republican with the Intestinal fortitude to question Obama...
Change to: I really cannot imagine a Republican with the “TESTICULAR” fortitude to question Obama...
(There, fixed it for ya)
Keep “PINGING” me. I do appreciate it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.