Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only 9% believe Obama has documented eligibility
World Net Daily ^ | March 20, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/20/2011 8:55:53 PM PDT by blockhead51

Not even one person in 10 believes Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president of the United States, according to a stunning new scientific poll that also reveals political Independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue.

"The shocking result in this survey is that just 9 percent said they believe Obama has met the requirements to prove he was born in the United States and is therefore qualified to be president," said Fritz Wenzel, chief of Wenzel Strategies, which conducted the assessment.

"Even when you combine those who say such questions are not valid with those who believe he has satisfied the requirements, it still falls short of equaling the percentage who said he should step forward and prove his birth origin once and for all," he said.

Wenzel Strategies, an independent public opinion research firm based in Ohio, conducted a nationwide telephone poll using a randomly selected sample of all adults. The survey, including 1,095 respondents, was conducted March 15-17, 2011, and carries a confidence interval of 95 percent and a margin of error of +/- 2.93 percentage points.

Read more: Only 9% believe Obama has documented eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=276865#ixzz1HCaI0Lly

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: americainperil; birthcertificate; certifigate; chicagoresumefraud; harvardresumefraud; jihadinamerica; kaganresumefraud; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nobc; nodocumentation; nojustice; notransparency; notruth; noveritas; obamaresumefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: EternalVigilance

Has anyone ever photoshopped a pair of glasses on the one for a side by side?


41 posted on 03/20/2011 9:44:47 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. There are Wars and Rumors of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51
9 out of 10! We have the numbers, where the hell is the uprising? Why does Barry still occupy the White House?

Imagine what it is on FR. It must be somewhere around 98% with most of the < = 2% being of malcontents and Obama trolls like Jameeseeeee77777.

42 posted on 03/20/2011 9:47:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
There is no need to verify an admission of ineligibility

That's true. I was just giving my opinion as to how Obama may be thinking.

Need to get lawyers involved in this one. Sooner rather than later.

43 posted on 03/20/2011 9:47:48 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
There is no need to verify an admission of ineligibility. That’s just stupid.

Well, if you choose to begin your argument with the proposition that the eligibility issue should be resolved on the basis of what Obama tells you, don't be surprised if folks conclude that he is eligible.

The place to begin is the discovery of the real facts. Subpoena the birth records and proceed from there. Maybe the actual birth certificate states that his father is Malcolm X. Who knows, but why not begin by securing the original documents?

I have written to both Boehner and Issa asking them to subpoena those materials. It would be such a simple and such a sensible thing to do. If they don't and if the original documents aren't discovered, we're not going anywhere with this issue.

44 posted on 03/20/2011 9:50:19 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

That’s ridiculous.


45 posted on 03/20/2011 9:52:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

The sheep/serfs are easily manipulated by TV. Keep watching TV - because if you watch - you support the usurper.


46 posted on 03/20/2011 9:53:08 PM PDT by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Better source than Fox Al Waleed and the rest of TV is even worse.


47 posted on 03/20/2011 9:54:43 PM PDT by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

That is one freaky morph.


48 posted on 03/20/2011 9:55:34 PM PDT by Ackackadack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

So you prefer web polls, which are unscientific?

“Scientific poll” has a meaning. It says that the poll is a gauge of opinion, and is not self-selecting (like the online polls that get “freeped”).

I’m sorry you don’t understand that, sometimes, words mean things.

However - “stunning” is simply hyperbole, here. The Obama administration prefers the term “unexpected”.


49 posted on 03/20/2011 10:03:23 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
Anytine someone has to qualify their poll by calling it scientific, or stunning, I tune out.

Anytime someone has a poll, period, I tune out.

As far as I'm concerned, they're ALL made up. To anyone reading, have you ever been part of a national poll? Ever known anyone who has? With as many polls as there are on a weekly basis, you'd think after years, decades of these, that the odds would be that just once, if not you, then someone you know would say they'd been polled. But for me at least, that has NEVER happened. Anyone have anything different to report?

50 posted on 03/20/2011 10:03:49 PM PDT by Ackackadack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Can you imagine what the numbers would be if there was anybody besides the blogs reporting the real problems with Obama’s birth certificate and the supposed newspaper birth announcements?

What we are seeing is almost entirely the result of places like Free Republic and the blogs. WND has kept some of the questions visible but there’s a lot they just won’t report. Nobody will.


51 posted on 03/20/2011 10:22:48 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Yes, and it has taken almost 3 years to get this point.


52 posted on 03/20/2011 11:00:19 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ackackadack
I was polled once around 2002. They asked loaded questions like, “are you in favor of X even though it could hurt minorities...
I messed them up good.
53 posted on 03/21/2011 12:36:21 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“His daddy was a British subject. No further documentation needed.
He is ineligible to be President.”

That is the real point; is it not. Does not matter where he was born.


54 posted on 03/21/2011 1:38:13 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

That’s right. We don’t need no steenking documents. He already admitted his daddy was a British subject. Case closed!


55 posted on 03/21/2011 1:51:15 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ackackadack

“To anyone reading, have you ever been part of a national poll?”

Since most polls only have about 1,000 adults, your chances of being selected for any given poll are 1 in 250,000. Thus, even if there are 100 polls a year, your chances of being selected are still only 1 in 2500.


56 posted on 03/21/2011 3:47:28 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

It’s not Boehner and Issa’s job to subpoena Obama’s documents—it’s Obama’s job to release them. The Douche in Chief can simply authorize public release of the documents, or continue to watch his political capital evaporate as the American public dismiss him as a complete fraud.


57 posted on 03/21/2011 5:12:04 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

That would imply that Boehner and Issa each had a pair, which they don’t. I belive theirs’ were snipped as a condition of becomming Republicans (socialists). It’s actually a requirement I think....

The Big Boo


58 posted on 03/21/2011 5:51:41 AM PDT by The Big Boo (Lone Wolf M/C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Ms. Palin is hedging and hiding on it as is Bachmann. No Republican (socialist) will address it. This keeps them eligible for Presidential Ken Cen box seats. You have to know the priorities.

The Big Boo


59 posted on 03/21/2011 5:55:26 AM PDT by The Big Boo (Lone Wolf M/C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
“Scientific poll” has a meaning. It says that the poll is a gauge of opinion, and is not self-selecting (like the online polls that get “freeped”).

I took a fair amount of statistics in college. I understand the point you are making.

I’m sorry you don’t understand that, sometimes, words mean things.

I also once worked with marketing, advertising and sales people. I understand that "puffery" is an important part of their job.

60 posted on 03/21/2011 6:04:51 AM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson