Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Doves To Hawks ?
Free Republic | 3/27/11 | Alan Levy

Posted on 03/27/2011 1:35:00 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama

What do Moveon.org, thinkprogress.org, americanprogress.org, and mediamatters.org all have in common ?

Well, they're all part of Pharoah $oros' empire....They're all followed by the 2+2=5 crowd....They all hate America.....Oh yeah, NOT ONE OF THEM HAS COME OUT AGAINST CHAIRMAN OBAMA'S LIBYAN ADVENTURE!

If you'll kindly take a stroll with me down Memory Hole Lane, you'll recall that all of the above websites and parent organizations were virulently against the wars in Afganistan and Iraq. They often compared then President Bush to Adolf Hitler, chanted nonsense like "Not in my name!", held peace rallies, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda. It was as if they were trying to recreate the Great Disruption of the 1960's all over again. I have to give them credit, they were able to sour the American attitude against both wars, despite the fact that both wars were vital to national secuirty and were completely necessary.

Out of that maelstrom of liberal stupidity rose a star. That star was Barack Hussein Obama. The previously unknown state senator from Mentally Illinois quickly rose from obscurity to victory in the '08 Popularity Contest which saw him defeat the retread Senator from Arizona, John McPain. During his mad rush to power, Obama made it perfectly clear he was not a fan of either war, as evidenced by this quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on terrorism have reduced the pace of military transformation and have revealed our lack of preparation for defensive and stability operations. This Administration has overextended our military."

http://www.allgreatquotes.com/barack_obama_quotes3.shtml

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The arrogant and lazy lamestream media ate it up, as did the Progressivevik movement. They made it sound like Jesus had returned and was elected President. As Evan Thomas of Newspeak (No, not a typo.) famously said, after Chairman Obama's speech in Cairo:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/06/05/newsweek-s-evan-thomas-obama-sort-god#ixzz1HlUJJp81

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One would think that the lamestream media and Obama's fanatical followers would be bitter and disillusioned after Obama decided to become the hitman of the European Union and the United Nazis (UN). Not at all, True Believer. Some are looking at Obama's Libyan Adventure as a great moment in Liberal History. As Moron Dowd wrote in the New York Slimes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There is something positively mythological about a group of strong women swooping down to shake the president out of his delicate sensibilities and show him the way to war. And there is something positively predictable about guys in the White House pushing back against that story line for fear it makes the president look henpecked."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/23/opinion/23dowd.html?_r=1&ref=maureendowd

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The rank and file Progressiveviks aren't all torn up about Chairman Obama's new found war mongering ways, either. Check out these user posts on Moveon.org:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"This isn't "blood for oil." America has little interest in Libya's resources. There is a dictator who is actually using tactical nukes on citizens. There is a WAVE of spontaneous democratic change sweeping the Middle East right now. It is not the US, but the United Nations, sharing responsibility to aid the democratic rebels in Libya, jsut as it is the United Nation's responsibility to allocate various countries' resources to aiding in the rescue of Japan. The UN, with the US and this President are acting together to make the world a better place, and if you can't see that, you really need to remove Beck's duct tape from your eyes and his fingers from your ears."

[I would be remiss in my duties if I didn't point out that Libya has no tactical nuclear weapons.]

"Someone 'gets' it? Your Cato Institute frame of 'Blood for Oil' makes ZERO sense here to people who have taken the time to even remotely understand what the United Nations is doing and why we're keeping up our end of the bargain as a leading member and remaining world superpower. There is no oil for the US from Libya. There is a spontaneous Democratic revolution sweeping the entire Middle East, and the UN, with our assistance, is aiding the rebels against a dictator who is using tactical nukes against his own people to suppress democratic reform. Shame on you for pushing your Koch Brothers frame of this president, the UN, and our harmonic cooperation with the world. The days of preemptive wars and telling the world what will be done for our own defense and energy industry profit is OVER. You WILL NOT be able to compare this President or his policies to those of Bush, except as a complete yin/yang contrast exercise."

http://front.moveon.org/what-52-years-of-tax-cuts-for-the-wealthy-looks-like/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the past, it would have been easy to just say that the Progressiveviks were just playing the partisan game and were simply standing with the President they worked so hard to get elected. However, the left has become more dangerous than ever, (See Van Jones and Code Pinko's Middle East tour for further details.) and the stakes are so high (We now are fighting three wars on the edge of a total economic break down.) that we can't let our guard down for a second.

My educated guess is this: The Collectivist Left sees Chairman Obama's Libyan Adventure as the redistribution of wealth. The Libyan rebels have nothing, so it's only fair that the greedy, capitalist American tax payer foot the bill for their revolution. This, in the warped mind of a liberal, is a justified use of the United States military. However, when the United States defended itself as it did in the case of the war in Afghanistan, or acted in its best interests as it did with Iraq, all of a sudden it's a problem, because to the left, the United States was defending capitalism by defending itself. I know how bat-poop crazy this sounds, but I don't have any other answer to the question of why the left went from pantywaist doves to hawks in a matter of days.

Congress needs to get off of their ample duffs and put an end to this Libyan Adventure. America's national security nor best interests are being threatened by the chaos in Libya. (To be perfectly blunt and honest, since the rebels have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and quite possibly al-Qaeda, let them and Qadaffi Duck kill each other. Who cares ?) Not one solidier, sailor, airman, or Marine should have to give his life so Libyans can establish an Islamonazi theocracy. Not one thin dime that a tax payer slaved for should pay for this crap. Speaker Boehner, you've been a very big disappointment so far. Time to make amends. Time to pull the plug on Chairman Obama's Libyan Adventure.

God help us all.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: afghanista; afghanistan; collectivism; hypocrisy; iraq; libya; ncollectivism; obama; socialism; war

1 posted on 03/27/2011 1:35:03 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

What do Moveon.org, thinkprogress.org, americanprogress.org, and mediamatters.org all have in common?

Hypocrisy. =.=


2 posted on 03/27/2011 3:58:09 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

It is all politics. We are the exact same way except the opposite of them. We were in full support of Iraq because we had a Republican President but since we have a Democratic President we are against it. Nothing different here.


3 posted on 03/27/2011 4:18:51 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
Speaker Boehner, you've been a very big disappointment so far

That is putting it mildly. Clearly he is not a man on any level and a RINO to boot. I do not trust a man that cannot cry, but I despise a man that cries all the time. I gave this fembot a chance and she has proved to be a little RINO leftist girl.

4 posted on 03/27/2011 5:41:02 AM PDT by fuzzybutt (Democrat Lawyers are the root of all evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
There is a dictator who is actually using tactical nukes on citizens.

That is moonbat gold!

5 posted on 03/27/2011 6:23:46 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Let me be clear, Mr President: the UN is not the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
It is all politics. We are the exact same way except the opposite of them. We were in full support of Iraq...

That dog won't hunt. There is no equivalence.

We've had no congressional debate. There are no American lives or strategic interests to protect.

We've had no address to the American people explaining the underlying reasons, the goal and the players.

There was plenty of criticism of W because he had campaigned against "nation building" and Clinton's interventionist foreign policy.

"We were in full support of Iraq" when the case had been made although some of us were unsure of our ability to "win the peace" ... you know, that whole nation-building thing.

Considering Palin and other supported the no-fly zone, I don't see how you can say this is about politics. Rather, it's about the lack of decisive leadership, unclear mission and inept process throughout.

6 posted on 03/27/2011 6:51:44 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Let me be clear, Mr President: the UN is not the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
It is all politics. We are the exact same way except the opposite of them. We were in full support of Iraq because we had a Republican President but since we have a Democratic President we are against it. Nothing different here.

Wrong Naps.

I'm not against the USA using force in libya, but since we are in it, take off the gloves, put smart bombs where muammer is walking, talking sleeping, until he assumes room temperature.

What to do with the al-quada cells that are in libya is a bigger question.

I would say, use nukes, turn libya into glass for 1,000 years.

7 posted on 03/27/2011 7:21:27 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Darn tootin’!


8 posted on 03/27/2011 8:17:18 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I disagree. This war is is insanity. We already have two wars, and I don’t trust Obama’s motives at all.


9 posted on 03/27/2011 8:19:42 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fuzzybutt

I’ve said this before, but it’s worth repeating: Why not Michele Bachmann for Speaker ?


10 posted on 03/27/2011 8:22:09 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Gold is not the word...platinum...pure platinum...

Sometimes it’s hard to hate the libs...they’re so darn entertaining....


11 posted on 03/27/2011 8:28:55 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey; USS Alaska

I’m going to go with my original stance: The war in Afghanistan was self defense, the war in Iraq was one of national interest.

What national interests are being served by Chairman Obama’s Libyan Adventure ?


12 posted on 03/27/2011 8:32:54 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Get Obummer reelected no matter what the cost is to America. wars create jobs.

Do we want more GUNS or BUTTER? This is an economic war. Its a War for JOBS, TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, and to Get re-elected as he wants to get people back to work with new jobs in the defense industry when all HELL breaks loose.

AXELROD AND OBUMMER have this scripted out to not only destroy the economy when WORLD WAR III erupts but he also knows that he can do anything he wants as he only answers to GEORGE SORO’S.


13 posted on 03/27/2011 11:05:10 AM PDT by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

An interesting view....


14 posted on 03/27/2011 3:17:50 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NPR= Nazi Propaganda Radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson