GOProud Party Breitbart’s Proudest Hour

PajamasMedia ^ | February 10, 2011 | Roger L Simon

[backwoods-engineer]

And no, I am not gay, but am sick of seeing people like Breitbart trashed. Someone who I agree with on probably 80% of things is not my 20% enemy.

That's what I've been trying to say, and apparently, we both are wasting our breath. Doesn't matter; the 100%ers will probably stay home no matter what, pounding on their keyboards against the libertarians or the gays or whoever they want to blame everything on; everyone except where the real blame belongs: an out-of-control federal government and the sheep they control.

[backwoods-engineer]

An ally does not try to force you to accept something that every fiber of your being screams is wrong.

Has Brietbart done this? Come on. Give the hyperbole a rest.

[DJ MacWoW]

Barry repealed DADT. They’re going to vote AGAINST him?! No.

[DJ MacWoW]

we both are wasting our breath.

Yes. You are. Homosexuals can vote anyway they want to. They only need an identity group in order to push their agenda. Identity politics is a leftist trick.

Barry repealed DADT. Tell me they'll vote against him.

[backwoods-engineer]

Homosexuals can vote anyway they want to. They only need an identity group in order to push their agenda. Identity politics is a leftist trick. Nobody's defending homosexuals or their "tricks" here, DJ. My original comments about knowing our (that is, we conservatives') allies were about Brietbart (who hasn't said he's homo) and libertarians.

But whatever. Go ahead, back-stab all the other groups who want smaller government. Just makes more work for all of us.

[backwoods-engineer]

Exactly how does that beat barry in 2012?

It doesn't. And with attitudes like I've seen here on this thread today, we won't.

[DJ MacWoW]

Breitbart lives on the west coast. I don't actually expect him to be conservative. What I DON'T expect is for him to actively cause schisms in a Conservative organization. And Coulter is doing the same. These people become famous and seem to lose their moral compass. Homosexuality is a dysfunctional, deviant sexual behavior that is not to be accepted as normal.

To the mentally healthy (heterosexual) sex is something you do;
To the mentally diseased ('homosexual') sex is everything you are.

[backwoods-engineer]

If one has no problem with then homosexual agenda as like him then he is for having fisting being taught in schools. Yes Jennings has taught fisting in schools Homosexuals want their version of sex taught in schools and yes it does go on in places like MA Being fiscal conservative but socially liberal is hardly conservative is it. So the question is do you think the homosexual agenda of don't ask, marriage, getting kids, being taught in schools etc is conservative? A simple yes or no will suffice

No. And you need to learn to stay on topic.

We aren't discussing Jennings, fisting, MA, DADT, or any of the other things you've thrown in my face, including calling me a homosexual.

We are discussing how Brietbart and libertarians can be our allies in the cause of smaller and more constitutional government, and how people like you can't see that.

[DJ MacWoW]

You and the other poster seem to think we NEED 2% or less of the population that are sexual deviants in order to beat Obama. Again, he repealed DADT. Tell me they will vote against him.

[DJ MacWoW]

You think you’ll win with libertarians? Um, ok.

[backwoods-engineer]

You and the other poster seem to think we NEED 2% or less of the population that are sexual deviants in order to beat Obama. Again, he repealed DADT. Tell me they will vote against him.

For the 18th time, my post (and Glock's I think) were about BRIETBART! I was also thinking about libertarians as allies.

Please get this through your thick head: we aren't defending gays! Sheesh!

[backwoods-engineer]

And Coulter is doing the same. These people become famous and seem to lose their moral compass. Homosexuality is a dysfunctional, deviant sexual behavior that is not to be accepted as normal.

Both these points are correct.

But if Brietbart comes out tomorrow with a story on BigGovernment.com about some underhanded voter corruption program, isn't that a good thing? Then, even if Brietbart's personal moral compass is screwed up, if he works toward smaller government, isn't he helping us, too?

That's all I'm really saying here. You want me to be saying so much more than that, that I support the gay agenda, yadda, yadda, yadda. Well I don't and I'm not.

[cizinec]

Your push to make it seem as if we should keep our views behind closed doors and never seek federal legislation or Amendments while the leftists run wild is a poor stradegy.

Not so. My push is to have limited government, even when legislating what we agree is moral behavior. You and someone else may work together to get this marriage amendment passed, "for the good morals of the country," only to find that this someone else worked with the homos to force you to buy an electric car "for the good morals of the country."

My strategy is limited government, plain and simple. That includes education, which is where we are *really* losing this battle. So long as we focus on the symptom (gay marriage) and not the cause (liberal control of the education system) we are going to lose.

[DJ MacWoW]

Please get this through your thick head:

When did I ever say such a thing to you?

[GlockThe Vote]

Exactly. I really don’t know who the 100 percent club thinks is going to beat obama that meets their purity test.

[bmwcyle]

It is a sad day when evil plants itself inside your home.

[manc]

no that is the problem with you , you cannot seem to understand that allowing homosexual groups into CPAC is allowing the homosexuals cause,

FHS can’t you read their manifesto, it’s all about homosexual rights

no libertarians are socially liberal, joining with them and having them tell conservatives what we should accept os pure crap

BTW, Why are you so keen on defending AB,?
I mean you read a post about him which you d not agree and now you are on here all day and yesterday saying how we should accept them ,

well guess what , most of us are not in the conservative circle but if you want then by all means go ahead you join with them but you are in a minority as this thread shows

[manc]

LOL
Two posters on a thread with conservatives pretending that they should be telling us what conservatives must accept

priceless.

reminds me of the rude paul voters, hardly any of them but they try and make out they are the majority

[manc]

you call the poster thick, and yet you defend AB which is defending homo’s

think about that and no I’m not interested in carbon emissions by Sarah, hope you’re off your drugs by now

[DJ MacWoW]

And both of them newer signups. Yeah. I'll listen to them.

Libertarians are referred to as liberaltarians on FR for a reason.