The GOP Jumps the Shark

The Constitution Club ^ | 04-16-11 | Zazu

[AnotherUnixGeek]

if he promises judges in the mode of Scalia and Thomas, he has my vote.

Not mine. I see no reason to believe Trump would keep that promise - the evidence seems to indicate that he'd look for something very different in an SC nominee.

[fr_freak]

For the love of Pete, why is it so difficult for people to understand why Trump is getting so much support right now? I've got your answer here, so read carefully:

It's BALLS, people. The Republicans, regardless of whether they profess to be on the right side of issues, have none of them. Your rank-and-file American wants to see our brilliant Constitution honored. They want to see laws upheld and enforced. They want to see values shared and defended. But the feckless GOPers, who are nothing more than slightly less anti-American political hacks, will do none of those things because they are cowardly, amoral, entrenched bureaucrats who couldn't run the Slurpee machine at 7-11 for a week straight without getting a good and proper ass-chewing for gross incompetence.

It really is very simple. You want the support of the American people (the real ones)? Just stand up. Pick an American principle, any principle, and STICK WITH IT. FIGHT FOR IT. SPEAK UP FOR IT. The people will love and respect you for it, and just might vote you into office despite your other flaws.

We, as a people, hunger for a statesman who actually believes in something. We hunger for a statesman whose dedication to an ideal is so strong that it outweighs his petty self-interest, that it subdues his fear, that it propels him out of bed in the morning when he is weary and wounded and would much rather give in. We are desperate to see even half the commitment to American ideals in a statesman that the average GI has shown when cold, wet and frightened in a foreign land.

Is Trump that statesman? Probably not. But when a man has crawled through the desert for days and just about given up hope for his own survival, even the most rancid, bitter, bug-infested pool of water will appear as manna from the heavens.

Whoever wants to win the next election should take note.

[Lazlo in PA]

Obama is vulnerable, but still enjoys the support of roughly half the population,

So "roughly half" is now 41%? Obummers polls are in the toilet. He is beginning to lose blacks in some polling. This article is a loser.

[TheConservativeCitizen]

It’s an old and well established group blog with numerous libertarian and conservative writers sharing a wide range of views. If you would have looked around before you posted your comment, you would have figured that out easily.

[MissMack99]

Truer words have never been typed; Romney is a putz.

[sten]

i’m behind Trump on the push for eligibility clarification / proof

beyond that, no... i don’t think he’d be the kind of president we need. i prefer my presidents to be inspiring leaders, not cut-throaty business types. (noting that business types and cut-throat business types are different)

[Salamander]

He’s giving them all the Full Alinsky.

I hope he keeps hammering at 0 like a woodpecker on crack.

[OldArmy52]

The author of this opinion piece is clearly no Conservative, and obviously a Trojan Horse. No real Conservative would knock “birthers”. The faker is a Dem/Socialist/Fascist (not twenty five cents worth of difference).

[streetpreacher]

I’ve been pretty supportive of Trump’s efforts. One thing that would cause me to hesitate is if Trump nominated a Harriet Miers to the Court and the right went ballistic, Trump probably wouldn’t back down. Bush was famous for being stubborn and set in his ways but he would probably have nothing on Trump in that regard.

For the most part though, I find the reaction by some on FR, hyperventilating over a Trump candidacy, to be comical.

[OldArmy52]

Well said.
Though I don’t know Trump’s stands on various issues, he is attractive and refreshing as he is showing he has guts and a spine.

[streetpreacher]

The “author” (more appropriately: blogger) of this “article” (more appropriately: vanity post) claims Rasmussen has a conservative bias and that Obama is at 48% approval.

Zazu says:
April 17, 2011 at 11:00 pm
Also, alot of people keep saying Obama poll numbers are in the toilet, which is plain not true. With EVERYTHING going wrong, economy sucking, joblessness, more bloodshed in Afghanistan, a third freaken war (to his party base a Dem starting a war is like a Republican performing an abortion), 4$ gas, the 2010 watershed election, Obama is still at 48% support per Rasmussen, a poll with a conservative bias. So anyone who thinks Obama is a push over and any warm body will defeat him is delusional, stop drinking the Kool Aid.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

[streetpreacher]

Are you Zazu of the lame “Constitution Club” blog? You used the same terminology he did in the comments section: “warm body”. Just curious.

[streetpreacher]

Reagan could carry his ideas in an interview or debate. He won them. The same can’t be said for Palin... yet.

[streetpreacher]

This blogger is citing Rasmussen which he claims has a “conservative bias”. lol

[Uncle Miltie]

The fact that Trump can jump to the top of the list as a one-note-wonder shows our lineup of candidates they need to man-up and campaign. He’s showing Romney et al to be 90 pound weaklings.

I don’t know Trump’s mind; he may have decided to be a pro-0bama spoiler by splitting the Republican vote. Or, he may be honest (a long shot).

But he is showing up the weakness of our field. Someone needs to take a poke at him and knock him off the top of the hill.

[streetpreacher]

Zazu says:
April 17, 2011 at 10:14 pm
When we finally exterminate our own race along with the rest of life on planet earth, some aliens will draw a valuable lesson about getting along from the skeleton of our civilization.

That is why I am not a creationist, if man was made in the image of God, I am personally not impressed.

[streetpreacher]

He’s a Romneybot:

Kittenz for Mittenz!!!
Posted on April 11, 2011 by Zazu
Romney has just formed exploratory committee, designated campaign headquarters, is officially running for President.

Here is the sales pitch:

The Good:
1. He is going to be a formidable candidate due to name recognition, deep coffers, and establishment connections.
2. He is a much better candidate than Palin or Trump (not being a moron, quitter, or conspiracy nut is good).
3. May appeal to moderates and independents.

The Bad:
1. Liberal turned moderate, was pro-abortion, pro-gun control, signed gay marriage into law.
2. A chameleon politician who says what he thinks will get him elected.
3. Hated by the party faithful.
4. A billionaire, people suffering through bad economy do not want to vote for blue bloods.
5. As a Mormon will receive flack from some bigots.

The Ugly:
1. Romneycare, ouch is this going to hurt him, both in the primaries and if he survives, the general election.

Overall: Will only succeed in the primaries given a weak and divided field. If he does win nomination, stands a better chance than virtually any other currently mentioned candidate, still an underdog against Obama though. Even if he wins, likely to be a moderate President.

[American Constitutionalist]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcJiUKGkBiQ&feature=related

[fish hawk]

The more the media is glued to Trump the less time they are taking to hit Palin and Bachmann. my two favorite people. So keep it up Mr. Trump.

[American Constitutionalist]

" * I’m not a birther, but sick of democrats pretending to be outraged by people who question them. * "

Man with no name " It's what people know about themselves inside what makes them afraid.. "