Posted on 04/14/2011 7:51:40 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
LINKS: Private Investigator Susan Daniels explains Obama's social security number reserved for Connecticut applicants
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I'm not sure I understand the handwringing about Obama's number. So it's from Connecticut. While we know very little about the man, we know he and his family were freaking nomads of the first order. And we're somehow shocked that he has a CT issue SS number? That's the scandal?
If he had an IL number, people would clamor that he didn't move to IL until later in life. A NY number would be scorned because "he would have needed one to apply to college"; a Hawaii number would be laughed off the forum. So, which state would be acceptable?
‘Consider he may have been getting student aid and loans under more than one name. In effect, double dipping’
Fraud? Not from the Dunham/Obamas!
The SS Department clearly states that since 1973 the number is issued from the state application mailing address zip code. http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/stateweb.htm
This is interesting. The law wasn’t changed until 1986. They must have started handing out the forms in the hospitals prior to the change in anticipation of it. I remember a hullabaloo about it, but I didn’t really remember the details (I was not particularly political at that time, a little too busy with 3 little boys). At that point (1986) they began requiring children over 5 to have a number to list on your tax return, and then in 1990 they lowered it to one year of age.
Hmm... At any rate, the Wikipedia article (I know I know) states that most people did NOT have SS numbers until about age 14 before that.
The key to this would be the LSAT coordination office that collects everything you need to apply to law school and then acts as the agent for you when applying to all your choices. They need every record, admission of parking tickets, arrests, every school you ever attended, sealed transcripts, etc...... That is if it really was him who took his own LSAT? Now they fingerprint you to take it. Back then they did not.
I got curious and checked. Apparently the law changed in 86, but they must have been passing the forms out in anticipation by 1979 and 80 (when my last 2 were born). I guess I went ahead and did it, and beat the rush. :) We lived in a small city and it was pretty easy to do there. I think I got all 3 boys done (my older son was born in a different state a couple of years before) done at the same time, but I don’t know for sure. It’s been awhile... ;)
b
Snopes and O’Reilly are putting out disinformation.
The non-citizen father left for Kenya 12 to 13 years after graduating Harvard, Massachusetts before the Connecticut SSN was ever issued in March/April 1977.
I did not know that. LSAT, wow!
Our son was born in ‘86 and we got SS# for both children at that time.
Months ago there was a web report that there was, as I, recall a missionary/aid worker who helped mama Obama leave Kenya with newborn baby. I will try to locate this report in all my printed copies. Otherwise it should be available as a web story, if not scrubbed.
Yeah, I’m sure by then they were handing out the forms in the hospitals for all babies. It was very convenient.
Months ago there was a web report that there was, as I, recall a missionary/aid worker who helped mama Obama leave Kenya with newborn baby. I will try to locate this report in all my printed copies. Otherwise it should be available as a web story, if not scrubbed.
But you still had to have a SS#, which, unlike today, was not required for your parents to claim you as a dependent and therefore you had to be of a reasonable age to receive one. You didn't get it just because your alleged father was in that state, as 0bama claims.
That is why it was Clinton's credo to alway's lie. Never tell lies with truth, it only serves to trip you up later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.