Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interior Secretary Says White House Opposes Drilling in Arctic Because It Will Not Lead...
CNSNews ^ | March 4, 2011 | Nicholas Ballasy

Posted on 03/04/2011 1:27:37 PM PST by jazusamo

Complete title: Interior Secretary Says White House Opposes Drilling in Arctic Because It Will Not Lead to Energy Independence

VIDEO 2:09 minutes

(CNSNews.com) - When asked why the Obama administration opposes drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) given the rising cost of gasoline, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told CNSNews.com that the “drill, baby, drill program” is not going to lead the United States to energy independence.

“We don’t believe that you need to drill everywhere and we don’t believe that the 'drill, baby, drill' program is the way that’s going to get us to the energy independence that we need for America or that will power our economy and that’s why the President has been so clear from day one and we in the Department of Interior have been so clear that what we need to do is need to have a robust energy program that includes a number of different sources of energy and while yes, we are pushing forward with oil and gas development both offshore and onshore which was the subject of much of the hearing today, we’re also moving forward with renewable energy,” he told CNSNews.com after testifying before the House Natural Resources Committee about his Department’s FY2012 budget.

“The President has said we are supporting nuclear, we’re support other clean air energy forms and at the end of the day, this is a place where there is hope that perhaps some of the Republicans in the House would come together and say that we can move forward with energy legislation that moves us into this new energy future.”

Salazar was also asked what the White House is saying about drilling in the Gulf.

“What I say is what the White House would say and that is that we are moving forward with an effort to stand up oil and gas drilling in the deep oceans of the gulf and are doing it in a safe and orderly way and that’s reflected in the budget request that we were defending for the President today,” he said.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 7dollargas; alaska; anwr; bhofascism; democrats; drillheredrillnow; drilling; economy; energy; gasprices; liberalfascism; liberals; obama; oil; progressives; salazar; socialistdemocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
Obama and his idiots are determined to destroy our economy.
1 posted on 03/04/2011 1:27:40 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
But they evidently believe importing more oil will.

But it's not about energy, anyway.

It's about punishing America for it's past success, and making sure it can never happen again.

2 posted on 03/04/2011 1:29:37 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
More playing with words from the community-organizer-in-chief.
3 posted on 03/04/2011 1:29:46 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
<"The President has said we are supporting nuclear,"

Actions speak louder than words. How many nuclear plants has Obama approved? And one of the first things he tried was to shut down the nuclear waste storage sites.

4 posted on 03/04/2011 1:30:26 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Then I suppose “Don’t drill, baby” gets us to energy independence?

One regular argument of the dishonest is “but that won’t solve the entire problem—so we can’t do it.” In fact, the speaker usually has no desire to solve the problem at all and loathes the idea of solving even a part of it.


5 posted on 03/04/2011 1:30:57 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The sooner this guy goes, the better.

I think the Republicans need to run a congressional investigation into the Gulf oil spill.

Among other things, they might inquire how Salazar gets away with defying a federal judge repeatedly.

Or they might ask him why the only company Salazar has given permission to open a new well in the Gulf is jointly owned by none other than BP.


6 posted on 03/04/2011 1:31:55 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Of course, none of the weather-dependent “green technologies” will lead us to energy independence either but that doesn’t stop the Marxist regime from pushing it. Domestic drilling would at least bring the price down of a vital commodity while all these green initiatives seem to all come with major pricetags.


7 posted on 03/04/2011 1:32:12 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thank you Mr. Obama for your lack of energy policy and lack of energy sense.


8 posted on 03/04/2011 1:32:58 PM PST by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Why work, I'll never earn enough money to pay my bills and feed my self.

Why drill for oil when we can never be self sufficient.

Bot statements are based in liberalism.

And 100% inaccurate.

9 posted on 03/04/2011 1:34:11 PM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

These anti-American environazis and liberals have been saying this since the 1970’s. If we had started then, we would be on our way now.


10 posted on 03/04/2011 1:34:58 PM PST by rlmorel (How to relate to Liberals? Take a Conservative, remove all responsibility...logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Renewable” energy = NO energy

And that’s exactly what they want.


11 posted on 03/04/2011 1:36:37 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Yep, Zer0 says lots of things but it doesn’t mean they’re true. His thug Dingy Harry can’t shut down the multi-billion dollar NV storage site fast enough.


12 posted on 03/04/2011 1:36:41 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

DRILL NOW!! DRILL OFTEN!!


13 posted on 03/04/2011 1:36:47 PM PST by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

20 more nuclear power plants online would really help quite a bit as well...


14 posted on 03/04/2011 1:37:39 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A rising tide floats all boats and the only drilling these idiots want to do is through the hull of our own boat.


15 posted on 03/04/2011 1:38:14 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
"Actions speak louder than words. How many nuclear plants has Obama approved?"

South Texas just got approved for two more nuclear reactors.

16 posted on 03/04/2011 1:39:12 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: avacado; DannyTN

Will they actually be built, or will the greenies picket and get the approval yanked?
Beleive it when the reactors are built and have reached first critical.


17 posted on 03/04/2011 1:41:58 PM PST by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Even if you drill in Alaska it will not change the amount of oil imported, lowest shipping cost is the shortest point from supply to market. There are several oil shipping charts on the web.


18 posted on 03/04/2011 1:43:03 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Therein lies the problem, environazis. They’ve set us back in every type energy compared to the rest of the world. The turkeys are even going after proposed wind and solar energy fields now because of damage to environment and/or animals, reptiles and birds.


19 posted on 03/04/2011 1:43:43 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“drill, baby, drill program” is not going to lead the United States to energy independence.

Does everyone here believe that if we open this that once and for all we will not accept any oil from the Middle East? If this is the case than I would say lets do it NOW. What does this guy know that we don’t?


20 posted on 03/04/2011 1:44:43 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Even if you drill in Alaska it will not change the amount of oil imported, lowest shipping cost is the shortest point from supply to market. There are several oil shipping charts on the web.

Oil is a fungible commodity.

An increase in global supply brings a decrease in price.

21 posted on 03/04/2011 1:46:35 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

no adult cares what these assholes think.....Drill in Alaska.


22 posted on 03/04/2011 1:46:57 PM PST by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

no adult cares what these assholes think.....Drill in Alaska. this president is a complete asshole


23 posted on 03/04/2011 1:47:45 PM PST by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

20 more nuclear power plants online would really help quite a bit as well...

It sorta sucks that we had three parts of the government for a few years and this stuff was never passed. What a let down. We could have done so much with having the majority of everything.


24 posted on 03/04/2011 1:47:56 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

It takes over 5 years to get a Nuclear plant built, even with all the red tape out of the way.


25 posted on 03/04/2011 1:48:08 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

When they say “energy independence” I think what they mean is “independence from energy.”


26 posted on 03/04/2011 1:49:06 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (Irritating a libtard is fun, and requires very little imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
You couldn't be more correct!!!
27 posted on 03/04/2011 1:49:27 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; DannyTN

The South Texas Project already has nuclear reactors. They’re just adding two more. It’s a done deal as far as permits. The eco-freaks will feel real lonely protesting out near Bay City, Texas.


28 posted on 03/04/2011 1:50:06 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Yes.
I fully expect them to not be built at all.


29 posted on 03/04/2011 1:51:45 PM PST by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
"It sorta sucks that we had three parts of the government for a few years and this stuff was never passed. What a let down. We could have done so much with having the majority of everything."

It's a mistake to think that the Pubbies have the best interests of America at heart. They don't.

The sole purpose of the Republican Party is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party.

30 posted on 03/04/2011 1:53:24 PM PST by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
we don’t believe that the 'drill, baby, drill' program is the way that’s going to get us to the energy independence that we need for America

So it's not better to light one candle than to curse the darkness?

31 posted on 03/04/2011 1:53:49 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (Obamacare: Not just dreck. Unconstitutional dreck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado; DannyTN

Adding two more.
Which have to be built.
Expect the reenies to freak out and the reactors to not be built at all.
Permits mean nothing when it comes to that.
And as we’ve seen in Wisconsin, they can bus in a sizable number of rent-a-protestors.
Just keep your eyes peeled.


32 posted on 03/04/2011 1:53:49 PM PST by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Insanity.


33 posted on 03/04/2011 1:54:00 PM PST by denydenydeny (Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak-Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

34 posted on 03/04/2011 1:55:18 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

More like light a candle, curse the glare in their minds.


35 posted on 03/04/2011 1:56:24 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All

The obama administration going to sink with rising gas prices and this attitude....book it....


36 posted on 03/04/2011 1:57:00 PM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

37 posted on 03/04/2011 1:58:17 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Really, then when are those four thousand wells punched in ND the past couple of years going to reduce price. I grew up on a farm and live on one I know bs when is see it.


38 posted on 03/04/2011 1:59:40 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Right on, IM!


39 posted on 03/04/2011 2:01:59 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

They’ll be built with no problem.


40 posted on 03/04/2011 2:03:20 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Really, then when are those four thousand wells punched in ND the past couple of years going to reduce price.

Exactly what price should oil be? And, while we're at it, what temperature is the earth supposed to be.

Had those four thousand wells not been punched, the price would be higher than it is.

It works like this:


41 posted on 03/04/2011 2:03:34 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Their “feel good” “greenism” just can’t trump the fact that people hate high gas prices more than they like feeling good about themselves for “saving the erf”.


42 posted on 03/04/2011 2:03:55 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What do you mean, “the law of supply and demand”?

WE write the laws around HERE!


43 posted on 03/04/2011 2:04:58 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Roflol


44 posted on 03/04/2011 2:06:03 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; jazusamo

Drilling in Alaska, and offshore California, and offshore Louisiana, puts royalties and tax money into American tax bases. It pays wages to American workers, pays profits to American contractors and investors, instead of paying taxes and royalties to some other country’s treasury and putting some other country’s people to work.


45 posted on 03/04/2011 2:12:44 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If we had been drilling for all the years Democrats and environmentalists blocked drilling, there would be plenty of oil right now, and we could easily be energy independent, with oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and even costly wind farms. Democrats are liars.


46 posted on 03/04/2011 2:19:04 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado
"South Texas just got approved for two more nuclear reactors."

That's good news. Considering that the application has only been pending since 2007. It only took 3 years. Bush should have approved it, but I guess he only had 1 year to do it. Obama should have approved it 2 years ago.

But maybe this means they will start moving on all the other pending applications.

47 posted on 03/04/2011 2:22:01 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB; jazusamo

Right, Mr. B. for the last 10-20 years, we should have been busting our butts developing pebble bed technology and selling it.

Now, we will be lucky to heat our homes and turn on our lights.

The energy policy impediments of the Left just makes me angry. They are illogical, self destructive and infantile.

If we don’t do something soon (and it may already be too late) we are going to find ourselves in a spiral down in a vicious circle caused by the collapse of industry and the economy, exacerbated by the lack of usable energy at ANY price.

Our own government in power is setting us up to fail. It is my opinion it is not unintentional.


48 posted on 03/04/2011 2:30:51 PM PST by rlmorel (How to relate to Liberals? Take a Conservative, remove all responsibility...logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Were is that article informing the USA that if drilling occurred within ANWR and offshore of Alaska. Alaska itself would become the worlds 8th largest producer.

Okay no Alaska would not allow energy independence. Ken Salazaar, is no American, he is a Communist fascist Swine.

In American we need another Joe McCarthy. Yeah that one from WI eventually got a little power hungry, maybe the power struggle would balance out DC.


49 posted on 03/04/2011 2:41:17 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hondact200

I’ll vote for another Joe McCarthy, he was a great American.


50 posted on 03/04/2011 2:43:25 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson