Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weapon of Mis-Instruction: 60s Radical “Historian” Justifies Giving Stalin the A-Bomb
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | February 21, 2011 | David Forsmark

Posted on 02/21/2011 4:37:30 PM PST by Walter Scott Hudson

It was a blast from the past this week, as mostly forgotten one-time Life cover boy, radical historian and Yale Professor turned community organizer Staughton Lynd surfaced to add… nothing, to the subject of the Rosenbergs and the atomic bomb spy plot.

His article in the Marxist rag, Monthly Review (who knew that still existed, either) was ironically titled, “Is There Anything More to Say about the Rosenberg Case?”

I’m willing to say there might be—but Lynd sure didn’t prove it.

But he did find some novel ways to say nothing new about the case while exposing the moral idiocy of the hard Left, proposing that:

Early in the article, Lynd grouses: “Those who have all along argued that the Rosenbergs were guilty feel triumphant. It seems to them that they have been proved correct. The case, they propose, is closed.”

Yep. We sure do.

Lynd then proceeds to construct the notion that the Left was really right, even though they were wrong, about the Rosenbergs. You see, it’s not fair to use the Venona transcripts to declare the Rosenberg case over, because the Left didn’t know about them in the 1950s...

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS: History; Politics
KEYWORDS: coldwar; nuclear; stalin

1 posted on 02/21/2011 4:37:37 PM PST by Walter Scott Hudson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

When Lefties speak I laugh out loud because of the twisting of logic they get into to prove their inane ideas.

Unfortunately, other Lefties see how beautiful the logic and reasoning is and they fall in line.

Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.


2 posted on 02/21/2011 4:42:31 PM PST by jongaltsr (It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

The left and treason: now they feel they can admit what they previously denied. They knew that that Hiss, Fuchs, the Greenglasses, and the Rosenbergs were traitors.


3 posted on 02/21/2011 4:44:23 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walter Scott Hudson
Just proves that nothing good comes from Chicago
4 posted on 02/21/2011 4:45:13 PM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Yet in fact it was not treason for the folks you name.
One cannot commit treason against a foreign power.


5 posted on 02/21/2011 5:04:15 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Walter Scott Hudson
Interestingly, I personally think that the Soviet Union would have gotten the atomic bomb anyway even without the espionage Klaus Fuchs did in the early to mid 1940's.

Remember, the Russians had two superb nuclear physicists in Igor Kurchatov and Andrei Sakharov, and even without Fuchs' knowledge they would have figured out and built the U-235 "gunbarrel" bomb and the Pu-239 implosion bomb by 1953. (It's only now after the Cold War ended that the West found a huge treasure trove of basic scientific research papers from the Soviet Academy of Sciences that was just as advanced as anything in the West.)

6 posted on 02/21/2011 6:03:19 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
I agree with you that eventually they would have gotten "the bomb." Once they knew it could be done, they would have pursued it vigorously. The only question is how much time (and effort/money) the spies saved them. I believe the spies saved them "several" years. How many? Five maybe? No one can be sure.

I recall that back in the '50s the Soviets specified Western (and often US) vacuum tubes in their military airborne radars. Being able to buy the tubes on the open market saved them a lot of development work, and especially time. Saving time by obtaining nuclear data through espionage would fit right in with their regular practices.

7 posted on 02/21/2011 7:36:59 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

What are you talking about? Hiss was a US citizen, the Rosenbergs were US citizens, and the Greenglasses were US citizens. Only Fuchs, of those I named, wasn’t a natural born US citizen. Fuchs was a German who was a naturalized Brit.

Hope that clears it up.


8 posted on 02/21/2011 9:19:04 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I have read they they had an alternate design that was abandoned in favor of US designs that were certain to work. Simulation later proved that the alternate design would have also worked. I would not discount Russian technological prowess, especially then, and consider that many of those scientists were literally working to save their own lives as well as the lives of their families.

The spies may have shaved a few years of of the inevitable. Still, I’m glad they got the hot squat.


9 posted on 02/21/2011 9:35:04 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

I am sure it did, at least to your satisfaction, Chum.


10 posted on 02/23/2011 6:05:18 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

The citizenship of the people involved is an easily established matter of fact. Hiss, the Rosenbergs, and the Greenglasses committed treason against the US because they were born here. Fuchs was guilty of espionage here and was convicted and imprisoned in Britain. Got it, Chum?


11 posted on 02/23/2011 8:56:53 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson